Skip to content
Field Atlas

Atlas / Mathematics / The Statistics Thread

Field · Emerged 1900 – 1944

Stochastic Processes

What laws govern quantities that change randomly over time?

4 chapters4 min read7 turning points1 open problem

Branched from
Probability Theory + Real Analysis
Branched into
Not yet surveyed past here
Figures
Louis Bachelier, Andrey Markov, Norbert Wiener, Andrey Kolmogorov, Kiyosi Itô, Wolfgang Doeblin, Fischer Black, Myron Scholes, Robert C. Merton, Sergey Brin, Larry Page

In brief

A stochastic process is a quantity that evolves by chance: a share price, the position of a pollen grain in water, the length of a queue, the page a web surfer is reading. Classical probability studied independent trials, such as repeated coin tosses. Stochastic processes allow each step to depend on the past, and follow the whole random path, not just its endpoint.

Two models dominate. In a Markov chain, the future depends on the present state only, not on how it was reached. In Brownian motion, a path moves continuously but so erratically that it has no speed at any instant. Markov, Bachelier, Wiener and Kolmogorov built the theory between 1900 and 1931, and Itô's calculus of 1944 made it possible to do calculus along random paths. The result became the language of finance, of physics at small scales, and of the algorithms that rank the web.

Key ideas

Markov propertyEnters 1906 – 1913

The future depends on the past only through the present. Given today's state, yesterday's adds nothing to the forecast.

Stationary distributionEnters 1906 – 1913

The long-run proportion of time a Markov chain spends in each state. For a well-connected chain it exists, is unique, and does not depend on the starting point.

Brownian motionEnters 1923

A random path whose increments over separate time intervals are independent and normally distributed, with variance proportional to the elapsed time. Wiener proved it exists as a mathematical object, with continuous but nowhere differentiable paths.

Stochastic differential equationEnters 1944

An equation for a quantity driven partly by a smooth trend and partly by random noise. Itô's calculus gives such equations a precise meaning, with its own rule for the chain rule.

Kolmogorov equationsEnters 1931

Differential equations for how the probability distribution of a process evolves. They link random paths to the heat equation and its relatives.

Draws on other domains

  • ↙ Biology

    Cancer Biology

    Carcinogenesis as a multi-type branching process

Chapter I

Chance That Remembers

Probability theory grew up on independent trials. The law of large numbers said that the average of independent coin tosses settles down. In 1902 the Russian mathematician Pavel Nekrasov argued that independence was therefore necessary for the law to hold, and drew conclusions about free will from it. Andrey Markov, a combative atheist, set out to prove him wrong. In 1906 he showed that the law also holds for chains of events in which each depends on the one before. To show that such chains occur in reality, he spent part of 1913 counting letters in Pushkin's verse novel Eugene Onegin.

Chapter II

Brownian Paths

In 1900, in Paris, Louis Bachelier modelled the price of a government bond as a random walk that, in the limit of many small steps, moves continuously. He derived the equation that governs the spread of its probability, the same diffusion equation that Einstein would derive for pollen grains in 1905. His examiner, Henri Poincaré, praised the work, but for half a century it was little read.

The mathematical object came from real analysis. In 1923 Norbert Wiener constructed a probability measure on the space of all continuous paths, proving that Brownian motion exists. Its paths are continuous but so jagged that they have no slope at any point. In 1931 Andrey Kolmogorov showed that the probabilities of any Markov process in continuous time obey two differential equations, joining random paths to the heat equation. Two years later he gave all of probability its axioms.

Calculus along a Brownian path still made no sense, because the path has no derivative. In 1944 Kiyosi Itô, who had developed his ideas at a government statistics office in Tokyo, defined the integral that makes it work. His chain rule has an extra term, because the square of a small Brownian step is not negligible: it is proportional to the time elapsed. In 2000 a sealed envelope that Wolfgang Doeblin had sent to the Paris Academy in 1940, shortly before he died as a soldier, was opened. It held a version of the same formula.

Chapter III

A Closer Look: Markov Counts Letters

Markov's data from the first 20,000 letters of Eugene Onegin are simple enough to follow completely. He found 8,638 vowels and 11,362 consonants. A vowel was followed by another vowel 1,104 times, and a consonant by another consonant 3,827 times. So:

After a …Next is a vowelNext is a consonant
Vowel1104/8638≈0.1281104 / 8638 \approx 0.1280.872
Consonant7535/11362≈0.6637535 / 11362 \approx 0.6630.337

The letters are clearly not independent. If they were, a vowel would follow a vowel about 43% of the time, about 3,700 times in the text, not 1,104. Russian alternates. Treat the text as a two-state Markov chain with these transition probabilities. In the long run, the fraction vv of vowels must stay the same from one letter to the next: vowels arise from vowels at rate 0.128 and from consonants at rate 0.663, so

v=0.128 v+0.663 (1−v)⟹v=0.6631−0.128+0.663≈0.432.v = 0.128\,v + 0.663\,(1 - v) \quad\Longrightarrow\quad v = \frac{0.663}{1 - 0.128 + 0.663} \approx 0.432 .

