conquest1147Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)
How it was governed
4 of 4 coded
Army raised byHow the fighting force was recruited, not how it fought.
tribal levy andslave soldier
tribal levy — Contingents raised through kin or tribal structures the ruler did not create
slave soldier — Purchased unfree troops attached to the ruler personally
Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)
Revenue fromWhat the state lived on. The values are unranked: the field cannot express which mattered most.
trade toll andland tax
trade toll — Customs, straits dues and caravan levies
land tax — Tax on agricultural production and land
Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)
Succession byThe rule in force, not the outcome. A rule repeatedly violated is still the rule.
nomination
A designated heir
Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)
Right to rule fromThe ground publicly asserted — on coins, in the khutba, in titles.
divine sanction
A mandate from above — heaven, or a claim to be mahdi or imam
Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)
Each line is drawn from a source that addresses the question directly. A line reads No cited figure where no source consulted does — never because the answer seemed obvious.
Turning points
3 hinges
1055Both ends of the gold roadsiege
Awdaghust in 1054 and Sijilmasa in 1055 were taken before Morocco was, which gave a desert movement a bullion supply before it had a country. Everything the dynasty did afterwards was paid for out of the trans- Saharan trade, and the resulting dinar was reliable enough to circulate in Christian Spain and be imitated there.
Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)
1086Sagrajasbattle
Yusuf ibn Tashfin beat Alfonso VI after the taifa kings invited him across the strait, then went home — and came back to depose the kings who had invited him, on a legal opinion that rulers paying tribute to Christians had forfeited authority. Al-Andalus was governed from Marrakesh for the next sixty years.
Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)
1147Marrakeshsiege
Abd al-Mu'min took the city the dynasty had built for itself, and the boy who had been raised to the throne a few months earlier was killed in front of him with his household. What survived was a branch of the family on the Balearic islands, which went on making war in Ifriqiya until the 1230s under the name of the woman its founder had married.
Khaldun, Histoire des Berbères et des dynasties musulmanes de l'Afrique septentrionale (1852)
Chapters
8 in order
From the Sahara
Drafted from Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)formation
The Almoravids began among the Sanhaja Berber confederations of the western
Sahara — veiled, camel-borne, and controlling the northern end of the gold routes
out of the Sudan. A scholar named Abd Allah ibn Yasin was invited to teach them
Maliki law in the 1040s and built a disciplined religious-military movement out
of the result. The name is usually derived from ribat, the frontier
fortress-monastery, though the etymology is disputed.
Under Yusuf ibn Tashfin they took Morocco, founded Marrakesh, and were then
invited across the strait. The Cordoban caliphate had collapsed in 1031 into the
taifa kingdoms — a few dozen small states, several of them paying tribute to
Christian rulers to be left alone — and after Alfonso VI took Toledo in 1085 the
taifa kings asked for help.
Yusuf beat Alfonso at Sagrajas in 1086, went home, came back, and then deposed
the taifa kings one after another on the grounds that rulers who paid tribute to
Christians and taxed Muslims illegally had forfeited their authority. He had a
legal opinion from the jurists of Cordoba and one from Baghdad to that effect.
Al-Andalus was governed from Marrakesh for the next sixty years.
He who shall live will see
Drafted from al-Makkari, The History of the Mohammedan Dynasties in Spain (1843)expansion
In 1086 the king of Seville sent across the strait for an army, and the army
came. Al-Maqqari, compiling in the seventeenth century from Andalusi
historians whose own books are lost, preserves a long account of what followed,
and almost every detail in it is about a man taking the measure of another man.
Yusuf ibn Tashfin landed at Algeciras and marched to Seville in order, army
after army, general after general, tribe after tribe. Al-Mu'tamid rode out with
a hundred horsemen to meet him; a short way from the camp he put his horse to
a gallop, the camp saw it and came out, and the two of them dismounted and
embraced. Every king in al-Andalus either came to Seville himself or sent
somebody to stand in for him. The Africans, says the account, saw enough of the
splendour of royalty in that city to make them glad.
