Skip to content
Field Atlas

Atlas / Physics / The Matter Thread

Field · Emerged 1784 – 1913

Crystallography

How are atoms arranged inside a solid, and how can we see an arrangement far too small for any microscope?

5 chapters5 min read7 turning points1 open problem

Branched from
Electromagnetism
Branched into
Solid-State Physics
Figures
René Just Haüy, Auguste Bravais, Max von Laue, Walter Friedrich, Paul Knipping, William Lawrence Bragg, William Henry Bragg, Kathleen Lonsdale, Dorothy Hodgkin, Dan Shechtman

In brief

A crystal is matter in which atoms repeat in a regular pattern, like tiles on a floor that extends in three dimensions. The flat faces and fixed angles of quartz, salt and snowflakes had long hinted at an inner order. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries mineralogists and mathematicians worked out what repeating patterns are possible, long before anyone could see a single atom.

In 1912 Max von Laue showed that X-rays are diffracted by crystals, and within a year the Braggs, father and son, had turned diffraction into a way of reading atomic positions. The method went on to reveal the structures of salt, diamond, penicillin, vitamin B12, insulin and DNA. In 1982 it also produced a pattern that the rules said was impossible, and the definition of a crystal had to change.

Key ideas

LatticeEnters 1848 – 1850

The grid of points at which a crystal's pattern repeats. Bravais showed that in three dimensions there are only 14 distinct kinds of lattice.

X-ray diffractionEnters 1912

X-rays have wavelengths close to the spacing between atoms, so the rows of atoms in a crystal scatter them into a pattern of sharp spots. The pattern encodes where the atoms are.

Bragg's lawEnters 1912 – 1913

Waves reflected from parallel planes of atoms reinforce each other only at angles where nλ=2dsin⁡θn\lambda = 2d\sin\theta. Measuring the angles gives the spacing dd between the planes.

Structure determinationEnters 1945 – 1969

Working back from the spots of a diffraction pattern to a three-dimensional map of electron density, and so to the position of every atom in a molecule.

QuasicrystalEnters 1982 – 1984

A solid whose atoms are ordered but never repeat exactly. Its diffraction pattern is sharp, yet shows symmetries, such as fivefold, that no repeating lattice can have.

Draws on other domains

Chapter I

Shapes Without Atoms

Crystals have flat faces that meet at fixed angles. A quartz crystal from the Alps and one from Brazil have the same angles between the same faces, whatever their size. In 1784 René Just Haüy found that calcite always breaks into smaller rhombs of the same shape. He proposed that a crystal is a stack of identical tiny blocks, and that its faces are the stepped edges of the stack.

Nobody could see the blocks, so the next advances were mathematical. Which repeating patterns are possible at all? In 1848 Auguste Bravais showed that there are exactly 14 kinds of lattice, the grid of points at which a pattern repeats. In 1891 Evgraf Fedorov and Arthur Schoenflies counted every combination of lattice and symmetry, and found 230, a result of Euclidean geometry. One rule stood out. A repeating pattern can have twofold, threefold, fourfold or sixfold rotational symmetry, but never fivefold, just as regular pentagons cannot tile a floor.

Chapter II

X-Rays Meet Crystals

X-rays were discovered in 1895, and for years no one knew whether they were particles or waves. In 1912 Max von Laue in Munich reasoned that if they were very short waves, the regular rows of atoms in a crystal should scatter them the way closely ruled lines scatter light. Walter Friedrich and Paul Knipping tried it with a crystal of copper sulphate and found a pattern of spots. X-rays were waves, and crystals were lattices, as the theory of electromagnetism and the crystallographers had both supposed.

Laue's own analysis of the spots was complicated. That autumn William Lawrence Bragg, a 22-year-old student at Cambridge, found a far simpler picture. Each plane of atoms reflects a little of the beam, and the reflections from many parallel planes add up only at particular angles. His father, William Henry Bragg, built an instrument to measure those angles precisely. In 1913 the Braggs solved rock salt and diamond. In salt, each sodium atom sits among six chlorine atoms and each chlorine among six sodium atoms, with nothing that could be called a molecule of sodium chloride. Some chemists found this hard to accept. They shared the 1915 Nobel prize, although the son felt for years that the public credited his father with his law.

Chapter III

Molecules Made Visible

The method spread from minerals to chemistry. In 1929 Kathleen Lonsdale showed that the benzene ring, the backbone of organic chemistry, is flat. Solving larger molecules was a matter of heavy calculation, since the diffraction spots record how strongly each set of planes reflects but not the timing, or phase, of the reflected waves. Crystallographers found ways round this, such as adding a heavy atom as a marker.

Dorothy Hodgkin pushed the method furthest. She solved penicillin in 1945, which showed chemists the unusual ring at the heart of the drug, then vitamin B12 in 1956, with the help of some of the first electronic computers. Insulin took her 34 years and was finished in 1969. Meanwhile X-ray photographs of DNA fibres helped reveal the double helix, and Max Perutz and John Kendrew solved the first protein structures, the start of molecular biology as a science of shapes.

In 1982 the rules themselves were broken. Dan Shechtman saw a sharp diffraction pattern with tenfold symmetry in a rapidly cooled alloy of aluminium and manganese. The symmetry was forbidden for any repeating lattice. By his own account, his group leader asked him to leave, and Linus Pauling is reported to have said that there were no quasicrystals, only quasi-scientists. But others reproduced the result, and theorists explained it as order without repetition, like a Penrose tiling. In 1992 the definition of a crystal was changed to fit.