This is the stationary distribution, and it matches the observed share of vowels, 8638/20000=0.4328638 / 20000 = 0.432. The chain, knowing only which letter class came last, reproduces the overall frequency exactly, as Markov's theorem says it should.

The same calculation ranks the web. Take three pages: A links to B and C, B links to C, and C links back to A. A surfer clicking links at random settles into spending 40% of the time on A, 20% on B and 40% on C. With PageRank's rule that the surfer jumps to a random page 15% of the time, the shares become about 38.8%, 21.5% and 39.7%. C, with two incoming links, edges ahead of A.

Chapter IV

Random Worlds

After 1950 the theory spread in every direction. Economists rediscovered Bachelier, and in 1973 Fischer Black and Myron Scholes, with Robert Merton, used Itô's calculus to price options, founding modern financial mathematics. In 1998 Sergey Brin and Larry Page ranked the web by the stationary distribution of a random surfer. Markov chains also power the samplers of Bayesian statistics, and physicists use random walks to model molecules, as in kinetic theory.

The theory is least complete where a process remembers its whole past. A walk that is forbidden to revisit its own path, the simplest model of a polymer, has resisted proof for more than seventy years in the dimensions where polymers live.

Applications

Where it is used

  • Physics↗ Physics · Kinetic Theory of Gases

    Newton's law with noise

    In 1908 Paul Langevin described a particle in a fluid by Newton's second law plus a random force from molecular impacts. The Langevin equation, the first stochastic differential equation, is still how physicists model Brownian motion and thermal noise.

    › Sources (1)
    • Langevin, P. (1908). Sur la théorie du mouvement brownien. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences 146: 530–533.
  • Cell biology↗ Biology · Cell Biology

    Noisy genes

    Inside a single cell, a gene may be present as one or two copies and its messenger RNA as a few molecules, so chemical reactions happen one random event at a time. Gillespie's algorithm simulates them exactly as a Markov process, and experiments since 2002 have measured how this noise makes genetically identical cells differ.

    › Sources (2)
    • Gillespie, D. T. (1977). Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry 81(25): 2340–2361.
    • Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D. & Swain, P. S. (2002). Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297(5584): 1183–1186.
  • Telecommunications

    The mathematics of waiting

    Agner Krarup Erlang, an engineer at the Copenhagen Telephone Company, modelled calls arriving at an exchange as a random process in 1909, to decide how many lines were needed. Queueing theory, built on Markov processes, now sizes call centres, computer networks and hospital wards.

    › Sources (1)
    • Erlang, A. K. (1909). The theory of probabilities and telephone conversations. Nyt Tidsskrift for Matematik B 20: 33–39.
  • Macroevolution↗ Biology · Macroevolution

    Birth and death on a phylogeny

    Treating speciation and extinction as a birth–death process gives a model whose parameters can be fitted to the branching times of a dated tree, and the practice became standard in evolutionary biology. In 2020 it was proved that such data cannot identify the two rates separately — infinitely many rate histories produce the same distribution of branching times — which is a statement about the process, not about the data, and it invalidated a large literature.

    › Sources (2)
    • Nee, S., May, R. M. & Harvey, P. H. (1994). The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 344: 305–311.
    • Louca, S. & Pennell, M. W. (2020). Extant timetrees are consistent with a myriad of diversification histories. Nature 580: 502–505.

Open problems

Where the map runs out

Open

The self-avoiding walk

Open as of 2026 in two, three and four dimensions; solved above four dimensions (1992).

A self-avoiding walk on a grid never visits the same point twice, a simple model of a long polymer molecule. How far from its start does a typical walk of nn steps end? Physicists predict a distance of about n3/4n^{3/4} in two dimensions, and that the walk then looks, at large scales, like a random curve called SLE with parameter 8/38/3. Neither is proved.

Why it is hard

The walk is not a Markov chain: each step depends on the whole past path. The tools that tame ordinary random walks do not apply. Above four dimensions, where a walk rarely comes near its past, Hara and Slade proved it behaves like Brownian motion. Below, even basic scaling is unproved.

What resolving it unlocks

A rigorous theory of polymers in solution, and a proof of one of the central conjectures linking random curves in the plane to conformal field theory.

› Sources (2)
  • Madras, N. & Slade, G. (1993). The Self-Avoiding Walk. Birkhäuser.
  • Duminil-Copin, H. & Smirnov, S. (2012). The connective constant of the honeycomb lattice equals √(2+√2). Annals of Mathematics 175(3): 1653–1665.

Further reading

  1. Norris, J. R. (1997). Markov Chains. Cambridge University Press.

    A clear introduction to Markov chains in discrete and continuous time.

  2. Grimmett, G. R. & Stirzaker, D. R. (2001). Probability and Random Processes (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    A standard textbook, from basic probability to Brownian motion.

  3. Davis, M. & Etheridge, A. (2006). Louis Bachelier's Theory of Speculation: The Origins of Modern Finance. Princeton University Press.

    Bachelier's thesis in translation, with a history of its influence.