The camels
Ibn Khallikan, quoted in the same compilation, says Yusuf had camels shipped
over in such numbers that the country was filled with them and their cries
reached the sky. Nobody in al-Andalus had seen a camel. The horses would not
stand it: the sight of one of the animals, or the sound of it, was enough to
make a horse rear and throw its rider. Yusuf trained them to war and ringed his
camp with them, and in the battle they broke up the Christian cavalry.
That is a Saharan army solving an Iberian problem with the one asset a Saharan
army has, and it is a fair summary of why the crossing worked at all.
The letter
Alfonso VI wrote to Yusuf first — a letter composed for him, al-Maqqari says,
by a Muslim traitor, full of abuse and of inflated figures for the forces and
stores at his disposal. Yusuf gave it to his secretary Abu Bakr ibn
al-Qusayra, a learned and elegant writer, who withdrew and came back with a
long epistle full of rhetorical beauties. Yusuf had it read to him and said:
that answer is too long, bring me Alfonso's letter. On the back of the letter
he wrote six words.
He who shall live will see.
Before the battle he wrote once more, formally offering the three conditions
the law prescribes — Islam, tribute, or the sword — and adding that Alfonso had
once wished to come over to Africa and had regretted having no ships, and that
his wish was now granted, since here they were.
Sagrajas
The armies met near Badajoz — al-Maqqari, his translator notes, neglects to
give the date. Alfonso proposed, through al-Mu'tamid,
that since Friday was the Muslim holy day and Sunday the Christian one, the
battle should be fought on the Saturday between; al-Mu'tamid told Yusuf it was
a lie and that the attack would come on Friday, and it did.
It came at the Andalusians, and by design. Al-Mu'tamid's scouts had crept close
enough to the Christian camp to hear Alfonso explain his plan to his men: the
king of Seville understands Andalusian warfare and the Africans do not, so the
Africans are being guided by him, so break him first. They very nearly did.
Al-Mu'tamid was surrounded, took a sabre cut through his helmet into his skull,
another across his right hand and a spear in the thigh, had three horses killed
under him, and in the middle of it thought of a sick child he had left behind
in Seville and composed a verse about him. His own son gave way. He kept
looking towards the African camp and no troops came.
They came at the end, and not to him. Yusuf had told a general to wait until
al-Mu'tamid was fully engaged and then fall on Alfonso's camp and burn it. That
is what won the day.
Five years later Yusuf deposed him.
The secretary in the middle
Drafted from Khallikan, Biographical Dictionary (1842)expansion
Yusuf ibn Tashufin conquered Morocco, founded Marrakesh, crossed into Spain at
the invitation of its kings and took their kingdoms away from them, and he did
not know Arabic.
Ibn Khallikan, writing two centuries later, went looking for the fullest account
he could find and settled on a book whose author he could not name — only that
the man began it in 1183 and finished it at Mosul in the same year. What he
extracted from it is a story about translation.
How he got the job
The Almoravids came north out of the country next to the land of the Blacks
against the Zanata Berbers, who could not resist them, and took everything from
the gates of Tlemcen to the Atlantic. Their leader was Abu Bakr ibn Umar — a man,
Ibn Khallikan's source says, accustomed to a simple life, virtuous in conduct,
preferring his own country to the Maghreb and having no inclination for the
luxuries of life.
Then somebody told him about an old woman.
He was informed that an old woman in his own country had a female camel stolen
from her in a foray and begun to weep, exclaiming: "Abu Bakr ibn Umar has
ruined us by entering into the land of Maghreb!"
He went back south, and left as his lieutenant in the Maghreb a man called Yusuf
ibn Tashufin — brave, just and enterprising. Yusuf founded Marrakesh on a spot
where robbers used to lie in ambush, which belonged to an old Masmuda woman.
The empire that took al-Andalus was handed over by a man who went home because a
woman in the desert had lost a camel.
The letter
When the taifa kings learned that Yusuf meant to cross, they were frightened, and
Ibn Khallikan's source is exact about the shape of the fear. They had been using
his name for years to hold off the Christians — letting it be understood that
they might ally with him whenever the Franks pressed too hard — while dreading
that he might come and, on seeing their kingdoms, want them. They had heard what
his men did in battle: that the best of them would cut a horseman in two with a
single stroke and run several through with one lance.
