01
Origins
Proto-Dravidian has been reconstructed from about eighty languages, largely through Thomas Burrow and Murray Emeneau's Dravidian Etymological Dictionary and Bhadriraju Krishnamurti's comparative grammar. Its speakers had words for farming, cattle, and village life. It had an unusual three-way contrast of consonants made with the tongue at the teeth, the gum ridge and curled back (retroflex), as in ṇ and ḷ. It built words only by adding suffixes: Tamil kaṇ-kaḷ-il 'in the eyes'.
Where and when it was spoken is uncertain. A computational study (Kolipakam et al. 2018) dated the family to about 4,500 years ago. Some scholars place the homeland in the south or centre of the peninsula, others in the northwest. The idea that the Indus Valley civilisation (c. 2600–1900 BCE) spoke a Dravidian language, argued especially by Asko Parpola and Iravatham Mahadevan, cannot be tested until the Indus script is deciphered, if it ever is.
02
A Family Recognised
In 1816 the British administrator Francis Whyte Ellis showed that Telugu, Tamil, Kannada and Malayalam were related to one another and not descended from Sanskrit, as many assumed. Robert Caldwell's Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian Family of Languages (1856) established the family and its name, from Sanskrit drāviḍa, originally a name for the Tamil country.
03
The Branches
Following Krishnamurti, Dravidian has four subgroups. North Dravidian (Kurukh, Malto, and Brahui in Pakistan) and Central Dravidian (Kolami, Parji, Gadaba) are spoken by small, mostly tribal communities in central and eastern India. South-Central Dravidian (Telugu, Gondi, Kui) and South Dravidian I (Tamil, Malayalam, Kannada, Tulu) share a common South Dravidian ancestor, although the position of South-Central is disputed.
Where its languages are spoken
- India
- Sri Lanka
- Pakistan
- Malaysia
- Afghanistan
- Singapore
Turning points
- SplitContested
Proto-Dravidian breaks up
North, Central and South Dravidian begin to diverge. The date, around 2500 BCE in Bayesian estimates, and the homeland are both disputed. The Indus civilisation question hangs over any answer.
Sources (2)
- ContactContested
Meeting Indo-Aryan
As Indo-Aryan speakers move into northern India, the two families meet. Proposed Dravidian loanwords appear in Vedic Sanskrit, and Sanskrit's retroflex consonants are often attributed to a Dravidian substrate. Emeneau made this the classic case of South Asia as a linguistic area. How much of the evidence is borrowing and how much independent development is debated.
Sources (1)
Contested classifications
- Minority position
Elamo-Dravidian
Evidence for
David McAlpin (1981) proposed sound correspondences and shared suffixes between Elamite and Proto-Dravidian. A link would fit a western origin for Dravidian and the presence of Brahui in Balochistan.
Evidence against
Elamite is poorly understood and known only from cuneiform texts, and the proposed cognates are few and often semantically loose. Krishnamurti and others found the correspondences unconvincing. The proposal is still cited but not accepted.
Sources (2)