Skip to content
Language Lineage

Proto-Germanic

The First Germanic Consonant Shift (Grimm's and Verner's laws), followed by stress fixed on the first syllable of the root.

c. 500 BCE – c. 200 CE (reconstructed)Southern Scandinavia and the North German Plain
On this page
  1. Origins
  2. The Defining Sound Shift
  3. Stress and the Shape of Words
  4. Daughter Branches
  5. Where its languages are spoken
  6. Turning points
  7. Contested classifications

01

Origins

Proto-Germanic is not written down anywhere. It is reconstructed by the comparative method: line up Gothic, Old Norse, Old English, Old High German and their relatives, work out which differences are regular, and infer the ancestor that explains them all. Proto-Germanic's own ancestor, Proto-Indo-European, is the buried root of this tree and lies outside the scope of v1.

Most handbooks date the language to roughly the second half of the first millennium BCE and place it in southern Scandinavia and on the adjoining North German Plain. Attempts to match it with a specific archaeological culture, most often the Jastorf culture, are suggestive but unproven. Language and material culture do not have to travel together.

The oldest indirect evidence is borrowing. Finnic languages took over Germanic words early enough to keep sounds and endings that the daughter languages later lost. Finnish kuningas 'king' preserves something very close to reconstructed *kuningaz, and rengas 'ring' reflects *hringaz. Roman writers such as Tacitus later recorded Germanic tribal and personal names, but no continuous text.

02

The Defining Sound Shift

What makes a language Germanic rather than just Indo-European is one systematic reshuffling of the consonants, usually called Grimm's law. Every series of Indo-European stops moved one step:

  • voiceless stops became fricatives: *p *t *k → *f *θ *x
  • plain voiced stops became voiceless: *b *d *g → *p *t *k
  • voiced aspirates lost their aspiration: *bʰ *dʰ *gʰ → *β *ð *ɣ (later stops in many positions)

That is why Latin pater corresponds to English father, Latin decem to English ten, and Sanskrit bhrā́tar- to English brother. None of these words was borrowed. They are inherited cognates, and the consonants differ by rule, not by chance.

Grimm's law had exceptions. Gothic fadar 'father' has a d where the rule predicts þ (as in brōþar 'brother'). In 1877 Karl Verner showed that the exceptions were regular too: they depend on where the accent fell in the parent language. That result, Verner's law, was a landmark for the idea that sound change works without exceptions.

03

Stress and the Shape of Words

Indo-European had a free, mobile accent that could fall on almost any syllable. Proto-Germanic fixed it on the first syllable of the root. Verner's law must have acted before this happened, because it depends on the old accent position. That ordering is one of the firmest pieces of relative chronology in the reconstruction.

Fixed initial stress has had consequences ever since. Unstressed endings wore down generation after generation, which is part of why English and the Scandinavian languages have so little inflection left, and why alliteration (matching word-initial sounds) rather than rhyme became the backbone of early Germanic verse.

04

Daughter Branches

The traditional division has three branches: East Germanic (Gothic and its relatives), North Germanic (the Scandinavian languages) and West Germanic (English, Frisian, Dutch, German). The exact shape of the split is still debated. Many linguists think North and West Germanic went through a shared Northwest Germanic stage after the East Germanic speakers had moved away. A minority pairs Gothic with North Germanic instead. Both proposals appear under Contested Classifications below.

In the Germanic of the earliest runic inscriptions, from about the 2nd century CE, some of these splits are only just becoming visible.

