Skip to content
Field Atlas

Atlas / Biology / The Development Thread

Field · Emerged 1651 – 1874

Embryology

How does a single egg turn into a body with a head, a heart and limbs?

5 chapters5 min read5 turning points1 open problem

Branched from
Root of the thread
Branched into
Experimental Embryology
Figures
Aristotle, William Harvey, Caspar Friedrich Wolff, Karl Ernst von Baer, Ernst Haeckel

In brief

Embryology is the study of how an animal develops from a fertilised egg. In a few days or weeks a single cell divides into many, the cells arrange themselves into layers, the layers fold into tubes and pouches, and organs appear in a fixed order. Embryologists describe this sequence and compare it across species.

For two thousand years the central question was whether the parts of the body already exist in miniature in the egg, and merely grow, or whether they form anew in sequence. Careful observation with the microscope settled it in favour of gradual formation. In the nineteenth century embryos became evidence in the debate over evolution, because the embryos of very different animals look alike at early stages. How far they look alike, and what that means, is still argued over.

Key ideas

EpigenesisEnters 1672 – 1759

The body forms step by step from material that has no structure at first. It is the opposite of preformation, the idea that a miniature body exists in the egg or sperm and simply unfolds.

From eggs, allEnters 1651

Every animal, including mammals, starts as an egg. Harvey argued it in 1651, and von Baer found the mammalian egg in 1827.

Germ layersEnters 1817 – 1828

Early embryos of vertebrates sort their cells into three sheets. The outer layer (ectoderm) makes skin and nerves, the middle layer (mesoderm) makes muscle, bone and blood, and the inner layer (endoderm) makes the gut and its organs.

Von Baer's lawsEnters 1817 – 1828

General features of a large group of animals appear in the embryo before the special features of smaller groups. A young embryo of one species resembles the young embryo of another, not the adult.

RecapitulationEnters 1866 – 1874

Haeckel's claim that an embryo passes through the adult forms of its ancestors, so that development replays evolution. In its strong form it is now rejected.

Chapter I

Eggs

The oldest detailed study of an embryo to survive is Aristotle's. He opened hens' eggs on successive days and saw the heart appear as a beating spot of blood before any other organ. He concluded that the parts of an embryo form one after another, in order. He called the process generation. It is now called epigenesis.

Two thousand years later William Harvey, physician to Charles I, took up the question. He dissected the king's deer at intervals after the rut, expecting to find an egg in the womb, and did not. He found only a formless fluid in which an embryo later appeared. He still concluded, from the chick and from reasoning, that every animal begins as an egg. His book of 1651 carried the motto "ex ovo omnia", everything from an egg.

Chapter II

Preformation

The microscope made the question harder, not easier. In 1672 Marcello Malpighi drew chick embryos in eggs that had hardly been warmed and saw structures already in place. Others looking at sperm imagined tiny people curled inside. Preformation, the idea that the body exists complete in miniature and only grows, became the orthodox view. It had a philosophical appeal: if God had made every body at the Creation, nested one inside the next, then matter did not need the power to organise itself.

Caspar Friedrich Wolff disagreed. In 1759 he argued that blood vessels form where there were none, and in 1768–69 he showed that the chick's gut begins as a flat sheet that folds into a tube. The body is built, not unpacked. The great physiologist Albrecht von Haller rejected Wolff's argument, and it took another two generations of better microscopes before epigenesis won.

Chapter III

Layers and Laws

In 1817 Christian Pander, working in Würzburg, saw that the early chick embryo is made of distinct layers. His friend Karl Ernst von Baer traced the layers through many vertebrates and found that they give rise to the same organs in each. In 1827 he found the mammalian egg itself, a speck in the ovary of a dog, finishing what Harvey had begun. The next year he stated his laws of development. General features, such as a backbone, appear before special ones, such as feathers. The embryo of one animal never resembles the adult of another, only its embryo.

