Skip to content
Field Atlas

Atlas / Physics / The Light Thread

Field · Emerged 1956 – 2012

Quantum Optics

What is left of the wave description when light is counted one photon at a time, and what can be done to light that classical physics forbids?

4 chapters6 min read6 turning points1 open problem

Branched from
Wave Optics + Quantum Mechanics
Branched into
Lasers and Photonics
Figures
Robert Hanbury Brown, Richard Twiss, Roy Glauber, H. Jeff Kimble, Mario Dagenais, Leonard Mandel, Steven Chu, William Phillips, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, Theodor Hänsch, Carlton Caves, Richard Slusher, Serge Haroche, David Wineland

In brief

Einstein's quanta of 1905 explained how light is absorbed, but for fifty years nobody needed a quantum theory of light itself: Maxwell's waves plus the odd quantised exchange covered every optical experiment. That ended in 1956, when Robert Hanbury Brown and Richard Twiss pointed two photomultipliers at Sirius and correlated their intensities, and found that photons from a hot source arrive in clumps. Roy Glauber's theory of optical coherence, in 1963, explained why — and showed that the laser, the thermal lamp and a single atom produce statistically distinguishable kinds of light.

Once that was clear, light became something to engineer at the level of individual quanta. A single atom can be made to emit photons one at a time, never two. Noise can be moved out of one property of a beam and into another, so that a measurement beats the limit set by random photon arrival. Atoms can be stopped almost dead by the recoil from absorbed photons, which is how the coldest matter in the universe is made. And a single photon can be kept bouncing in a cavity long enough to be examined repeatedly without being destroyed.

Key ideas

Coherent stateEnters 1963

The quantum state that comes closest to a classical wave of definite amplitude and phase. It is what a laser well above threshold emits, and its photon number is Poisson-distributed: counting photons in a laser beam gives a mean nˉ\bar{n} with spread nˉ\sqrt{\bar{n}}.

Second-order correlationEnters 1963

The quantity g(2)(0)g^{(2)}(0) measures how likely two photons are to arrive together, relative to independent arrivals. Thermal light gives 2, a laser gives 1, and a single emitter gives 0 — three values that identify the source regardless of its brightness or colour.

Bunching and antibunchingEnters 1977

Photons from a hot body arrive in clumps because its field amplitude fluctuates; photons from a single atom arrive spaced out, because after emitting one the atom must be re-excited before it can emit again. Antibunching has no classical explanation at all.

Squeezed lightEnters 1981 – 2019

Uncertainty in a light field is shared between two quantities, like amplitude and phase. Squeezing redistributes it — reducing the noise in one below the vacuum level at the cost of raising it in the other — so a measurement that depends on only one of them can beat the shot-noise limit.

Radiation pressure coolingEnters 1975 – 1997

An atom moving towards a slightly red-detuned laser sees the light Doppler-shifted into resonance, absorbs more photons from ahead than behind, and is slowed by their recoil. Six beams make a viscous trap for atoms, cooling them to microkelvin.

Strong couplingEnters 1989 – 2012

When an atom in a cavity exchanges a photon with the cavity faster than either can lose it to the outside, the two stop being separate systems. The photon can then be measured without being absorbed, repeatedly.

Chapter I

Correlating Intensities Instead of Amplitudes

Measuring the angular diameter of a star by interferometry means combining light from two apertures and looking for fringes, which requires the two paths to be matched to a fraction of a wavelength across the whole instrument. Robert Hanbury Brown and Richard Twiss wanted to do it with a baseline of hundreds of metres, and realised they could sidestep the mechanical problem by throwing away the phase. Put a photomultiplier at each aperture, record the fluctuations in the intensity each one sees, and multiply the two records together. Where the star is unresolved the fluctuations are correlated; as the baseline grows, the correlation falls away, and the shape of the falloff gives the diameter. They measured Sirius in 1956.

The by-product was more important than the instrument. The correlation at zero baseline is positive and large: photons from a hot source arrive bunched together, not independently. Several physicists insisted this was impossible — if photons are independent particles, a coincidence rate above chance has nowhere to come from — and one group published a null result. The effect was real, and it is the simplest fact about light that classical particle intuition gets wrong.

Chapter II

Three Kinds of Light

Roy Glauber supplied the framework in 1963. The question "is this light coherent?" had meant "does it produce fringes?", a statement about the first-order correlation of the field. Glauber showed that a photodetector does not measure the field; it measures normally ordered correlations of the quantised field, and there is a whole hierarchy of them. Light can be first-order coherent and second-order anything.