On the map

Where its languages are spoken

SwitzerlandLuxembourgBelgiumNetherlandsDenmarkFaeroe Is.Liechtenstein
Spoken todayFormerly spokenShading marks whole countries, not the regions within them.
  1. United StatesAnglic c. 240 million
  2. GermanyFrisian c. 10,000 · Low German c. 2 million · High German c. 70 million
  3. United KingdomAnglic c. 60 million
  4. CanadaAnglic c. 20 million · Low German
  5. AustraliaAnglic c. 18 million
  6. NetherlandsFrisian c. 400,000 · Low German · Low Franconian c. 16 million
  7. South AfricaAnglic c. 5 million · Low Franconian c. 6.5 million
  8. SwedenEast Norse c. 9 million
26 more countries
  1. AustriaHigh German c. 8 million
  2. BelgiumLow Franconian c. 6.5 million
  3. DenmarkEast Norse c. 5.5 million
  4. NorwayWest Norse c. 5 million
  5. SwitzerlandHigh German c. 5 million
  6. IrelandAnglic c. 4 million
  7. New ZealandAnglic c. 4 million
  8. IcelandWest Norse c. 350,000
  9. FinlandEast Norse c. 300,000
  10. ItalyEast Germanic · High German c. 300,000
  11. LuxembourgHigh German c. 300,000
  12. NamibiaLow Franconian c. 200,000
  13. Faroe IslandsWest Norse c. 50,000
  14. LiechtensteinHigh German c. 35,000
  15. BoliviaLow German
  16. FranceEast Germanic · High German
  17. MexicoLow German
  18. ParaguayLow German
  19. SurinameLow Franconian
  20. BulgariaformerlyEast Germanic
  21. PolandformerlyEast Germanic
  22. PortugalformerlyEast Germanic
  23. RomaniaformerlyEast Germanic
  24. SpainformerlyEast Germanic
  25. TunisiaformerlyEast Germanic
  26. UkraineformerlyEast Germanic

Figures are rough first-language estimates, rounded, from censuses and Ethnologue. Counts for small or scattered communities are especially uncertain.

Rings along the limb

Turning points

Oldest first.

  1. Sound lawc. 500 BCE (relative chronology secure; absolute date debated)Contested

    Grimm's law

    *p *t *k → *f *θ *x · *b *d *g → *p *t *k · *bʰ *dʰ *gʰ → *β *ð *ɣ

    The First Germanic Consonant Shift. PIE voiceless stops became fricatives (*p → *f), voiced stops became voiceless (*d → *t), and voiced aspirates became voiced fricatives (*bʰ → *β). Latin piscis : English fish; Latin duo : English two. Its absolute date is inferred from loanwords and is disputed. Credit is disputed too: Rask described the correspondences in 1818, and Grimm's 1822 formulation made them famous.

    Figures · Rasmus Rask (1787–1832), Jacob Grimm (1785–1863)

    Compare with other consonant shifts across families →

    Sources (3)
    • Rask, Rasmus. 1818. Undersøgelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprindelse. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
    • Grimm, Jacob. 1822. Deutsche Grammatik, vol. 1, 2nd ed. Göttingen: Dieterich.
    • Ringe, Don. 2017. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Sound lawAfter Grimm's law, before stress was fixed

    Verner's law

    *f *θ *x *s → *β *ð *ɣ *z / after an unaccented syllable

    Voiceless fricatives (*f *θ *x *s) became voiced (*β *ð *ɣ *z) inside a word when the preceding syllable was unaccented in the inherited accent system. It explains Gothic fadar (PIE accent after the consonant) against brōþar (accent before it), and the alternation still visible in English was : were, where *z later became r.

    Figures · Karl Verner (1846–1896)

    Compare with other weakening and voicing across families →

    Sources (2)
    • Verner, Karl. 1877. Eine Ausnahme der ersten Lautverschiebung. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 23: 97–130.
    • Ringe, Don. 2017. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Sound lawLate Proto-Germanic

    Stress fixed on the root

    σ σ ˈσ → ˈσ σ σ (stress fixed on the root's first syllable)

    The mobile Indo-European accent was replaced by fixed stress on the first syllable of the root. It sets up the long erosion of unstressed endings in every daughter branch.

