Skip to content
Field Atlas

Atlas / Biology / The Molecular Structure Thread

Field · Emerged 1931 – 1969

Protein Crystallography

How can the position of every atom in a molecule of ten thousand atoms be determined, when the only measurement available is the brightness of diffracted spots?

4 chapters7 min read6 turning points1 open problem

Branched from
Biochemistry
Branched into
Structural Biology
Figures
William Astbury, Dorothy Hodgkin, John Desmond Bernal, Linus Pauling, Robert Corey, Francis Crick, Max Perutz, John Kendrew

In brief

By 1930 enzymes were known to be proteins and proteins were known to be chains of amino acids, and nobody had any idea what one looked like. The obstacle was not resolution but information. X-rays diffracted by a crystal produce a pattern of spots whose intensities can be measured precisely, and the arrangement of atoms is the Fourier transform of that pattern — except that a Fourier transform needs both the amplitude and the phase of each component, and a detector records only the amplitude. Half the data is destroyed by the act of measurement.

This phase problem took twenty years to defeat. Max Perutz's solution, worked out over two decades on haemoglobin, was to attach a heavy atom to the protein at a known site: the extra scattering interferes with the protein's, and the resulting change in each spot's brightness depends on the phase that is missing. In 1958 John Kendrew produced the first three-dimensional structure of a protein, myoglobin, and it looked like nothing anyone had predicted — an irregular, lumpy arrangement of helical segments with no symmetry at all. The field's founding result was that proteins do not have tidy structures.

Key ideas

Diffraction and Bragg's lawEnters 1931 – 1934

A crystal scatters X-rays strongly in directions where waves from successive planes of atoms arrive in step: nλ=2dsin⁡θn\lambda = 2d\sin\theta. Each spot in the pattern corresponds to one Fourier component of the electron density, and finer detail appears at larger angles.

The phase problemEnters 1953 – 1959

A diffraction pattern gives the magnitude of each Fourier component and not its phase. Without phases the density cannot be reconstructed, and the phases cannot be measured directly because detectors respond to intensity.

Isomorphous replacementEnters 1953 – 1959

Soak a heavy atom into the crystal without disturbing its packing. Its scattering interferes with the protein's, so the intensity changes measurably, and the size of the change in each spot constrains the missing phase. Two or more such derivatives determine it.

ResolutionEnters 1958 – 1960

The finest spacing resolved, set by the largest diffraction angle at which usable spots appear. At 5 Å a protein is a shape; at 3 Å the chain can be traced and side chains placed; below 1.5 Å individual atoms separate.

Secondary structureEnters 1951

Local regular folds of the backbone — the α\alpha-helix and the β\beta-sheet — stabilised by hydrogen bonds between backbone atoms. Pauling derived both from bond geometry before either was seen in a protein.

Draws on other domains

Chapter I

A Pattern With Half Its Information Missing

By the early 1930s proteins were known to be chains of amino acids, and enzymes were known to be proteins. What a protein molecule looked like was entirely open; the respectable guesses included regular rods, flat sheets and symmetric cages, on the general principle that a molecule with thousands of atoms must be built on some simple plan.

William Astbury, employed by the Leeds wool industry, got the first hint of local order. Keratin fibres gave X-ray patterns that changed reproducibly when stretched, implying that the polypeptide chain has at least two regular conformations — a coiled one and an extended one. John Desmond Bernal and Dorothy Crowfoot then showed, in 1934, that a protein crystal can give a rich diffraction pattern at all. The trick was to keep the crystal wet: taken out of its mother liquor, a pepsin crystal collapses, which is why earlier attempts had failed. Mounted in a sealed capillary, it produced hundreds of sharp spots.

That settled the existence question — protein molecules are identical, ordered objects — and exposed the real difficulty. The electron density in the crystal is the Fourier transform of the diffraction pattern, and a Fourier transform needs each component's amplitude and phase. A photographic plate or a counter records intensity, which gives the amplitude. The phase is not recorded, cannot be inferred from the intensities for a molecule of this size, and is half of what is needed. Twenty years of work on protein crystals produced beautiful patterns and no structures.

Chapter II

Two Routes That Did Not Need the Phases

While the phase problem stood, two kinds of result were obtained around it, and both mattered.

The first was to work on molecules small enough to be solved by trial. For a structure with a few dozen atoms, one can guess an arrangement, compute the diffraction pattern it would give, compare with the measured intensities, and adjust — and if a heavy atom is present its position can often be found from the pattern of intensities alone. Dorothy Hodgkin made this a method. Her structure of penicillin, completed in 1945, settled a chemical argument by showing a strained four-membered ring that senior chemists had declared impossible; her structure of vitamin B12, in 1956, located 181 atoms around a central cobalt in a molecule for which no chemical route to the answer existed at all. The B12 work used one of the first digital computers applied to crystallography, and it demonstrated that X-ray analysis could now outrun chemical inference.

