01
Not the Language of Cusco
Quechua is often thought of as the language of the Inca, but its greatest diversity lies in central Peru, in the highlands of Ancash, Huánuco and Junín and on the coast near Lima. By the usual reasoning of historical linguistics, that is where it began. Alfredo Torero and Gary Parker showed in the 1960s that the varieties fall into two groups, Quechua I in the centre and Quechua II around it, north and south. The Inca, whose own court language may originally have been something else, adopted a southern variety of Quechua II as the common language of their empire in the 15th century.
02
Quechua and Aymara
Quechua and the Aymaran languages have been neighbours for well over a thousand years. They share much of their vocabulary, a nearly identical sound system and very similar agglutinative grammar, built entirely with suffixes. Some scholars have therefore grouped them as 'Quechumaran'. Most specialists now think the resemblances come from long, intense contact, because the shared words do not show the regular sound correspondences expected of inherited vocabulary.
Where its languages are spoken
- Peru
- Bolivia
- Ecuador
- Argentina
- Colombia
- Chile
Turning points
- SplitContested
Quechua I and Quechua II
Proto-Quechua divides into a central group (Quechua I) and a peripheral group (Quechua II), which later spreads north and south along the Andes. The date and exact homeland, coast or highlands, are debated.
Sources (2)
- Contact
Centuries beside Aymara
Quechua and Aymaran speakers live side by side in the central and southern Andes, exchanging vocabulary and converging in sound system and grammar until the two families look deceptively alike.
Sources (1)
Contested classifications
- Minority position
Quechumaran
Evidence for
The two families share perhaps a fifth or more of their basic vocabulary, almost the same consonant inventory, and parallel suffix-based grammar. Orr and Longacre (1968) proposed a genetic relationship on this basis.
Evidence against
Much of the shared vocabulary is identical rather than regularly corresponding, which points to borrowing, and the grammatical suffixes that carry the most weight in proving relationship mostly differ. Cerrón-Palomino and others explain the similarities as the result of centuries of contact.
Sources (2)