Skip to content
Field Atlas

Atlas / Physics / The Nuclear Thread

Field · Emerged 1913 – 1949

Nuclear Structure

What is the atomic nucleus made of, and what holds it together?

5 chapters5 min read7 turning points1 open problem

Branched from
Radioactivity + Quantum Mechanics
Branched into
Fusion Energy + Nuclear Fission
Figures
Frederick Soddy, Ernest Rutherford, Francis Aston, James Chadwick, Hideki Yukawa, Niels Bohr, Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, Maria Goeppert Mayer, J. Hans D. Jensen, Hans Suess

In brief

Nuclear physics asks what is inside the nucleus, the tiny, dense core that carries nearly all of an atom's mass. The answer, reached by 1932, is protons and neutrons, bound by a force far stronger than electricity but reaching only across the width of the nucleus itself. How tightly they are bound decides which nuclei are stable, which are radioactive, and how much energy is released when nuclei split or fuse.

The subject was built from careful weighing and bold models. Isotopes showed that one element can come in several masses. Precise masses showed that a nucleus weighs less than its parts, and that the missing mass is its binding energy. Two opposite pictures then described nuclei surprisingly well: a drop of liquid, and a set of orbits filled in shells like the electrons of an atom.

Key ideas

IsotopesEnters 1913

Atoms of the same element, with the same number of protons, but different numbers of neutrons and so different masses. They are chemically almost identical.

Mass defect and binding energyEnters 1919 – 1920

A nucleus weighs less than the protons and neutrons that make it. The missing mass, times c2c^2, is the energy that binds it, and the energy needed to pull it apart.

NeutronEnters 1932

The uncharged partner of the proton inside the nucleus, of almost the same mass. Its discovery explained isotopes and gave physics a projectile that nuclei do not repel.

Strong nuclear forceEnters 1935

The attraction between protons and neutrons that overcomes the electrical repulsion of the protons. It is very strong but acts only over about a millionth of a millionth of a millimetre.

Magic numbersEnters 1949

Nuclei with 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82 or 126 protons or neutrons are unusually stable, because those numbers fill complete shells.

Draws on other domains

Chapter I

Too Many Elements

By 1910 chemists had separated about forty radioactive substances, each with its own half-life, but there were only a dozen or so places for them in the periodic table. Frederick Soddy, now in Glasgow, saw in 1913 that many of them could not be separated from known elements by any chemistry. They were the same element with different masses. He called them isotopes, from the Greek for "same place". Henry Moseley showed the same year that an element's place in the table is set by the charge of its nucleus, not its weight.

Francis Aston, J. J. Thomson's assistant in Cambridge, built the instrument that proved it. His mass spectrograph of 1919 sorted charged atoms by mass with great precision. Ordinary neon was a mixture of neon-20 and neon-22. Nearly every isotope weighed almost exactly a whole number of hydrogen masses, but not quite. Helium weighed about 0.7% less than four hydrogen atoms. By Einstein's E=mc2E = mc^2 from special relativity, that missing mass was energy given off when the nucleus formed.

Chapter II

Protons and Neutrons

What was the nucleus made of? In 1919 Ernest Rutherford, firing alpha particles through nitrogen, knocked out hydrogen nuclei. He had, as Patrick Blackett showed in 1925, changed nitrogen into oxygen, the first nuclear reaction made by hand, and the hydrogen nucleus, the proton, was clearly a building block. But protons alone gave the wrong masses. Helium has twice the charge of hydrogen and four times the mass.

In 1932 James Chadwick found the missing piece. The Joliot-Curies in Paris had seen beryllium emit a radiation that knocked protons out of wax, and took it for gamma rays. Chadwick showed it was a neutral particle about as heavy as the proton: the neutron. A nucleus is built of protons and neutrons, and isotopes differ in their neutrons. Something must hold the protons together against their electrical repulsion. In 1935 Hideki Yukawa proposed a force carried by a new, heavy particle, the first theory of the strong force and the start of a long road to particle physics.

Chapter III

A Drop and a Shell

Quantum mechanics could not yet calculate a nucleus from its parts. Physicists used models instead. In 1935 Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker treated the nucleus as a drop of liquid, whose binding energy grows with its volume, is reduced at its surface, and is weakened by the protons' repulsion. The formula fitted the measured masses remarkably well. Niels Bohr used the same picture to explain how a nucleus swallows a neutron. Four years later it would explain fission.

Yet some nuclei did not fit. Those with 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82 or 126 protons or neutrons were unusually stable and common, like the noble gases among atoms. In 1949 Maria Goeppert Mayer, an unpaid "voluntary associate professor" at the University of Chicago, found the explanation after Enrico Fermi asked her whether there was any evidence of spin–orbit coupling. There was. If each particle's spin is strongly tied to its orbit, the energy levels group into shells that close at exactly those numbers. Hans Jensen, with Otto Haxel and Hans Suess, found the same answer in Germany. A drop and a set of orbits were both right, for different questions.