The second route did not use diffraction patterns to find a structure at all; it used them to check one. Linus Pauling had established that the peptide bond is planar, with partial double-bond character that prevents rotation about it, and he knew the hydrogen bond's preferred length and geometry. With Robert Corey and Herman Branson he asked what regular conformations a polypeptide chain can adopt if every backbone amide is to make a hydrogen bond and no bond angle is to be strained. The question has only a few answers. One is a helix with 3.6 residues per turn and a rise of 1.5 Å per residue — the α\alpha-helix — and another is a pleated sheet in which neighbouring strands hydrogen-bond to each other.

Both were published in 1951, derived from bond lengths and angles on paper, with no protein structure in existence to test them against. Astbury's stretched and unstretched keratin patterns from the 1930s turned out to correspond to the two forms. Seven years later the helices appeared in the first protein structure, at the predicted dimensions. It is the clearest case in structural biology of a prediction from chemical principles arriving before the measurement, and it is worth noting what it did not predict: how the helices are arranged relative to each other, which is the part that required the phases.

Chapter III

A Closer Look: How a Mercury Atom Supplies a Phase

The reasoning behind the solution is worth following, because it is a case of extracting missing information by deliberately perturbing the sample.

First, the scale of the problem. Each diffraction spot is one Fourier component, and the number of them grows as the inverse cube of the resolution. Myoglobin's 2 Å map required about ten thousand independent measurements, each needing a phase angle somewhere between 0 and 360 degrees. Guessing is not available: a Fourier synthesis with wrong phases gives noise that looks like nothing.

Max Perutz's idea was to add a heavy atom. Haemoglobin has two reactive sulphydryl groups that will bind mercury, and if the crystal's packing is undisturbed — an isomorphous derivative — then every spot's amplitude becomes the sum of two contributions: the protein's, unknown in phase, and the mercury's, whose phase is calculable once its position is known. The two interfere. Where they are in step the spot gets brighter; where they oppose, dimmer. The change in each amplitude therefore carries information about the protein's phase at that reflection.

Whether the effect would be big enough to measure was not obvious, and Francis Crick and Beatrice Magdoff computed it in 1956. For NHN_H heavy atoms of scattering factor fHf_H in a protein of NPN_P light atoms of average factor fPf_P, the typical fractional change in amplitude is

ΔFF≈2NHNP⋅fHfP.\frac{\Delta F}{F} \approx \sqrt{\frac{2N_H}{N_P}} \cdot \frac{f_H}{f_P}.

Haemoglobin has about 4,500 non-hydrogen atoms, mostly carbon, nitrogen and oxygen, so fP≈7f_P \approx 7 electrons. Mercury has fH=80f_H = 80. With two mercury sites:

ΔFF≈44500×807=0.030×11.4=0.34.\frac{\Delta F}{F} \approx \sqrt{\frac{4}{4500}} \times \frac{80}{7} = 0.030 \times 11.4 = 0.34.

A third. Intensity measurements of the day were good to a few per cent, so the signal is comfortably above the noise — which is why the method works for a molecule of 65,000 daltons, and why it begins to fail for much larger ones, since the effect falls as 1/NP1/\sqrt{N_P}. For a protein of a million daltons, two mercuries would change the amplitudes by about 7%, and that is the practical ceiling of the technique.

One derivative is not quite enough: the interference fixes the phase to one of two values, so a second derivative with a different heavy atom at a different site is needed to break the tie. Perutz's haemoglobin work used several. With phases in hand, the Fourier synthesis can be computed — ten thousand terms summed at every point of a grid, which on the machines of 1959 took weeks.

The resolution the map achieves follows from Bragg's law, nλ=2dsin⁡θn\lambda = 2d\sin\theta. With copper X-rays at λ=1.54\lambda = 1.54 Å, resolving d=2d = 2 Å needs spots out to

sin⁡θ=1.542×2=0.385,θ=22.6∘.\sin\theta = \frac{1.54}{2 \times 2} = 0.385, \qquad \theta = 22.6^{\circ}.

Spots at larger angles are weaker and are the first casualties of radiation damage, which is why resolution is a measure of how good the crystal was rather than how good the instrument is.

Chapter IV

What the First Structure Showed

John Kendrew chose myoglobin because it is a quarter the size of haemoglobin and crystallises well from the muscle of sperm whales, which were then still being hunted. His 6 Å map of 1958 showed a sausage of electron density; the 2 Å map of 1960 showed the chain.