The second-order quantity, written g(2)(0)g^{(2)}(0), is the probability of detecting two photons at once divided by what it would be if detections were independent. It takes three characteristic values. For thermal light — a star, a filament, any hot body — the field amplitude itself fluctuates, bright moments deliver pairs, and g(2)(0)=2g^{(2)}(0) = 2: the Hanbury Brown–Twiss bunching. For a laser well above threshold, the amplitude is steady and photon arrivals are Poisson, giving g(2)(0)=1g^{(2)}(0) = 1. And for a single atom, g(2)(0)=0g^{(2)}(0) = 0, because having just emitted, it has nothing left to emit until it is re-excited.

That third case is the one classical physics cannot reach. Any classical field, however exotic, has g(2)(0)≥1g^{(2)}(0) \ge 1. Jeff Kimble, Mario Dagenais and Leonard Mandel measured g(2)(0)<1g^{(2)}(0) < 1 from sodium atoms in 1977, and in doing so produced the first light that demonstrably required quantisation of the field, rather than merely of the matter absorbing it.

Chapter III

A Closer Look: What Photon Statistics Cost a Quantum Cryptographer

Start with the scale. A 1 mW beam at 550 nm carries photons of energy

E=hcλ=(6.626×10−34)(3.00×108)550×10−9=3.6×10−19 J,E = \frac{hc}{\lambda} = \frac{(6.626 \times 10^{-34})(3.00 \times 10^{8})}{550 \times 10^{-9}} = 3.6 \times 10^{-19} \text{ J},

so the flux is 10−3/3.6×10−19≈2.8×101510^{-3} / 3.6 \times 10^{-19} \approx 2.8 \times 10^{15} photons per second. Individual photons are not a scarce resource in ordinary light; the issue is their arrival pattern.

For a coherent state of mean photon number μ\mu, the number arriving in a given interval is Poisson:

P(n)=e−μμnn!.P(n) = e^{-\mu}\frac{\mu^{n}}{n!}.

Now consider quantum key distribution. The BB84 protocol is secure because an eavesdropper cannot copy a single photon without disturbing it. If a pulse contains two identical photons, she can take one and let the other through, learning a bit with no disturbance at all — the photon-number-splitting attack. Real systems mostly use an attenuated laser rather than a true single-photon source, so what matters is how often a non-empty pulse contains more than one photon.

Attenuate to μ=0.1\mu = 0.1 photons per pulse:

P(0)=e−0.1=0.9048,P(1)=0.0905,P(2)=0.00452,P(≥2)=0.00468.P(0) = e^{-0.1} = 0.9048, \quad P(1) = 0.0905, \quad P(2) = 0.00452, \quad P({\ge}2) = 0.00468.

Of the pulses that contain anything at all, the fraction carrying two or more is

0.004681−0.9048=0.004680.0952=4.9%.\frac{0.00468}{1 - 0.9048} = \frac{0.00468}{0.0952} = 4.9\%.

One pulse in twenty of the useful ones is leaky. Lower μ\mu to improve that and you lose signal proportionally: at μ=0.01\mu = 0.01 the multi-photon fraction falls to about 0.5%, but 99% of pulses are empty, so the key rate falls by a factor of ten. The trade-off is set entirely by Poisson statistics, and it is why decoy-state protocols — which estimate the eavesdropper's advantage by varying μ\mu — had to be invented, and why a deterministic single-photon source with g(2)(0)≈0g^{(2)}(0) \approx 0 would be worth so much.

The same arithmetic run backwards is the shot-noise limit. Counting NN photons gives a relative precision of 1/N1/\sqrt{N}, so an interferometer using 102010^{20} photons per second measures a phase to about 10−1010^{-10} radians — unless the light is squeezed, in which case the uncertainty is redistributed and the phase can be measured better at the cost of the amplitude being measured worse. That is the trick running inside LIGO since 2019.

Chapter IV

Light as a Tool on Matter

The last part of the subject turns the relationship around: instead of using matter to make interesting light, use light to control matter. An atom absorbing a photon takes its momentum, h/λh/\lambda, which at sodium's 589 nm is 1.1×10−271.1 \times 10^{-27} kg·m/s. Divided by the mass of a sodium atom, 3.8×10−263.8 \times 10^{-26} kg, that is a velocity change of 2.9 cm/s per photon. Do it ten thousand times a second with a laser tuned slightly below resonance, so that only atoms moving towards the beam are Doppler-shifted into resonance, and the atoms are slowed. Six beams make a viscous medium for atoms, and Steven Chu, William Phillips and Claude Cohen-Tannoudji brought sodium to microkelvin temperatures this way — colder, by then, than anything else known. The Bose–Einstein condensate of 1995 was made from laser-cooled atoms, and the optical lattice clock followed.