Chapter IV

A Closer Look: Weighing the Glue

Atomic masses are measured in atomic mass units, u, and 1 u of mass is equivalent to 931.5 MeV of energy. A hydrogen atom weighs 1.007825 u and a neutron 1.008665 u. A helium-4 atom, two of each, weighs 4.002602 u. The parts add up to

2×1.007825+2×1.008665=4.032980 u,2 \times 1.007825 + 2 \times 1.008665 = 4.032980\ \text{u} ,

so the helium atom is lighter by 0.0303780.030378 u. That mass defect is the binding energy:

0.030378×931.5≈28.3 MeV,0.030378 \times 931.5 \approx 28.3\ \text{MeV} ,

about 7.1 MeV for each of its four particles. Breaking the bonds between atoms in a molecule takes a few electronvolts. Nuclear binding is a million times stronger.

Doing the same for other nuclei gives the binding energy per particle:

NucleusMass (u)Binding energy (MeV)Per particle (MeV)
Deuterium, ²H2.0141022.21.1
Helium-44.00260228.37.1
Carbon-1212.00000092.27.7
Iron-5655.934936492.38.8
Uranium-235235.0439301783.97.6

The numbers rise steeply among the light nuclei, peak near iron, and fall slowly towards uranium. This curve is the most important fact in nuclear energy. Joining light nuclei moves up the steep side and releases energy, which is fusion. Splitting a heavy nucleus into two medium ones moves up the gentle side, about 0.9 MeV per particle, which is fission. Iron sits at the top, and neither process can get energy out of it.

Chapter V

Splitting and Joining

The binding-energy curve pointed two ways. Its heavy side led, in 1938, to nuclear fission and to the reactor and the bomb. Its light side, already known to power the stars, led to the effort to build fusion energy on Earth. The shell model, meanwhile, predicted that beyond the heaviest known elements there may be an island of stability that no one has yet reached.

Applications

Where it is used

  • Biochemistry↗ Biology · Biochemistry

    Radioactive tracers

    Because isotopes are chemically identical, a radioactive isotope can stand in for its stable twin and reveal where it goes. In 1923 George de Hevesy watered bean plants with radioactive lead and tracked its uptake. Tracers later mapped metabolism: Melvin Calvin used carbon-14 in the 1940s and 1950s to follow each step by which plants turn carbon dioxide into sugar. Hevesy received the 1943 Nobel prize in chemistry.

    › Sources (1)
    • Hevesy, G. (1923). The absorption and translocation of lead by plants. Biochemical Journal 17: 439–445.
  • Medicine

    Scanning with isotopes

    Nuclear medicine injects short-lived isotopes chosen for their chemistry. Technetium 99m, emitting gamma rays with a six-hour half-life, is used in tens of millions of scans of bones, hearts and other organs every year. Positron emitters such as fluorine-18, attached to sugar, show where tissue is most active in PET scans.

  • Structural biology↗ Biology · Structural Biology

    Nuclear spins as a structural probe

    A nucleus with spin precesses in a magnetic field at a frequency that depends on its chemical surroundings, and magnetisation can be passed between nuclei that are close together. Both facts are nuclear physics, and together they let a protein's structure be determined in solution, without a crystal, by assembling a list of short interatomic distances. The same physics, imaged spatially, is magnetic resonance imaging.

    › Sources (2)
    • Wüthrich, K. (1986). NMR of Proteins and Nucleic Acids. Wiley.
    • Ernst, R. R., Bodenhausen, G. & Wokaun, A. (1987). Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions. Clarendon Press.

Open problems

Where the map runs out

Open

Where does the chart of nuclei end?

Open as of 2026. Element 118, oganesson, is the heaviest made, and no nucleus in the predicted island of stability has been reached.

More than 3,300 nuclei are known. Theory suggests about 7,000 could exist before protons or neutrons simply drip off. At the heavy end, the shell model predicts an "island of stability" near 114 to 126 protons and 184 neutrons, where superheavy nuclei might live for minutes or longer instead of milliseconds.

Why it is hard

Superheavy nuclei are made a few atoms at a time by fusing lighter nuclei, and the available combinations have too few neutrons to reach the island. The nuclear force cannot yet be calculated precisely enough for nuclei this heavy, so predictions of where the island lies differ.

What resolving it unlocks

A test of nuclear theory where it is least certain, the chemistry of elements where relativity distorts the electrons, and the nuclei that the rapid neutron capture process passes through when stars make gold and uranium.

› Sources (2)
  • Erler, J. et al. (2012). The limits of the nuclear landscape. Nature 486: 509–512.
  • Oganessian, Yu. Ts. & Utyonkov, V. K. (2015). Super-heavy element research. Reports on Progress in Physics 78: 036301.

Further reading

  1. Pais, A. (1986). Inward Bound: Of Matter and Forces in the Physical World. Oxford University Press.

    The history of the nucleus and its particles, told by a physicist who knew many of the actors.

  2. Krane, K. S. (1988). Introductory Nuclear Physics. Wiley.

    The standard undergraduate textbook, clear on the liquid-drop and shell models.

  3. Brown, A. (1997). The Neutron and the Bomb: A Biography of Sir James Chadwick. Oxford University Press.

    A life of the discoverer of the neutron, who later led the British team at Los Alamos.