The maritime beylik: a Turkmen principality on the Aegean that took to ships, raided as far as Greece, and was for twenty years a naval power the Byzantine emperor allied with and the pope preached a crusade against.
conquest1426Finkel, Osman's Dream: The Story of the Ottoman Empire 1300-1923 (2005)
How it was governed
3 of 4 coded
Army raised byHow the fighting force was recruited, not how it fought.
tribal levy andclient levy
tribal levy — Contingents raised through kin or tribal structures the ruler did not create
client levy — Contingents owed by subordinate chiefs or vassals under obligation
(eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)
Revenue fromWhat the state lived on. The values are unranked: the field cannot express which mattered most.
plunder andtrade toll
plunder — Campaign proceeds treated as structural income
trade toll — Customs, straits dues and caravan levies
(eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)
Succession byThe rule in force, not the outcome. A rule repeatedly violated is still the rule.
No cited figure
Right to rule fromThe ground publicly asserted — on coins, in the khutba, in titles.
conquest
The right of the sword, asserted as such
(eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)
Each line is drawn from a source that addresses the question directly. A line reads No cited figure where no source consulted does — never because the answer seemed obvious.
Turning points
1 hinge
1344The Latins take the harbour at Smyrnasiege
A papal league of Venice, Cyprus and the Hospitallers took the port castle and held it, which ended the raiding the beylik lived on. Umur died attempting to retake it in 1348, and a maritime power that had been the terror of the Aegean for a decade became a coastal principality waiting to be annexed.
(eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)
Chapters
8 in order
The beylik that took to ships
Drafted from (eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)formation
A dozen Turkmen principalities replaced the Sultanate of Rum. One of them went
to sea.
When Byzantine authority in western Anatolia dissolved after 1261 — the restored
empire at Constantinople had its attention and its money on Europe, and the
Anatolian frontier troops it had disbanded went over to the other side — the
Aegean coast fell to Turkmen bands under their own leaders.
The Aydinids took the Cayster valley,
Birgi and then Ayasoluk, which is Ephesus, and in 1329 the harbour and lower
town of Smyrna.
At which point they inherited a fleet, some Greek crews, and a coastline facing
several hundred islands.
That is the whole of the formation and it took about forty years. What makes
this beylik different from the other eleven is what it did with a harbour: every
other Turkmen principality in Anatolia was a land power that happened to reach
the sea, and this one turned into a naval state, using the ships, the sailors
and the anchorages of the people it had taken the coast from.
The stone that fell from heaven
Drafted from Battuta, The Travels of Ibn Batuta (1829)expansion
In about 1333 Ibn Battuta arrived at Birgi, in the hills above the Cayster, and
was presented to Mehmed ibn Aydın. What happened next is the best surviving
scene of an Anatolian beylik court doing anything at all.
The king asked him whether he had ever seen a stone that came down from heaven.
Ibn Battuta said he had not. The king said one had fallen in the country around
the city, and sent men to bring it.
It was a black, solid, exceedingly hard, and shining substance. If weighed it
would probably exceed a talent.
Then he called for stone-cutters. Four came in, and he told them to strike it,
and they hit it four times together with an iron hammer and made no impression
on it whatever. Ibn Battuta says he was much astonished. The king had the stone
taken back where it came from.
What a beylik was like from inside
The rest of the visit is the ordinary business of a court that wanted educated
visitors and could pay for them. The emir sent fruit and food for as long as the
party stayed. On leaving, Ibn Battuta was given a thousand dirhams, a hundred
mithqals of gold, clothing, two horses and a slave; his companions were given
money and clothes of their own.
That is a considerable outlay for a few days' hospitality by a Turkmen dynasty
two generations off the plateau, and it is the point. These were not warbands
camped in somebody else's country. They were governments with revenue, and they
spent it on the same things governments in Cairo and Damascus spent it on:
scholars, buildings, and the reputation for generosity that brought more of
both.
The map in one paragraph
Ibn Battuta then walked on, and his itinerary is the political geography of
western Anatolia in a single sentence each.