Serge Haroche took the complementary route: trap the photon and send atoms past it. Microwave photons between superconducting mirrors of extraordinary quality survive more than a tenth of a second, during which the photon travels some 40,000 kilometres between reflections. A Rydberg atom crossing the cavity acquires a phase shift that depends on whether a photon is there, without absorbing it, so the same photon can be interrogated hundreds of times and its eventual disappearance watched as a quantum jump.

The techniques here feed two directions. Engineering light's statistics and entanglement for computation and communication is quantum information. Making light intense, short and coherent enough to be an industrial and scientific instrument is lasers and photonics, and almost everything in this chapter was done with a laser in the first place.

Applications

Where it is used

  • Timekeeping

    Clocks that would not have drifted since the Big Bang

    Laser-cooled atoms held in an optical lattice, probed on a narrow transition, give clocks with fractional uncertainty near 10−1810^{-18} — a second in the age of the universe. They are sensitive enough that moving one a centimetre higher measurably changes its rate through gravitational redshift, and they are the reason the SI second is expected to be redefined optically.

    › Sources (2)
    • Ludlow, A. D., Boyd, M. M., Ye, J., Peik, E. & Schmidt, P. O. (2015). Optical atomic clocks. Reviews of Modern Physics 87: 637–701.
    • Bothwell, T. et al. (2022). Resolving the gravitational redshift across a millimetre-scale atomic sample. Nature 602: 420–424.
  • Single-molecule biology↗ Biology · Cell Biology

    Counting the photons from one molecule

    Detecting a single fluorophore means collecting a few thousand photons before it bleaches, and distinguishing them from background by their arrival statistics. The photon-counting detectors, correlation techniques and photophysics came from quantum optics, and they are what make single-molecule localisation microscopy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy work inside living cells.

    › Sources (2)
    • Moerner, W. E. & Kador, L. (1989). Optical detection and spectroscopy of single molecules in a solid. Physical Review Letters 62: 2535–2538.
    • Betzig, E. et al. (2006). Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science 313: 1642–1645.
  • Gravitational-wave detection

    Beating shot noise in a four-kilometre interferometer

    Above a few hundred hertz, LIGO's sensitivity is limited by the random arrival of photons at its output. Injecting squeezed vacuum into the dark port reduces that noise at the cost of raising radiation-pressure noise at low frequency, and has been running continuously since 2019. The detectors' reach — and therefore the number of mergers seen per year — depends on a 1985 tabletop result.

    › Sources (1)
    • Tse, M. et al. (2019). Quantum-enhanced advanced LIGO detectors. Physical Review Letters 123: 231107.

Open problems

Where the map runs out

Open

A single-photon source good enough to scale

Open as of 2026; the best sources reach high purity or high efficiency, not both at scale.

Photonic quantum computing needs photons produced on demand, one at a time, every time, and indistinguishable from one another to within their coherence. Quantum dots and defect centres give good purity and brightness but each emitter differs slightly from its neighbours; parametric down-conversion gives perfectly matched photons at random times, with multi-photon errors that grow as the rate rises.

Why it is hard

The three requirements pull against each other. Making an emitter bright means coupling it strongly to its surroundings, which is also what spoils its spectral purity; making photons identical means making many solid-state emitters identical to a part in 10410^{4}, which fabrication does not yet do.

What resolving it unlocks

Linear-optical quantum computing and long-distance quantum repeaters both have resource requirements that scale badly with source imperfection, so a factor of two in efficiency can be a factor of a thousand in overhead.

› Sources (2)
  • Senellart, P., Solomon, G. & White, A. (2017). High-performance semiconductor quantum-dot single-photon sources. Nature Nanotechnology 12: 1026–1039.
  • Aharonovich, I., Englund, D. & Toth, M. (2016). Solid-state single-photon emitters. Nature Photonics 10: 631–641.

Further reading

  1. Haroche, S. & Raimond, J.-M. (2006). Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons. Oxford University Press.

    Cavity QED from the people who built it, with the conceptual payoff kept in view.

  2. Loudon, R. (2000). The Quantum Theory of Light, 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.

    The standard graduate treatment of the quantised field and photon statistics.

  3. Hanbury Brown, R. (1991). Boffin: A Personal Story of the Early Days of Radar, Radio Astronomy and Quantum Optics. Adam Hilger.

    A first-hand account of the intensity interferometer, including the hostility it met.