Where the weight sits

Sources

437 works carrying 6,694 citations. The build already refuses to ship a citation that does not resolve, so this page is not about whether the sourcing exists. It is about how it is distributed, which is the more useful question once a corpus is large.

A polity whose every claim rests on one book is not better sourced than a polity with a visible gap. It is one disagreement away from being wrong throughout, and nothing on its own page shows that. This page shows it.

Works cited
437
Citations
6,694
Single-source polities
18
Listed but uncited
2

Single-source polities

Every citation on these pages resolves to one work. That is not a fault — for several of them one monograph is genuinely most of the modern scholarship — but it is a fact a reader should have before relying on the page.

Every work, by how much rests on it

Listed but uncited

These are in sources.yaml and no source: field resolves to them. That is worth showing rather than hiding: an unused entry is either a work someone meant to draft from and did not, or a leftover, and both are easier to fix when visible.

  • Movses Dasxuranci, The History of the Caucasian Albanians (Oxford University Press, 1961)dasxuranci-dowsett
  • Kartlis Tskhovreba: A History of Georgia (Artanuji, 2014)kartlis-tskhovreba

Datasets

Consumed by the map layer through basemap-links.yaml rather than by a source: field, so they carry no citation count. They are never a source for a measure — hard rule 5.

  • Andre Ourednik and contributors, historical-basemaps: Historical country boundary GeoJSONCC-BY-4.0