Chapter IV

A Closer Look: Reading Rock Salt

X-rays reflected from two neighbouring planes of atoms, a distance dd apart, travel paths that differ by 2dsin⁡θ2d\sin\theta, where θ\theta is the angle between the beam and the planes. The reflections reinforce only when that difference is a whole number of wavelengths:

nλ=2dsin⁡θ.n\lambda = 2d\sin\theta .

The Braggs could measure angles, but to get distances they needed one length to start from. They took it from the density of salt. A cube of rock salt with side aa holds four sodium and four chlorine atoms. Salt's density is 2.165 g/cm³ and a mole of NaCl weighs 58.44 g, so

a3=4×58.442.165×6.022×1023 cm3,a≈5.64×10−8 cm=5.64 A˚.a^3 = \frac{4 \times 58.44}{2.165 \times 6.022 \times 10^{23}} \ \text{cm}^3, \qquad a \approx 5.64 \times 10^{-8} \ \text{cm} = 5.64 \ \text{Å} .

One ångström, Å, is 10−1010^{-10} m. With the spacing known, the angles give the X-ray wavelength, and after that any crystal can be measured.

Take the X-rays used in most laboratories today, from copper, with λ=1.5406\lambda = 1.5406 Å. The planes in salt that hold alternate layers of sodium and chlorine are a/2=2.82a/2 = 2.82 Å apart. Other sets of planes cut the cube at slants:

PlanesSpacing dd (Å)sin⁡θ\sin\theta for n=1n = 1Angle θ\theta
(111), across the cube's corner3.2560.236613.68°
(200), parallel to a face2.8200.273215.85°
(220), across a face diagonal1.9940.386322.72°

For the (200) planes, the second and third orders, n=2n = 2 and n=3n = 3, appear at 33.11° and 55.03°. A fourth order would need sin⁡θ>1\sin\theta > 1, so it does not exist.

The same arithmetic shows why visible light cannot do this. Green light has λ≈5000\lambda \approx 5000 Å, and reflecting it from planes 2.82 Å apart would need sin⁡θ≈890\sin\theta \approx 890. Only waves shorter than 2d=5.642d = 5.64 Å can be reflected at all. X-rays, with wavelengths near one ångström, are the right size for atoms.

Chapter V

From Salt to Proteins

Crystallography grew from a branch of mineralogy into the basic tool for seeing matter at the scale of atoms. It showed physicists the lattices through which electrons move, the starting point of solid-state physics. It gave chemists the shapes of molecules and biologists the shapes of proteins. Neutrons and electrons are now diffracted as well as X-rays, and electron microscopes can image single frozen proteins. Yet the simplest question, which crystal a given molecule will form, still cannot be answered reliably in advance.

Applications

Where it is used

  • Structural biology↗ Biology · Biochemistry

    A library of protein structures

    The Protein Data Bank holds over two hundred thousand molecular structures, most of them solved by X-ray crystallography. Drug designers use them to shape molecules that fit an enzyme's active site, and in 2020 they supplied the training data for AlphaFold, which predicts protein structures from sequence alone.

    › Sources (2)
    • Berman, H. M. et al. (2000). The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research 28(1): 235–242.
    • Jumper, J. et al. (2021). Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596: 583–589.
  • Geometry↗ Mathematics · Euclidean Geometry

    Penrose tilings and quasicrystals

    In the 1970s Roger Penrose found two shapes of tile that cover the plane only in patterns that never repeat, with fivefold symmetry everywhere. Alan Mackay showed in 1982 that such a pattern would diffract into sharp spots. Shechtman's quasicrystals turned a recreational curiosity of tiling theory into real matter, and renewed mathematical interest in aperiodic order.

    › Sources (1)
    • Gardner, M. (1977). Extraordinary nonperiodic tiling that enriches the theory of tiles. Scientific American 236(1): 110–121.
  • Pharmaceuticals

    The drug that changed its crystal

    In 1998 the HIV drug ritonavir began to fail in its capsules. A new, less soluble crystal form had appeared that no one had seen in development, and once it existed the old form became almost impossible to make. The drug had to be reformulated. Screening for polymorphs is now a routine step in drug development.

    › Sources (1)
    • Bauer, J. et al. (2001). Ritonavir: an extraordinary example of conformational polymorphism. Pharmaceutical Research 18(6): 859–866.

Open problems

Where the map runs out

Open

Predicting a crystal from its molecule

Open as of 2026; computer predictions now often succeed for small, rigid molecules, but not reliably.

Given a molecule, which crystal will it form? Many molecules can pack in several different ways, called polymorphs, with different solubility, strength and colour. In 1988 the editor of Nature called the inability to predict crystal structures one of the continuing scandals of the physical sciences.

Why it is hard

Rival packings often differ in energy by less than the errors of the best calculations, and which one actually grows can depend on how fast the crystal forms, the solvent and traces of impurity. The number of possible packings to search is enormous.

What resolving it unlocks

Drugs and materials designed on a computer with the right crystal form from the start, and no more surprise polymorphs appearing after a medicine is on the market.

› Sources (2)

Further reading

  1. Authier, A. (2013). Early Days of X-ray Crystallography. Oxford University Press.

    A detailed history of the discoveries of 1912–1913 and what came before them.

  2. Jenkin, J. (2008). William and Lawrence Bragg, Father and Son: The Most Extraordinary Collaboration in Science. Oxford University Press.

    A double biography, including the strain the shared credit put on them.

  3. Ferry, G. (1998). Dorothy Hodgkin: A Life. Granta Books.

    A biography of the crystallographer who solved the molecules of medicine.