Tire, also the prince's. Ayasoluk, whose emir is Mehmed's son. Smyrna, which
belongs to the sultan of Birgi, and whose emir is Umur Beg, one of the sultan's
sons — a most excellent prince. Magnesia under Saruhan. Bergama under
Bakhshi Khan. Balıkesir under Damur Khan.
And then Bursa, governed by Orhan Beg son of Osman, of whom he says something he
says of nobody else on the coast: that he is the greatest, the richest, the most
extensive in rule and commanding the largest army of all the Turkmen kings, and
that his practice is never to stay a month in one place but to go continually
round his fortresses and districts asking how things stand.
A traveller crossing western Anatolia in 1333 met eight Turkish princes, was
handsomely entertained by several, admired the young governor of Smyrna, and
identified the one who was going to win.
A most excellent prince
Drafted from (eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)peak
Umur Bey, who ruled from 1334, used it. Aydinid squadrons raided the Aegean
islands, the Greek mainland, Thrace and the Black Sea approaches, and for about
a decade were the strongest naval force in those waters. This is a Turkmen
warband from the interior of Anatolia, two generations off the plateau, running
a maritime raiding empire — with the ships, the sailors and the anchorages of
the people it had taken the coast from, and largely with their crews.
Umur is also the beylik's best evidence for what fourteenth-century Anatolia
actually looked like. He was a close ally and personal friend of John VI
Kantakouzenos, the Byzantine claimant, and brought fleets and armies into the
Byzantine civil war on his side in the 1340s — a Muslim Turkish emir
campaigning in Thrace for one Christian Roman emperor against another. The
Greek chronicler who records it, Kantakouzenos himself, writes about him warmly.
Meanwhile the pope was preaching a crusade against him.
A mosque out of Ephesus
Drafted from (eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)aside
The Aydinid capital was Ayasoluk, which is the hill above Ephesus. In 1375 Isa
Bey had a congregational mosque built there, and it is still standing.
It is a good building — a wide prayer hall under two domes, a courtyard, a
marble portal with interlace carving — and what makes it worth a chapter is
what it is made of. The columns inside came out of the ruins below: Roman and
early Byzantine shafts and capitals, carried up from Ephesus and the ruined
basilica of Saint John, set into a mosque under a Turkish emir a thousand years
after they were cut.
Reuse of that kind was ordinary and it is badly served by the two explanations
usually offered for it. It was not simply iconoclasm and it was not simply
economy. Taking the columns of an older and grander building and standing them
up inside your own was a recognised way of appropriating what they had meant, and
rulers on every side of the period's religious lines did it — Christian churches
were built out of temples, mosques out of churches, and churches out of
mosques, for centuries, by people who would have found the modern argument about
it incomprehensible.
Ayasoluk is the easier case and therefore the useful one. Nobody was
dismantling a functioning Christian church here: Ephesus had been declining for
seven hundred years, the harbour had silted, the great basilica was already a
ruin, and the columns were lying in it. What a builder in 1375 saw was good
marble, cut, on site, in a place with no quarry. The mosque takes its
proportions from the classical material it is built out of, because the
material determined them.
The beylik that built it had lived by raiding and had lost its harbour thirty
years earlier. This is what it did with the decades afterwards: it built, in a
decayed Roman city, out of the decayed Roman city, the best surviving Aydinid
object and one of the better fourteenth-century buildings in Anatolia.
Which is a fair image of the Turkish settlement of western Anatolia altogether.
Not a clearance and not a continuation, but a new building standing on old
columns, taking its proportions from them because the columns were what there
was.
What happens when the harbour is taken
Drafted from (eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)contraction
In October 1344 a naval league assembled by the papacy — Venice, Cyprus, the
Knights Hospitaller — attacked Smyrna and took the harbour castle. They held
it, on and off, for the next fifty-eight years.
That single fortification ended the beylik as a power. The Aydinid state was
built on raiding, and raiding required a defensible harbour to sail from and
return to; without Smyrna the fleets could not operate at scale, and the
revenue that had paid the crews stopped. Umur Bey died in 1348 assaulting the
walls to get it back.