So they wrote to him, and a Spanish secretary drafted it for them. It is a small
masterpiece of the chancery art:
If you let us alone, your conduct will be attributed, not to weakness but to
generosity, and if we obey your orders, our conduct will be attributed, not to
helplessness but to prudence. We therefore prefer the attribution which is the
more honourable for ourselves, hoping that you will prefer the attribution
which is the more honourable for you. The place which you hold is one in which
you should not let yourself be surpassed in noble acts.
What he was told it said
Yusuf did not know Arabic. His secretary, who had both languages, read it to him
in Berber, and what he said was not what the letter said.
He told him it came from the kings of al-Andalus, that they offered profound
respect, declared themselves partisans of his cause, and acknowledged his
authority. Then he supplied, in the kings' voice, a speech they had not made:
We are Muslims, come of a noble race; let us not therefore incur your
displeasure. It is for us a sufficient misfortune to have close behind us a
people of infidels. Our country is much straitened and cannot support numerous
armies. Spare us therefore, as you have spared the people of Maghreb who
acknowledged your authority.
The elaborate courtesy about attributions is gone. What is left is a frank
statement of weakness, an admission of overlordship, and a plea — which is the
version most likely to produce the answer the secretary wanted.
Yusuf asked him what he made of it, and got a lecture on kingship:
Every time that he bestows an ample gift, he increases his influence; increase
of influence consolidates his dominion, and when his dominion is consolidated,
people think it an honour to obey him; when obedience is felt to be an honour,
the people come unto him, and he is not obliged to encounter fatigues for the
purpose of reaching them, and he thus inherits the kingdom without ruining his
happiness in the next life. Know that it was said by a great king: "He who
bestows may command; he who commands may lead, and he who leads an army
becomes master of the land."
Yusuf, hearing this in his own language, understood its import and felt its
truth, and told him to draft the answer and read it back. The reply is four
sentences of warm and entirely non-committal goodwill — as long as you hold to
your engagements towards us, we shall hold to ours towards you — and it went off
with a present of Lamtuna shields, which Ibn Khallikan pauses to explain are made
only in one small town twenty days south of Sijilmasa and cannot be had anywhere
else.
The kings of al-Andalus, on receiving it, were filled with love for Yusuf and
extolled him highly, rejoiced at his friendship and at his having the Maghreb,
and resolved among themselves that if the king of the Franks did anything to
disquiet them, they would send for him.
What the arrangement was
Ibn Khallikan's source states it without embarrassment: It was thus that Yusuf,
by the good management of his secretary, obtained that which he wished for,
namely, the good-will of the people of al-Andalus; all that he wanted was an
opportunity of making war in their defence.
The opportunity came. Alfonso overran the country, the taifa kings feared for
their states, and al-Mu'tamid of Seville — who understood perfectly well what
calling in the Berbers would cost, and said so — wrote the letter that brought
the army across.
None of the correspondence that arranged it was read by the man it was addressed
to. He heard it, in a different language, from an employee who knew what he
wanted to hear.
The veil, and the city they had to build
Drafted from Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)peak
A movement came out of the western Sahara with a social order the settled
world found genuinely strange, and within thirty years was required to govern
the two most urbane provinces in the western Islamic world.
The strangeness was literal and contemporaries fixed on it. The Sanhaja of the
western Sahara were al-mulaththamun, the veiled ones: the men wore a face veil
and the women did not, which is the inverse of the practice in the cities they
came to rule and which Andalusi writers never stopped remarking on. Sanhaja
women moved and spoke freely, held property, and appear in the sources as
political figures — Zaynab al-Nafzawiyya, who married Yusuf ibn Tashfin, is
credited by the chroniclers with a substantial hand in the movement's early
politics and with the wealth that financed part of it.
The dynasty had no city, so it made one. Marrakesh was founded in the 1070s on
the plain below the High Atlas, at the point where the routes from the Sahara
reach the settled country — a garrison and a market rather than an inherited
capital, in the way Baghdad and Cairo had been built to order before it. It has
been a capital, on and off, ever since.
