Skip to content
Field Atlas

Atlas / Physics / The Relativity Thread

Field · Emerged 1917 – 1965

Physical Cosmology

What is the history and fate of the universe as a whole?

5 chapters5 min read5 turning points3 open problems

Branched from
General Relativity
Branched into
Not yet surveyed past here
Figures
Albert Einstein, Alexander Friedmann, Georges Lemaître, Vesto Slipher, Edwin Hubble, Henrietta Leavitt, Arno Penzias, Robert Wilson, Ralph Alpher, Robert Herman, Saul Perlmutter, Brian Schmidt, Adam Riess

In brief

Physical cosmology treats the whole universe as a physical system with a history. Applying general relativity to all of space showed that the universe cannot be static. It is expanding, and running the expansion backward leads to a hot, dense beginning about 13.8 billion years ago: the Big Bang.

The field has become a precision science, measuring the universe's age and contents to a percent. Those measurements have revealed how little is understood. Ordinary matter makes up only about 5% of the universe. The rest is dark matter and dark energy, known only through their gravity.

Key ideas

Cosmological principleEnters 1917

On the largest scales the universe looks the same everywhere and in every direction. It is the simplifying assumption that makes Einstein's equations solvable for the whole cosmos.

Expansion and redshiftEnters 1927 – 1929

Space itself stretches, carrying galaxies apart. Light crossing expanding space is stretched to longer, redder wavelengths, and more distant galaxies recede faster: v=H0dv = H_0 d.

The Big BangEnters 1922 – 1927

The hot, dense early state from which the observable universe has been expanding and cooling for about 13.8 billion years. It is not an explosion into space but an expansion of space.

Cosmic microwave backgroundEnters 1965

Light released about 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe cooled enough to become transparent, now stretched into microwaves at 2.7 K. It is the oldest light there is.

Dark energy and the cosmological constantEnters 1998 – 1999

Whatever drives the expansion to speed up. The simplest candidate is Einstein's cosmological constant Λ\Lambda, an energy of empty space itself.

Draws on other domains

Chapter I

A Universe for Einstein's Equations

Before 1917 the universe as a whole was not a subject for physics. There was no theory that could describe all of space at once. General relativity changed that, because it made space and time themselves physical. Einstein tried it almost immediately. Assuming that matter is spread evenly on the largest scales, he found that his equations would not allow a static universe. Gravity would make it collapse.

Since everyone then believed the universe was static, he added a term to his equations, the cosmological constant Λ\Lambda, a kind of repulsion built into space that held his model in balance. George Gamow later reported Einstein calling it his "biggest blunder". Whether he ever said so is doubted, and the term has since come back.

Chapter II

The Expanding Universe

Others took the equations at face value. Alexander Friedmann, a Russian mathematician and meteorologist, showed in 1922 that they allow universes that expand or contract. Georges Lemaître, a Belgian priest and physicist, found the same in 1927 and went further. The observed redshifts of galaxies, measured over the previous decade by Vesto Slipher, were what an expanding universe would produce. Lemaître even estimated the expansion rate.

The observational case was made by Edwin Hubble in 1929. Using the relation between the brightness and pulsation period of Cepheid stars discovered by Henrietta Leavitt, he measured distances to galaxies and found that their recession speeds grow in proportion to distance. The universe is expanding. Run the film backward and everything was once packed together; Lemaître called it the "primeval atom". Einstein visited Hubble in 1931 and accepted the expansion.

Chapter III

Echo of the Big Bang

For decades expansion did not settle how the universe began. The steady-state theory of Hoyle, Bondi and Gold (1948) proposed that new matter appears continuously as space expands, so the universe has no beginning. Hoyle would coin the name "Big Bang" for the rival idea on BBC radio in 1949. It was widely heard as mockery, though he denied meaning it that way. Meanwhile Ralph Alpher, Robert Herman and George Gamow worked out what a hot beginning implies: the right mix of hydrogen and helium, and a faint radiation left over from the hot early universe, now cooled to a few degrees above absolute zero.

In 1965 Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson found that radiation by accident, as a hiss in a Bell Labs antenna that would not go away. It filled the sky evenly at 2.7 K. The steady state theory could not explain it, and the Big Bang became the standard picture. Satellites since then (COBE, WMAP, Planck) have mapped its tiny ripples, the seeds of all later galaxies, and measured the universe's age as 13.8 billion years.

Chapter IV

A Closer Look: The Age and Temperature of the Universe

Hubble's law says that a galaxy at distance dd recedes at speed v=H0dv = H_0 d. Today's measurements give H0≈70H_0 \approx 70 km/s per megaparsec, where a megaparsec is 3.09×10193.09 \times 10^{19} km, about 3.3 million light-years.

If every galaxy had always moved at its present speed, they would all have been together a time d/v=1/H0d/v = 1/H_0 ago:

1H0=3.09×1019 km70 km/s≈4.4×1017 s≈14 billion years.\frac{1}{H_0} = \frac{3.09 \times 10^{19} \text{ km}}{70 \text{ km/s}} \approx 4.4 \times 10^{17} \text{ s} \approx 14 \text{ billion years} .

The expansion has not been steady, since gravity slowed it early on and dark energy speeds it up now, but the effects nearly cancel. The full calculation gives 13.8 billion years. The oldest stars are about 13 billion years old, consistent with this. Hubble's own value of H0H_0 was about 500, which implied an age of 2 billion years, younger than the Earth. That contradiction made many astronomers wary of the Big Bang for decades.