    Compare with other stress and prosody across families →

    Sources (1)
    • Fulk, R. D. 2018. A Comparative Grammar of the Early Germanic Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  4. ContactLast centuries BCE

    Celtic loanwords

    Words tied to rank and metalwork entered from neighbouring Celtic: *rīk- 'ruler' (Gothic reiks), from Celtic rīx, and *ambahtaz 'servant' (Gothic andbahts), from Gaulish ambactos. Their Celtic sound shapes date them to a period of close contact before the Roman expansion.

    Sources (2)
    • Ringe, Don. 2017. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Harbert, Wayne. 2007. The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Contact1st century BCE – 4th century CE

    Roman frontier loans

    Trade along the Roman frontier brought Latin words into Germanic before the branches separated completely. Latin caupo 'petty trader' gave *kaupōn- 'to trade' (German kaufen, English cheap), vinum gave *wīna- 'wine', and Caesar gave *kaisar- (Gothic kaisar, German Kaiser).

    Sources (1)
    • Harbert, Wayne. 2007. The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Splitc. 1st century BCE – 2nd century CEContested

    Breakup into branches

    As East Germanic groups moved south-east towards the Vistula and beyond, the remaining dialects diverged. Both the timing and the shape of the split are debated: a clean three-way split, a Northwest Germanic stage, or a Gotho-Nordic pairing.

    Sources (2)
    • Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1989. The Germanic Languages: Origins and Early Dialectal Interrelations. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
    • Fulk, R. D. 2018. A Comparative Grammar of the Early Germanic Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  7. WritingBy the 2nd century CEContested

    Elder Futhark runes

    A 24-letter runic alphabet appears, with early secure inscriptions such as the Vimose comb (Funen, Denmark, c. 160 CE). It was adapted from a Mediterranean alphabet, but scholars disagree whether the model was Latin or one of the North Italic alphabets. The language of the oldest inscriptions is variously labelled late Proto-Germanic, Northwest Germanic or Proto-Norse.

    Sources (1)
    • Barnes, Michael P. 2012. Runes: A Handbook. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.

Outside the tree

Contested classifications

These disagreements may never be settled. Each position is given with its grounds, and no side is declared correct.

  • Widely accepted

    Northwest Germanic

    North and West Germanic share an intermediate ancestor after East Germanic split off

    Would join · North Germanic + West Germanic

    Evidence for

    North and West Germanic share changes that Gothic lacks. The long vowel *ē was lowered to ā (Gothic mēna 'moon' against Old Norse máni, Old High German māno), and the old reduplicating past tenses were remodelled (Gothic haíhait 'was called' against Old Norse hét, Old High German hiaz). The oldest runic inscriptions fit a language ancestral to both.

    Evidence against

    The shared features could have spread across a dialect continuum after the split instead of being inherited from one ancestor. Some, such as i-umlaut, clearly worked out differently in each branch. Scholars who favour a Gotho-Nordic pairing, or a flat three-way split, read the same evidence differently.

    Sources (2)
    • Nielsen, Hans Frede. 1989. The Germanic Languages: Origins and Early Dialectal Interrelations. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
    • Ringe, Don & Ann Taylor. 2014. The Development of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Largely rejected

    Germanic substrate hypothesis

    much of Proto-Germanic's vocabulary, and its consonant shift, come from a non-Indo-European population that adopted an Indo-European language

    Evidence for

    A noticeable group of common Germanic words, many to do with the sea and seafaring, has no secure Indo-European etymology. Feist also argued that a change as sweeping as Grimm's law looked like the result of a foreign population learning Indo-European.

    Evidence against

    Many of the supposedly isolated words have since been given plausible Indo-European etymologies. The share of words without an etymology is not unusual for an Indo-European branch. No source language has been identified, and consonant shifts of this kind can happen without language shift. Variants of the idea (for example Vennemann's proposals) survive only as minority views.

    Sources (2)
    • Feist, Sigmund. 1932. The origin of the Germanic languages and the Europeanization of North Europe. Language 8(4): 245–254.
    • Ringe, Don. 2017. From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.