01
Origins
West Semitic takes in every Semitic language except Akkadian and Eblaite. It is defined mainly by a change in the verb: the suffixed form that Akkadian used for states ('he is seated') became a general past tense, which is why kataba in Arabic and kātav in Hebrew mean 'he wrote'. The branch divides into Central Semitic (Arabic, Aramaic, Hebrew and their relatives) and the Semitic languages of the Horn of Africa and southern Arabia.
Many of its speakers were herders and traders on the desert edge, and it is among them that writing took its most consequential step.
02
The First Alphabet
Around 1900–1800 BCE, Semitic-speaking workers in Egypt and Sinai adapted a small set of Egyptian hieroglyphs to write their own language. Each sign stood for the first consonant of its Semitic name: a picture of an ox head (ʾalp) for ʾ, a house (bayt) for b. The earliest examples, from Wadi el-Hol in Egypt and Serabit el-Khadim in Sinai, are short and hard to read, but the principle, one sign for one consonant, spread. Through Phoenician it became the ancestor of the Greek, Latin, Hebrew and Arabic scripts. The South Arabian branch of the same invention produced the Ge'ez script of Ethiopia.
Where its languages are spoken
- Egypt
- Ethiopia
- Sudan
- Algeria
- Iraq
- Yemen
- Morocco
- Saudi Arabia
17 more countries
- Syria
- Tunisia
- Jordan
- Israel
- Libya
- Lebanon
- Palestine
- Eritrea
- Oman
- Chad
- Kuwait
- Malta
- Germany
- Iran
- Sweden
- Turkey
- United States
Turning points
- SplitContested
West Semitic divides
West Semitic separates into Central Semitic and the southern languages of Arabia and the Horn of Africa. The internal structure of the southern group is uncertain, and the date is approximate.
Sources (1)
- WritingContested
The first alphabet
Semitic speakers in Egypt and Sinai use hieroglyph shapes for the first consonant of their Semitic names (ox head ʾalp → ʾ). The Wadi el-Hol and Serabit el-Khadim inscriptions are the earliest known alphabetic writing. Their exact date and readings are debated.
Sources (1)
Contested classifications
- Widely accepted
South Semitic
Evidence for
These languages keep the old imperfective pattern (Ge'ez yəqättəl) that Central Semitic replaced, share some vocabulary, and are neighbours across the Red Sea. Most handbooks group them together.
Evidence against
Keeping an old form is not a shared innovation, and Huehnergard and Rubin find few changes that only these languages share. Old South Arabian may be closer to Central Semitic. For this reason the tree draws Ethiosemitic and both South Arabian groups directly from West Semitic, without a South Semitic node.
Sources (1)