01
Near the Homeland
The Bantu languages of the northwest, in Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea and Gabon (Guthrie's zones A and B), are the ones that moved least from the Proto-Bantu homeland. Phylogenetic studies do not find a single ancestor for them: they are several early offshoots, each branching off before the ancestors of the rest moved on. 'Northwest Bantu' is therefore a geographical label, drawn here as one limb for legibility.
In one respect many of them are the least typical Bantu languages. Their words have been worn down: stems reduced to a single syllable, final vowels dropped, noun-class prefixes shortened or merged. This is the opposite of what one might expect of the languages nearest the homeland.
02
Writing and Colonial Rule
Duala, the language of the port of Douala, was among the first Bantu languages of the region to be written. The English Baptist missionary Alfred Saker published a Duala New Testament in the 1860s. Cameroon passed from German to French and British rule, and French and English became the languages of state. Fang, spread across three countries, and Ewondo are regional lingua francas.
Where it’s spoken
- Cameroon
- Equatorial Guinea
- Gabon
- Republic of the Congo
Turning points
- SplitContested
The first offshoots
Groups settling in the forests of southern Cameroon and Gabon separate one by one from the Bantu that continues to spread. Their order is disputed, which is why no single Northwest Bantu ancestor is reconstructed.
Sources (1)
- Sound lawContested
Erosion of the word
In many Northwest Bantu languages final vowels are lost and stems shrink to one syllable, while noun-class prefixes shorten or merge. The changes differ from language to language and cannot be dated closely.
Compare with other loss across families →
Sources (1)
- Writing
Duala in print
Baptist missionaries at Douala write Duala in the Latin alphabet and publish scripture in it. For a time it is the main written African language of coastal Cameroon.
Sources (1)
Contested classifications
- Largely rejected
Northwest Bantu as a single branch
Evidence for
The languages are neighbours, share many areal features such as reduced word shapes, and are often grouped together in surveys for convenience.
Evidence against
Lexicostatistical and phylogenetic studies consistently find them to be a series of early, separate splits from the Bantu trunk, not a single subgroup. The features they share are largely retentions from Proto-Bantu or the result of contact between neighbours.
Sources (1)