What a single fort was worth
It is worth dwelling on the scale, because it is small and the effect was total.
The crusaders took one castle, at the mouth of one harbour, and held it. They
never took Birgi, or Ayasoluk, or Tire, or the Cayster valley, or any of the
territory the beylik actually governed. The Aydinid state kept its towns, its
land revenue, its court and its emirs for another eighty years.
What it lost was the ability to be dangerous, and with that the ability to be
paid. A raiding fleet needs a harbour it can sail from loaded and return to
loaded, and one fortified position at the harbour mouth removes it. The crews
went elsewhere. The islands stopped paying to be left alone. Umur Bey spent the
rest of his life trying to get the castle back and was killed under its walls in
1348.
Fifty-eight years is a long time to garrison one tower on a foreign coast, and
it was the correct investment: the league that took it never had to fight the
fleet again.
An ambassador from Altologo
Drafted from Clavijo, Narrative of the Embassy to the Court of Timour at Samarcand (1859)contraction
In September 1403 a Castilian embassy bound for Timur's court beat its way up
the Anatolian coast against contrary winds, and the ambassador kept a journal.
He had no interest in the emirates he was passing. He wrote down where the ship
anchored and what he was told there, and in three entries he records what had
happened to this coast in the year since Ankara.
Off a city on the Turkish mainland called Palacia nueva — Balat, at the mouth
of the Maeander, in the neighbouring emirate — they were told that Timur had
been in that city when he conquered the Turk and seized Turkey. The conqueror of
Bayezid had wintered on the Aegean shore.
A few days later they anchored at a Hospitaller island for water, and the people
there gave them the local news. The Turks of Palacia had ravaged the island and
done much mischief; that very year a galliot had come over from Palacia and the
raiders had carried off many sheep, and the men who were working in the fields.
What that meant
For nearly sixty years the Aegean beyliks had been contained. One fortified harbour
mouth at Smyrna, held by a papal league, had been enough to end the raiding
economy the Aydinid state was built on, and Umur Bey had died under its walls
trying to take it back. Then Timur arrived, and in a single season the
arrangement that had held since 1344 was gone. The emirates Bayezid had
swallowed were handed back to their families, and the harbours were open again.
The Castilian journal shows what the coast did with that. Within a year the
galliots were out, and the islands that had stopped paying to be left alone were
losing their sheep and their farm workers again.
The embassy that went the other way
The journal's last observation on the subject comes from the return march. When
the ambassadors left Samarkand on 21 November 1404 they travelled in company
with the other envoys going west: one from the sultan of Egypt, one from the
brother of a great lord of Turkey, one from Sivas, one from the city of Altologo
and one from the city called Palatia.
Altologo is what Italian merchants called Ayasoluk, the Aydinid capital below
the ruins of Ephesus. Palatia is Balat again. So within two years of Ankara both
emirates had sent men the length of Asia to Samarkand and kept them there long
enough to travel home with the Castilians, in a caravan of ambassadors from
Cairo, central Anatolia and the Aegean, all of them attending on the same
elderly conqueror.
That is what a restoration cost. The beylik that had once made the papacy
assemble a fleet against it got its harbours back as a gift, and paid for them
by maintaining a permanent presence at a court on the other side of Asia. The
gift was also short. Timur was dead by the following February, and the Ottoman
state the Aydinids had been rescued from spent the next decade putting itself
back together.
Cüneyd
Drafted from (eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)end
Aydin was annexed by Bayezid I in 1390, restored by Timur after Ankara in 1402
along with every other beylik the Ottomans had swallowed, and finally annexed
for good in 1426. The thirty-six years between the first annexation and the last
are the career of one man.
Cüneyd was the last Aydinid ruler in anything but name, and he was a
professional survivor of Ottoman civil wars. He changed sides in every one he
could reach. He served whichever Ottoman prince was currently losing and
therefore needed him, extracted a principality as the price, lost it when that
prince lost, and reappeared attached to the next claimant. He held Smyrna, then
did not; held Ayasoluk, then did not; was governor of a province of the empire
he spent his life fighting, twice.