It was a mess. Eight helical segments of varying length, joined by irregular turns, packed into a compact lump with the haem group wedged in a pocket, and no symmetry of any kind. Kendrew wrote that the most striking feature was the almost total absence of the regularity that had been expected. The helical segments were exactly the ones Pauling and Corey had derived on paper seven years earlier, at the predicted pitch. The way those segments were arranged relative to one another was not derivable from anything.

This is the result the field was founded on, and it set the agenda for everything after. A protein's shape is specific, reproducible and irregular, which means it must be determined rather than deduced — and, as the chemistry turned out, it is determined by the amino acid sequence alone, a fact established at almost the same time and discussed under protein structure prediction. The immediate payoff was medical: Perutz's haemoglobin maps located the glutamate at position 6 of the β chain whose replacement by valine causes sickle-cell disease, and showed that the substitution creates a sticky hydrophobic patch on the deoxygenated molecule — a surface defect that makes the molecules polymerise into fibres.

What could then be done with structures of enzymes, membrane proteins and assemblies of hundreds of components is structural biology. The crystals themselves remain the bottleneck: growing one is still done by dispensing thousands of conditions and hoping.

Applications

Where it is used

  • Medicine

    Sickle-cell anaemia, read from a structure

    Perutz's haemoglobin work showed where every amino acid sits, including position 6 of the β chain, where the glutamate replaced by valine in sickle-cell disease creates a sticky hydrophobic patch on the deoxygenated form. The patch fits a complementary pocket on a neighbouring molecule, so deoxygenated sickle haemoglobin polymerises into fibres that deform the cell. A single-base substitution, a changed surface, and a disease — the first such chain established in molecular detail.

    › Sources (2)
    • Perutz, M. F. & Mitchison, J. M. (1950). State of haemoglobin in sickle-cell anaemia. Nature 166: 677–679.
    • Eaton, W. A. & Hofrichter, J. (1990). Sickle cell hemoglobin polymerization. Advances in Protein Chemistry 40: 63–279.
  • Crystallography↗ Physics · Crystallography

    What X-rays did for biology, biology did for X-rays

    Protein crystals are mostly water, diffract weakly, and die under the beam, so they forced the development of cryo-cooling, synchrotron sources, area detectors and direct methods for phasing that then served chemistry and materials science. The traffic ran both ways: the physics of crystallography supplied the method, and the demands of proteins drove its instrumentation for fifty years.

    › Sources (1)
    • Helliwell, J. R. (1992). Macromolecular Crystallography with Synchrotron Radiation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Computing↗ Mathematics · Numerical Analysis

    An early consumer of serious computation

    A Fourier synthesis over ten thousand reflections at a few thousand grid points was beyond hand calculation, and crystallographers were among the first scientific users of digital computers: Hodgkin's vitamin B12 work used machines in Los Angeles and Manchester, and Kendrew's myoglobin maps were computed on the EDSAC in Cambridge. The field's demand for fast Fourier transforms preceded and motivated some of the standard numerical practice.

    › Sources (1)
    • Ferry, G. (1998). Dorothy Hodgkin: A Life. Granta.

Open problems

Where the map runs out

Open

Predicting whether a protein will crystallise

Open as of 2026; crystallisation remains a screen over thousands of conditions.

Growing a crystal good enough to diffract remains the rate-limiting step for most proteins and is attempted by brute force: robots dispense thousands of combinations of precipitant, buffer, salt, temperature and additive, and most proteins yield nothing. Membrane proteins, flexible proteins and large complexes are the worst cases, and no theory predicts from a sequence which conditions to try, or whether any exist.

Why it is hard

Crystallisation requires a protein to make a specific set of weak, ordered contacts with copies of itself, which depends on surface charge patches, flexible loops and bound water in ways that vary with every condition in the drop. The relevant free-energy differences are a few kBTk_BT, and nucleation is a rare stochastic event, so the outcome is not reproducible even between identical drops.

What resolving it unlocks

Crystallography still gives the highest-resolution structures available, and the method remains blocked for whole classes of medically important proteins. Cryo-electron microscopy has reduced the pressure without removing it.

› Sources (2)
  • McPherson, A. & Gavira, J. A. (2014). Introduction to protein crystallization. Acta Crystallographica F 70: 2–20.
  • Chayen, N. E. & Saridakis, E. (2008). Protein crystallization: from purified protein to diffraction-quality crystal. Nature Methods 5: 147–153.

Further reading

  1. Perutz, M. F. (1998). I Wish I'd Made You Angry Earlier. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Essays by the person who solved the phase problem, including on how long it took.

  2. Ferry, G. (1998). Dorothy Hodgkin: A Life. Granta.

    A biography that conveys what structure determination involved before computers.

  3. Rhodes, G. (2006). Crystallography Made Crystal Clear, 3rd edition. Academic Press.

    The clearest explanation of the phase problem and how it is solved.