The cosmic microwave background tells a second story. About 380,000 years after the Big Bang, the universe cooled to around 3,000 K, cool enough for electrons and protons to form neutral hydrogen. Light then travelled freely for the first time. Since then the universe has expanded about 1,100-fold, and the light's wavelengths have stretched by the same factor, cooling it to

3000 K1100≈2.7 K.\frac{3000 \text{ K}}{1100} \approx 2.7 \text{ K} .

That is the temperature Penzias and Wilson found, and which satellites have since measured as 2.7255 K. By Wien's law it peaks at a wavelength of about 1 millimetre, in the microwave band, which is why an antenna built for satellite communications picked it up. Two measurements, a rate of expansion and a temperature, describe the same history.

Chapter V

The Dark Universe

The precision revealed how much is missing. Already in the 1930s Fritz Zwicky noticed that galaxy clusters hold together only if they contain far more mass than can be seen. In the 1970s Vera Rubin's measurements showed the same for individual galaxies, whose outer stars orbit too fast. This dark matter outweighs ordinary matter about five to one.

Then in 1998 two teams, led by Saul Perlmutter and by Brian Schmidt with Adam Riess, found that the expansion is not slowing down under gravity, as expected, but speeding up. Something, now called dark energy, pushes it. Einstein's discarded Λ\Lambda fits the data. By current measurements ordinary matter is about 5% of the universe, dark matter about 27%, and dark energy about 68%.

This is the fog at the edge of the relativity thread. The two biggest ingredients of the universe are unexplained, the two best measurements of its expansion rate disagree, and even its global shape, whether space closes back on itself as a finite 3-manifold, is open.

Applications

Where it is used

  • The origin of the elements

    Why the universe is mostly hydrogen and helium

    In the first few minutes after the Big Bang, nuclear reactions forged about three parts hydrogen to one part helium by mass, with traces of deuterium and lithium. The predicted proportions match what is observed in the oldest stars and gas clouds, and every heavier element was made later in stars.

    › Sources (1)
    • Alpher, R. A., Bethe, H. & Gamow, G. (1948). The origin of chemical elements. Physical Review 73: 803–804.
  • Particle physics

    Weighing neutrinos with the whole universe

    Neutrinos are so light that laboratories struggle to weigh them, but their total mass affects how galaxies clumped together over cosmic time. Cosmological observations now give the tightest upper limit on the sum of neutrino masses.

    › Sources (1)
    • Planck Collaboration (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics 641: A6.

Open problems

Where the map runs out

Open

What is dark matter?

Not identified as of 2026, despite decades of direct searches.

Galaxies rotate too fast, and clusters hold together too tightly, for the visible matter in them. Something invisible supplies about five times as much gravity as ordinary matter. Its effects are seen in galaxy rotation, gravitational lensing and the cosmic microwave background, but no one knows what it is.

Why it is hard

It seems to interact only through gravity, or only extremely weakly otherwise, so laboratory detectors have so far seen nothing. Candidate particles range across dozens of orders of magnitude in mass. A minority view holds that gravity itself needs modifying, but that struggles to explain the full range of evidence.

What resolving it unlocks

Identifying it would reveal new physics beyond the Standard Model of particles and complete the account of how galaxies formed.

› Sources (2)
  • Rubin, V. C. & Ford, W. K. (1970). Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a spectroscopic survey of emission regions. Astrophysical Journal 159: 379–403.
  • Bertone, G. & Hooper, D. (2018). History of dark matter. Reviews of Modern Physics 90: 045002.

Open

What is dark energy?

Open as of 2026. Some recent galaxy surveys hint that it may change over time, which a pure cosmological constant cannot.

About two-thirds of the universe's energy is something that makes the expansion accelerate. The simplest explanation is the energy of empty space, Einstein's cosmological constant. But its measured value is inexplicably small.

Why it is hard

Quantum theory predicts a vacuum energy roughly 1012010^{120} times larger than observed, perhaps the worst prediction in physics, and no known mechanism cancels it almost but not quite exactly. Dark energy can be studied only through its effect on the expansion history of the whole universe.

What resolving it unlocks

It would determine the ultimate fate of the universe and likely require new physics connecting gravity with the quantum vacuum.

› Sources (1)
  • Weinberg, S. (1989). The cosmological constant problem. Reviews of Modern Physics 61: 1–23.

Open

The Hubble tension

Unresolved as of 2026. The microwave-background and Cepheid–supernova values have stayed apart as measurements improved, though some other local methods land in between.

The universe's current expansion rate, H0H_0, comes out at about 67 km/s per megaparsec when inferred from the early universe (the microwave background) but about 73 when measured directly from nearby stars and supernovae. The gap is far larger than either method's stated uncertainty.

Why it is hard

Either one of the measurements has a subtle systematic error that years of checking have not found, or the standard model of cosmology is missing something that changes how the universe expanded between early and late times.

What resolving it unlocks

If real, it would be the first crack in the standard cosmological model, possibly pointing to new particles or a new form of early dark energy.

› Sources (2)
  • Planck Collaboration (2020). Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics 641: A6.
  • Riess, A. G. et al. (2022). A comprehensive measurement of the local value of the Hubble constant with 1 km/s/Mpc uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES team. Astrophysical Journal Letters 934: L7.

Further reading

  1. Weinberg, S. (1977). The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe. Basic Books.

    A Nobel laureate's classic account of the early universe for general readers.

  2. Ryden, B. (2016). Introduction to Cosmology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    The standard gentle undergraduate textbook.

  3. Kragh, H. (1996). Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. Princeton University Press.

    The history of the Big Bang versus steady-state debate, carefully told.