01
Old Chinese
Chinese writing begins with the oracle-bone inscriptions of the Shang dynasty at Anyang, around 1250 BCE: questions to the ancestors cut into ox bones and turtle shells. The characters record words, not sounds. Old Chinese pronunciation has to be reconstructed from the rhymes of the Book of Odes, the sound elements inside characters, loanwords and the modern varieties, in work from Bernhard Karlgren to William Baxter and Laurent Sagart. In 221 BCE the Qin dynasty standardised the script across the empire.
Old Chinese was not tonal. André-Georges Haudricourt showed, as he had for Vietnamese, that the Middle Chinese 'rising' tone came from a final glottal stop and the 'departing' tone from a final -s, which is why Chinese and Vietnamese developed such similar tone systems.
02
Many Chinese Languages
The spoken varieties of Chinese are as different from one another as the Romance languages, and speakers of Cantonese and Mandarin cannot understand each other. Min, spoken in Fujian and Taiwan, split off earliest and keeps distinctions older than the 7th-century Qieyun rhyme dictionary on which Middle Chinese reconstruction is based. The southern varieties are more conservative in other ways: Cantonese keeps the final -p, -t and -k that northern Mandarin lost by the 14th century, so 'ten' is Cantonese sap but Mandarin shí.
03
Vernacular, Characters and Pinyin
For two thousand years educated Chinese wrote in Classical Chinese, far from the spoken language. In the New Culture movement of 1917–1919, Hu Shi and others argued for writing in the vernacular (báihuà), and within a decade it had become the norm. In the 1950s the People's Republic promoted Mandarin (Pǔtōnghuà) as the national standard, simplified the characters (1956), and adopted pinyin, a Latin alphabet devised under Zhou Youguang (1958), for teaching pronunciation. Pinyin is now the standard way of typing Chinese.
In its own words
床前明月光
- chuáng
- qián
- míng
- yuè
- guāng
Sources (1)
Where it’s spoken
- Taiwan
- Hong Kong
- Malaysia
- United States
- Singapore
- China
Turning points
- Writing
Oracle-bone inscriptions
Shang dynasty diviners at Anyang carve questions and answers onto bones and shells. They are the earliest substantial Chinese writing, already a developed logographic system.
Sources (1)
- Writing
The Qin standardise the script
After unifying China, the Qin dynasty imposes a single standard form of the characters on the regional scripts of the Warring States. A common written language across speech varieties is a unifying force from then on.
Sources (1)
- Sound lawContested
Tones from lost final consonants
The final glottal stop of Old Chinese becomes the Middle Chinese 'rising' tone, and final -s becomes the 'departing' tone. Later the loss of voiced initials splits the tones further. When the tones arose is debated.
Compare with other stress and prosody across families →
Sources (2)
- Sound law
Mandarin loses its final stops
Northern Chinese loses the final -p, -t and -k, and the syllables they ended are redistributed among other tones, as recorded in the Zhongyuan Yinyun rhyme book of 1324. Cantonese and other southern varieties keep them (Cantonese sap, Mandarin shí 'ten').
Compare with other loss across families →
Sources (1)
- Revitalization
Writing as people speak
Hu Shi and the New Culture movement campaign to replace Classical Chinese with the vernacular (báihuà) as the written language, and within a decade it becomes standard in literature, journalism and education.
Sources (1)
- Writing
Simplified characters and pinyin
The People's Republic introduces simplified characters (1956) and adopts pinyin (1958), a Latin alphabet for Mandarin developed by a committee led by Zhou Youguang. It is used for teaching, dictionaries and, today, typing.
Sources (1)
Contested classifications
- Widely accepted
Min as the first Chinese split
Evidence for
Min keeps distinctions, especially among consonants, that cannot be derived from the Middle Chinese of the Qieyun, so its ancestor must be older. Jerry Norman made the case in detail.
Evidence against
Some of the Min features can be explained as borrowings from non-Chinese languages or as later layers, and the Qieyun may itself be a composite of several varieties rather than one language. How to model the early history of Chinese dialects is still debated.
Sources (1)