Then came al-Andalus, and the friction is the interesting part. The Almoravids
deposed the taifa kings on a legal argument — that rulers who paid tribute to
Christians and levied taxes the law did not permit had forfeited authority —
and they governed with the Maliki jurists of Cordoba and Fez at their shoulder.
That bought them legitimacy and cost them everything else. Andalusi poets and
courtiers, whose taifa patrons had been generous and cultivated, found their new
masters provincial; the jurists they deferred to were suspicious of speculative
theology and had al-Ghazali's Ihya burned in Cordoba and Marrakesh.
Within two generations the desert movement had become an urban dynasty with a
palace, an Andalusi chancery and a taste for the poetry it had arrived
disapproving of — and had lost the discipline that had made a few thousand
camel-borne Sanhaja able to take Morocco. That is the argument Ibn Tumart would
make against them from the Atlas, and he was not wrong about the facts.
The gold road
Drafted from Bennison, The Almoravid and Almohad Empires (2016)peak
The Almoravids began as a Saharan movement sitting on the northern end of the
trans-Saharan gold routes, and the gold is why they could pay for the rest.
West African gold from Bambuk and Bure moved north by camel to Sijilmasa and
Awdaghust and from there into the Mediterranean economy. Almoravid control of
both termini — they took Awdaghust in 1054 and Sijilmasa in 1055, before they
took Morocco — gave them a bullion supply that funded an army and produced a gold
dinar of such reliability that it circulated in Christian Spain and was imitated
there.
The southern end of the same system was the Sudanic empires — Ghana while the
Almoravids were rising, Mali afterwards — and Mansa Musa's pilgrimage two and a
half centuries later is the same gold moving up the same routes. The fiscal
history of the Maghreb and the political history of the western Sudan are one
subject, and nothing in either of them can be weighed without the other.
The dynasty's relationship with the scholars is worth a line. The Almoravids
enforced Maliki law strictly, deferred to its jurists, and were denounced by the
Almohads for exactly that — Ibn Tumart's charge was that a rigid attachment to
legal texts, at the expense of theology, had produced rulers who described God in
bodily terms. That is the doctrinal argument that ended them, and dynasties do
not often fall to an objection of that kind.
The doctors, and the mountain
Drafted from Khaldun, Histoire des Berbères et des dynasties musulmanes de l'Afrique septentrionale (1852)contraction
Ibn Khaldun sets the beginning of the end at a hearing. Ali ibn Yusuf, the
third Almoravid ruler, had governed fourteen years in unbroken good fortune
when a preacher out of the Anti-Atlas became a nuisance — a man who had studied
in the east, served for nothing as a legal consultant, and worked with
extraordinary zeal at the reform of morals. It had not gone well for him: he
had been roughly handled, Ibn Khaldun says, at Bougie, at Tlemcen and at
Meknes.
Ali summoned him to Marrakesh and put him in a room with the Almoravid doctors
of law. He argued with them, in Ibn Khaldun's phrase, and reduced them to
silence. Then he left for his own tribe, the Hargha.
Ali changed his mind about him afterwards and sent men after him. The Hargha
were told to hand their kinsman over and saw Almoravid troops behind the
demand; instead they made an alliance with the Hintata and the people of
Tinmallal, and all of them undertook to protect the Mahdi, to hold the true
religion and to spread it.
That is a state losing an argument in its own capital and then losing three
mountain confederations for the price of asking politely.
What the state was doing while that happened
Governing, competently, in the other direction. In the same years Ali crossed
the strait himself and besieged Toledo, saw the Aragonese take Tudela, and lost
Mallorca to a Christian fleet — Genoese, in Ibn Khaldun's account — and had it
recovered for him by an Almoravid general, appointed
his son Tashfin to the western half of al-Andalus with Cordoba and Seville for
residences, gave the eastern half to a governor at Valencia whose minister was
the philosopher Ibn Bajja, and handed Denia and the Balearic islands to a
Massufa chief called Ibn Ghaniya.
None of it was foolish. All of it was the wrong problem. Two years after the
Mahdi died his chief disciple Abd al-Mu'min took command under the terms of his
will, the Masmuda tribes attacked Marrakesh again and again, and while the
Lamtuna were being worn down in Spain the Almohad cause was being carried
through the Maghreb to the other Berber peoples.