Von Baer did not accept evolution. But once Darwin published in 1859, the resemblance of embryos became some of the best evidence for common descent. Ernst Haeckel went further. His biogenetic law of 1866 held that each embryo replays the history of its ancestors, so that a human embryo's throat grooves are the gills of a fish ancestor. His plates of embryos in rows, fish to human, were reprinted for a century. They were also accused, from 1868 onwards, of exaggerating the likeness.

Chapter IV

A Closer Look: From One Cell to Thirty Trillion

An adult human is made of roughly 30 trillion cells, about 3×10133 \times 10^{13}, according to a careful 2016 estimate, and about five in six of them are red blood cells. All come from one fertilised egg. If every cell divided in step, how many rounds of doubling would it take?

2n=3×1013⇒n=log⁡2(3×1013)≈44.8.2^n = 3 \times 10^{13} \quad\Rightarrow\quad n = \log_2 (3 \times 10^{13}) \approx 44.8 .

About 45 doublings. That is surprisingly few. The number of divisions is much larger, because every doubling of NN cells takes NN divisions, so building 3×10133 \times 10^{13} cells needs about 3×10133 \times 10^{13} divisions in all. Real development is not in step either. Some lineages stop dividing early, others keep going for life, and many cells die on purpose along the way.

The first divisions are special. A frog egg is a huge cell, about 1.2 mm across, stocked with yolk. After fertilisation it divides without growing, a process called cleavage, so each division halves the size of the cells:

DivisionsCellsAverage volume of each cellAverage diameter of each cell
0111.2 mm
381/80.6 mm
6641/640.3 mm
95121/5120.15 mm
124,0961/4,0960.075 mm

Because volume goes as the cube of diameter, every three divisions halve the diameter, and after twelve the cells are 40961/3=164096^{1/3} = 16 times narrower, about 75 micrometres, close to the size of ordinary cells. In the frog Xenopus the first division comes about 90 minutes after fertilisation and later ones about every 30 minutes, so the twelfth division happens around 90+11×30=42090 + 11 \times 30 = 420 minutes, about seven hours in. Only then does the embryo's own genome switch on in earnest. Until that point it has been running on instructions and materials packed into the egg by the mother.

Human embryos are slower. Their first divisions come roughly once a day, so an embryo is only about eight cells three days after fertilisation. The principle is the same: a large cell is cut into many ordinary ones before growth begins.

Chapter V

Beyond Description

By 1880 embryologists could describe development in detail for dozens of species and arrange embryos in evolutionary order. They could not say what caused any of it. Why does a cell become part of the gut and not the skin? Answering needed a new approach: cutting, separating and transplanting parts of living embryos to see what they do. That became experimental embryology. The cells themselves were by then understood through cell theory, which showed that the egg is a single cell and every tissue is made of its descendants.

Applications

Where it is used

Open problems

Where the map runs out

Open

Why do embryos converge in the middle?

Open as of 2026; the pattern is supported by gene-expression data, but its cause is debated.

Animals of a large group look most alike not at the very start of development but in the middle, the so-called phylotypic stage, when the basic body plan is laid down. Before and after it they differ more. Is this "hourglass" real, and if so, why is the middle of development so resistant to evolutionary change?

Why it is hard

Resemblance is hard to measure objectively, which is how Haeckel's drawings misled. Comparisons of which genes are switched on at each stage now support an hourglass in flies and vertebrates, but the proposed causes, such as the tight interlocking of signals at that stage, are hard to test directly.

What resolving it unlocks

An understanding of why body plans have stayed fixed for five hundred million years while everything else about animals has changed.

› Sources (2)

Further reading

  1. Needham, J. (1934). A History of Embryology. Cambridge University Press.

    The classic history, from antiquity to the eighteenth century.

  2. Hopwood, N. (2015). Haeckel's Embryos: Images, Evolution, and Fraud. University of Chicago Press.

    How a set of drawings became famous, then infamous.

  3. Gould, S. J. (1977). Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press.

    A long history of the idea that development repeats evolution, and what replaced it.