Bitung, Sulawesi Utara
Mixed, mainly semidiurnal- Period
- 01 Jan 2026 — 01 Agu 2026212 days
- Datum
- Nol sensor stasiun (bukan MSL)
- gaps
- 27707 jam
- Source
- IOC Sea Level Station Monitoring Facility (UNESCO/IOC & VLIZ)
Source, licence and datum notes
IOC menyajikan data mentah terhadap nol sensor masing-masing stasiun. Tinggi di sini tidak merujuk MSL, LAT, maupun chart datum.
Licence: Akses terbuka dengan kewajiban sitasi (VLIZ/IOC, DOI 10.14284/482)
Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ); Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) (2026): Sea level station monitoring facility. https://www.ioc-sealevelmonitoring.org — DOI 10.14284/482
Not for navigationThe official Indonesian tide tables are published by Pushidrosal.
Constituents
Harmonic constituents
- Condition number κ
- 1.65good
- Residual RMS
- 0.0758 m
- Mean level Z₀
- 7.8795 m
- Record length
- 212.0 days
| Constituent | Amplitude H (m) | Phase g (°) | Lag (h) | Speed (°/h) | Period (h) | Nodal factor f | Nodal correction u (°) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M2255.555 | 0.3414±0.0017 | 277.0±0.3 | 9.56 | 28.984104 | 12.421 | 0.9663 | 0.85 |
| S2273.555 | 0.2254±0.0017 | 314.5±0.4 | 10.48 | 30.000000 | 12.000 | 1.0000 | 0.00 |
| K1165.555 | 0.2077±0.0015 | 310.1±0.4 | 20.62 | 15.041069 | 23.934 | 1.1057 | 3.09 |
| O1145.555 | 0.1201±0.0014 | 291.2±0.7 | 20.89 | 13.943036 | 25.819 | 1.1710 | -3.50 |
| K2275.555 | 0.0677±0.0013 | 307.4±1.1 | 10.22 | 30.082137 | 11.967 | 1.2919 | 6.60 |
| P1163.555 | 0.0630±0.0017 | 309.5±1.5 | 20.69 | 14.958931 | 24.066 | 1.0000 | 0.00 |
| N2245.655 | 0.0508±0.0017 | 269.5±1.9 | 9.47 | 28.439730 | 12.658 | 0.9663 | 0.85 |
| Q1135.655 | 0.0251±0.0014 | 287.6±3.2 | 21.47 | 13.398661 | 26.868 | 1.1710 | -3.50 |
| M4455.555 | 0.0072±0.0017 | 170.0±13.8 | 2.93 | 57.968208 | 6.210 | 0.9338 | 1.70 |
| MS4473.555 | 0.0060±0.0017 | 258.4±16.0 | 4.38 | 58.984104 | 6.103 | 0.9663 | 0.85 |
H is half the height of that constituent’s wave; g is how late it arrives behind the Moon or Sun, and the column beside it says the same thing in hours — g divided by the constituent’s speed. f and u are the 18.6-year corrections, applied and still shown.
The ± figure is one standard error, taken from the diagonal of the solve’s covariance matrix. It assumes the record’s noise is independent from hour to hour, and tidal residuals are not: weather lasts for days, so neighbouring hours are wrong in the same direction. The true uncertainty is larger than what is printed here — by how much, this site does not compute.
The geometry
How alike these constituents look to the record
The most nearly parallel pair in this record: K1 / P1 (0.262).
| M2 | S2 | N2 | K2 | K1 | O1 | P1 | Q1 | M4 | MS4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M2 | — | |||||||||
| S2 | 0.03 | — | ||||||||
| N2 | 0.04 | 0.01 | — | |||||||
| K2 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.01 | — | ||||||
| K1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | |||||
| O1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | — | ||||
| P1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.04 | — | |||
| Q1 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | — | ||
| M4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | — | |
| MS4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | — |
- all but indistinguishable≥ 0.9
- strong≥ 0.6
- moderate≥ 0.3
- slight≥ 0.1
- negligible≥ 0.0
Computed from the design matrix that was actually solved, so it sees the record’s real sample times rather than only its span, which is all the Rayleigh criterion sees. What matters is not how many hours are missing but where: one long outage cuts the effective span and lets a hard pair collapse back together, while the same number of hours missing at scattered times costs almost nothing. Björck & Golub 1973.
The 18.61-year cycle
What f is actually correcting for
- M2f 0.966 ±4%
- K1f 1.106 ±12%
- O1f 1.171 ±19%
- K2f 1.292 ±28%
- N2f 0.966 ±4%
- Q1f 1.171 ±19%
- M4f 0.934 ±7%
- MS4f 0.966 ±4%
- range of f over one cycle
- where this record sits
- f = 1, if the node were ignored
Solar constituents do not follow the lunar node at all — f = 1 and u = 0, for all time: S2, P1.
The reported amplitude H has f divided out, so it does not depend on the cycle; the wave actually in the water is H·f. That is why f and u are recomputed at prediction time rather than carried forward from the fit window — a harmonic constant is a constant with respect to an epoch, and copying one without its epoch is the kind of error that never shows in the output. Series from Schureman 1958, SP 98, table 14.
Tidal character
Formzahl number and tide type
Formzahl F
0.578
Mixed, mainly semidiurnal
F = (K1 + O1) / (M2 + S2) = (0.208 + 0.120) / (0.341 + 0.225)
Published values, for comparison
- Segara Anakan0.557
- Teluk Balikpapan0.370
- Teluk Banten—
- Tanjung Priok—
The published values above are for comparison only. Not one of them is an input to any number computed on this page.
Shallow water
The rise and the fall are not the same length
The flood is faster
The water rises in less time than it falls. Flood currents run stronger and shorter, ebb currents weaker and longer.
The tide as it runs
M4/M2 ratio
0.0211
Relative phase 2g(M2) − g(M4)
24°
From M2 and M4 alone — Time to rise
6.14h
From M2 and M4 alone — Time to fall
6.28h
Interactive
Constituent explorer
Semidiurnal
Diurnal
Shallow water
Computing…