Oran
Ali died in the 1140s and his son Tashfin succeeded him with both shores
hurrying to acknowledge him, at the moment when the Almohads had become
formidable and were bent on his destruction. When Abd al-Mu'min took his army
into the mountains, Tashfin followed on the flat below and reached Tlemcen.
The Almohads camped in the gorge that opens between the Two Rocks of the
mountain above the town and besieged him in it. A relief column sent by the
lord of Bougie charged them out of enthusiasm, was cut to pieces, and lost its
commander.
Tashfin got out to Oran, where he had arranged to meet his admiral and the
fleet. The Almohads followed and stormed the town. He was killed there — or,
Ibn Khaldun adds, by another account he disappeared and was not seen again. The
Rawd al-Qirtas gives a third version: that he came out at night with his
column to surprise the besiegers, was overwhelmed by their cavalry and
infantry, turned to flee across what he took for level ground in the dark, and
rode off a cliff above the sea by the ribat of Oran. His body was found on the
shore the next morning and his head was cut off and sent to Tinmallal.
Three accounts, one man, one night. Marrakesh fell within the year.
Marrakesh, 1147
Drafted from Khaldun, Histoire des Berbères et des dynasties musulmanes de l'Afrique septentrionale (1852)end
The Almoravid state was destroyed by an argument about the nature of God, and
the argument took about twenty-five years to arrive at the gate of the city
that had been built to house it.
Ibn Tumart's charge was not that the Almoravids ruled badly. It was that their
attachment to the letter of Maliki law and their suspicion of speculative
theology had led them to read the anthropomorphic language of scripture
literally, and so to describe God as having a body — which made them not lax
Muslims but unbelievers, against whom war was lawful. Dynasties end by
conquest, by fragmentation, by revolt and by the failure of a line. This one
ended because somebody won a disputation about the divine attributes and then
raised the mountains on the strength of it.
The last two
After Tashfin's death at Oran his son Ibrahim was proclaimed at Marrakesh. Ibn
Khaldun disposes of him in a sentence: the weakness and incapacity of this
prince brought about his deposition. In his place they put his uncle Ishaq,
son of Ali and grandson of Yusuf ibn Tashfin — a boy, raised to a throne with
an Almohad army finishing the last of the Maghreb outside.
When the army arrived, Ishaq came out to present himself before Abd al-Mu'min
with his household and his favourites around him. The Almohads killed all of
them in front of the conqueror.
Abd al-Mu'min crossed into Spain, and death closed on the Lamtuna from every
side, and their commanders went down with them. It is the end of a family and
of the tribal confederation that had carried it, in a city the family had
founded seventy years earlier on empty ground because it had nowhere else to
be.
The one that got away
A band of fugitives got out to the eastern islands — Mallorca, Menorca and
Ibiza. They did not stay there quietly. Ibn Khaldun, writing two centuries
later, still counts what they built afterwards in Ifriqiya as the Almoravid
monarchy, which means the dynasty outlived its own destruction by eighty
years.
The empire founded at Gabès
Drafted from Khaldun, Histoire des Berbères et des dynasties musulmanes de l'Afrique septentrionale (1852)afterlife
Ibn Khaldun gives the Almoravid remnant its own heading, and the heading is the
argument: History of the empire founded at Gabès and Tripoli by Ibn Ghaniya,
last representative of the Almoravid monarchy. A dynasty that lost its capital
in 1147 is still being written up as a going concern in Ifriqiya two
generations later.
Named after a woman
The family begins with a quarrel. Ali ibn Yusuf al-Massufi was one of the
bravest and most influential chiefs of his tribe and stood high at the court of
Yusuf ibn Tashfin, until he killed a Lamtuna chief in a dispute and had to run
for the desert, leaving a war between the Massufa and the Lamtuna behind him.
Some years later Yusuf paid the blood price out of his own treasury, which
freed the man to come home, and then married him to a kinswoman of his own
called Ghaniya, discharging a promise he had made to her father.
Their sons were brought up in the palace. Ali ibn Yusuf, the next ruler, gave
one of them western al-Andalus at Cordoba and the other the Balearic islands.