It worked for a remarkably long time and it worked for a structural reason. The
Ottoman succession was contested — after 1402 there were four brothers with
armies, and after that a rebellion led by a man claiming to be one of them — and
every contested succession is an opportunity for somebody with local troops and
no scruples about which side he is on.
Murad II ended it in 1426. Cüneyd was besieged, surrendered on terms, and was
executed with his family. The line stopped there.
What the beylik never managed
Aydin had a harbour, and lost it, and could not replace it. Karaman had
mountains, and could not be dislodged from them, and could not stay off them.
Neither could convert a strong position into a state that survived losing it,
and that is the thing worth taking from a small record. The Ottomans, who began
as the least promising of the dozen, had Rumelia — territory on the far side of
the water — which meant a defeat in Anatolia cost them a province rather than
their existence. Twice in this period an Ottoman ruler lost Anatolia
comprehensively and came back from Europe.
The beyliks each had one asset. The winner had two, in two places, with a sea
between them.
The silt
Drafted from (eds), The Seljuks of Anatolia: Court and Society in the Medieval Middle East (2013)afterlife
The Aydinid capital was Ayasoluk, the hill above Ephesus, and its harbour was
already dying when the beylik took it.
Ephesus had been one of the great ports of the Roman world. The Cayster, which
made the plain fertile, also carried silt, and over a thousand years the
coastline moved west; the classical harbour works ended up several kilometres
inland, and the city moved uphill to the citadel and the basilica of Saint John.
What the Aydinids inherited in about 1304 was a decayed Byzantine town on a hill
with a silting anchorage below it, and what they did with it was build.
Isa Bey's congregational mosque of 1375 is still standing, and the columns
inside it came out of the ruins below.
What became of the ground
Aydin's territory became Ottoman provinces and its ports became Ottoman ports,
and the naval habit went with them. The Aegean coast the beylik had raided from
supplied crews, captains and shipyards to the Ottoman fleet for the next four
centuries, and the men who beat Venice at sea in the sixteenth century were
working out of the same harbours with the same populations behind them.
Ayasoluk itself did not survive as a port. The silt kept coming, the harbour
closed entirely, and the town shrank to a village beside a ruin. It carries the
dynasty's name now: the province and its capital are called Aydın, after a
Turkmen family that held the coast for a hundred and twenty years, and the
village by the basilica is Selçuk, after the Seljuks, who never governed it.
The residue
What is left of the beylik is therefore three things, and none of them is
territory.
A mosque made out of a Roman city. A stretch of coast that carries the family's
name on the map. And one afternoon at Birgi in 1333, when a Turkmen prince
showed a Moroccan lawyer a meteorite and had four men hit it with a hammer to
prove it could not be broken.
One of the Turkmen principalities that formed in the marches the sultanate could no longer restrain, on the Aegean coast Byzantine authority had abandoned.
Annexed by Bayezid I in 1390, restored by Timur after Ankara, and finished in 1426 when its last ruler had run out of Ottoman civil wars to change sides in.
Derived from cited spans, not from a separate source. Where both spans are ranges and they meet only on the widest reading of each, the pair is listed as possible rather than resolved to one answer. Unlinked entries are here for scale and are not written up.
Extent
The historical-basemaps snapshots are world maps at fixed years, and none of the ones falling inside this polity's lifetime names it among the polities it draws.
Rating
Four axes, all computed from cited numbers and never from editorial judgement. Percentiles are against every polity written up here — 280 of them — plus 50 more included for scale. Absolute figures. A missing axis is excluded from the total rather than counted as zero.
Reach
No cited figure
Longevity
118 years
30th percentile
Demographic weight
No cited figure
Influence
Three separate counts. This site never publishes a single influence number of its own; the sliders on the rankings view fuse them only in your view.
Descendant scripts
No cited figure
Religions carried
No cited figure
Successor claims
No cited figure
Weighted total
30th percentile
computed from 1 of 4 axes, renormalised across the axes that have figures. A polity with two documented axes is not penalised against one with four.