Shortly after that the empire fell down. The Banu Ghaniya still had the
islands, and were known then and afterwards by the name of the woman the
marriage had been made with rather than by the name of any of the men.
Thirty-two ships
Three of them ruled Mallorca in turn, and Ibn Khaldun records without deciding
between them two accounts of how the third got it: that his brother died, or
that he had his father and his brother both assassinated. When he died in the
1180s he left eight sons, and the eldest at once submitted to the Almohad
caliph. His brothers thought otherwise. When the caliph's agent arrived at
Mallorca to test how sincere the submission was, they deposed their eldest
brother, installed the next one, stopped the agent leaving, and — on hearing that the Almohad caliph had been
killed in battle and his son Ya'qub had succeeded him — threw him into the
bottom of a prison.
Then Ali ibn Ishaq fitted out thirty-two ships, took three of his brothers, and
sailed for Africa. They walked into Bougie in May 1185 without a fight, because
nobody there had imagined they were coming. The Almohad prince commanding the
city was away on an excursion. They arrested another Almohad prince who
happened to be passing through on his way from Ifriqiya, and emptied the houses
of the governing family.
What followed was twenty years of the most destructive campaigning in the
Maghreb: Algiers, Miliana, the Qal'a of the Banu Hammad stormed in three days,
Constantine besieged, and the whole thing financed by distributing the plunder
to whatever Arab tribes would ride with them, who arrived, Ibn Khaldun says,
with their tents, their flocks and their families. He is not neutral about
them. He was a Hafsid official and the Hafsids inherited the wreckage.
What it means to end
The Almohads eventually put them down. But the dynasty that had been finished
at Marrakesh in 1147 went on taking cities until the 1230s, from a base of
three islands, under a name inherited through a marriage arranged to settle a
homicide — and it was still being fought when the empire that destroyed it had
itself begun to come apart.
An ending is a date somebody chose. It is worth asking, each time, what it is
the date of.
Al-Mu'tamid invited the Almoravids across the strait against Castile; they won at Sagrajas, went home, returned, and deposed him on a legal opinion that rulers paying tribute to Christians had forfeited authority.
The Almoravids took Sijilmasa from the Zanata clients who had held it since the Midrarids were removed, giving a Saharan movement the northern terminus of the gold road before it had a country.
Ibn Tumart's movement declared the Almoravids unbelievers on doctrinal grounds and took Marrakesh, replacing an enforcement of Maliki law with a caliphate founded on a claim to be the mahdi.
Derived from cited spans, not from a separate source. Where both spans are ranges and they meet only on the widest reading of each, the pair is listed as possible rather than resolved to one answer. Unlinked entries are here for scale and are not written up.
Extent
An illustration, not a measurement
Snapshot year
1100
This is the nearest available snapshot to the cited peak of 1100. It is not the peak.
Cited extent
No cited figure
No source in this set gives an extent for this polity. The shape on the left is still only an illustration.
Almoravid Empire, as the snapshot draws it
Everything else on the same snapshot
Edges are blurred from the dataset’s own border-precision field. Every feature in this period is marked 1, approximate, so every border here dissolves.
The dataset author’s caveat, which belongs here rather than in the footnotes: territorial boundary as a concept is meaningful in Europe only after Westphalia, ancient polities overlap, and old vector borders drawn on modern coastlines mislead because rivers and shorelines move. Boundaries from historical-basemaps, CC-BY-4.0.
Rating
Four axes, all computed from cited numbers and never from editorial judgement. Percentiles are against every polity written up here — 280 of them — plus 50 more included for scale. Absolute figures. A missing axis is excluded from the total rather than counted as zero.
Reach
No cited figure
Longevity
107 years
27th percentile
Demographic weight
No cited figure
Influence
Three separate counts. This site never publishes a single influence number of its own; the sliders on the rankings view fuse them only in your view.
Descendant scripts
No cited figure
Religions carried
1
Sunni Islam
Successor claims
No cited figure
Weighted total
54th percentile
computed from 2 of 4 axes, renormalised across the axes that have figures. A polity with two documented axes is not penalised against one with four.