A minor Swabian count's family, raised to the German crown by electors who wanted a weak monarch, that briefly reunited Austria, Hungary and Bohemia under Albert V, lost Vienna to Matthias Corvinus, and under Maximilian I found a French king's conquest of Rome itself could not move a German diet.
The Duchies of Austria, Styria, Carinthia (from 1335) and Tyrol (from 1363), along the middle Danube
How it was governed
1 of 4 coded
Army raised byHow the fighting force was recruited, not how it fought.
No cited figure
Revenue fromWhat the state lived on. The values are unranked: the field cannot express which mattered most.
No cited figure
Succession byThe rule in force, not the outcome. A rule repeatedly violated is still the rule.
No cited figure
Right to rule fromThe ground publicly asserted — on coins, in the khutba, in titles.
electionChosen by a body entitled to choose
investiture
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Each line is drawn from a source that addresses the question directly. A line reads No cited figure where no source consulted does — never because the answer seemed obvious.
Turning points
15 hinges
12731499
1273
Rudolf's election as King of the RomansSuccession crisis
The electors passed over both favourites for the vacant German crown - Bohemia's own king among them - and settled instead on a minor Swabian count whose modest territories made him look easy to control, a calculation about to be proven badly wrong.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1278
The Battle of MarchfeldBattle
Rudolf's army broke Ottokar's forces near the March river after Ottokar refused every offer of peace, and Ottokar himself, unhorsed and overpowered after refusing to quit the field even as his army collapsed around him, was stripped of his armour and cut down in revenge by noblemen whose own families he had once destroyed.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1282
Austria and Styria settled on Rudolf's sonsReform
At a diet in Augsburg, Rudolf formally granted the conquered duchies of Austria and Styria to his own sons Albert and Rudolph II, converting territory he had won as King of the Romans into hereditary Habsburg family property for the first time - a separate act, years after his own election, that made Austria itself the family's own possession rather than a fief he merely administered.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1298
The Battle of GöllheimBattle
Passed over for the crown once already, Albert deposed his own electors' second choice for contumacy and killed him in single combat when the two kings met in battle near Speyer - then had the electors formally re-elect him anyway, unwilling to hold a throne people might call a battlefield prize rather than a lawful succession.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1314
Two kings crowned in a fortnightSuccession crisis
Rival electors crowned Frederick the Handsome and Louis of Bavaria within days of each other, each coronation looking equally legitimate, and opened eight years of civil war that cost the family a king's freedom at Mühldorf, over fifteen hundred men in a single ambush at Morgarten, and its last real claim on the German throne for more than a century.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1330
The Peace of HagenauTreaty
Frederick's and Leopold's deaths removed the family's last rival claim on the imperial title, and the surviving brothers made peace with Louis of Bavaria at last - closing, at a stroke, a war the 1314 double election had opened sixteen years earlier and steadying the House of Austria more than either dead brother's reign ever had.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1369
Tyrol secured at SchardingTreaty
Three decades after a childless heiress's disputed marriages first drew Bavaria, Bohemia and Austria into a three-way contest for her inheritance, Emperor Charles IV mediated a settlement that closed the dispute for good: Bavaria gave up its claim outright for a cash payment, leaving Austria undisputed master of a mountain duchy rich in silver and command of the roads into Italy.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1386
The Battle of SempachBattle
Confident nobles who dismissed the confederate army as an unarmed rabble pushed Leopold III into an immediate attack rather than wait for reinforcements, and a knight's self-sacrifice broke the Austrian line open; roughly two thousand men died, Leopold himself among them, closing out seventy years in which the family's Swiss patrimony was lost the same way every time - armoured cavalry sent into terrain that neutralised it, broken by a smaller force holding the high ground.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1406
The family splits into the Albertine and Leopoldine linesReform
A cousin's sudden, childless death ended the joint guardianship that had briefly held the dynasty together, and the House of Austria broke permanently into an Albertine branch holding Austria for the child Albert V and a Leopoldine branch split three ways among Leopold III's own surviving sons - a family humbling itself through its own internal division, exactly as an earlier emperor had once wryly predicted it would.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1438
Albert elected King of the RomansSuccession crisis
With Germany still fractured by private feuds and church schism and the Ottomans pressing on Hungary's own frontier, the electors turned to the one prince already ruling three kingdoms at once; although never formally crowned, Albert became the first Habsburg to hold the German crown since Rudolf I, and the first ever to pair it with Austria, Hungary and Bohemia together.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1439
The death of Albert VCatastrophe
Struck by the same dysentery that had already forced an Ottoman army into retreat, Albert insisted on pressing toward Vienna rather than rest, and died in a village short of the city less than two years after becoming the first ruler in a century and a half to hold both the imperial crown and the House of Austria's own patrimony together - a reach no later Habsburg duke would match.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1457
The death of Ladislaus PosthumusCatastrophe
Struck down by sudden illness in Prague while preparing to marry a French princess, Ladislaus died within thirty-six hours at seventeen, ending the one reign since Albert V's own death that had briefly held Austria, Hungary and Bohemia together under a single king - and opening, in its place, decades of fraternal war, disputed regencies and Ottoman pressure that no single Habsburg duke would fully master again.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1477
Maximilian marries Mary of Burgundy by proxyTreaty
Against her own council's advice and the machinations of Louis XI of France, Mary chose Maximilian on the strength of her late father's praise for him and a token exchange of letters, joining the vast Burgundian inheritance - Flanders, Artois, Holland, Brabant and more - to the House of Austria for the first time, and opening a rivalry with the French crown that would outlast every ruler who lived through its opening decade.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1493
The death of Frederick IIICatastrophe
A leg amputation he bore without complaint gave way to a fatal dysentery, brought on by an indulgence for melons that echoed the very habit that had ended his own son's life decades before; having already handed full administration of Austria and the empire to Maximilian, Frederick closed a fifty-three-year reign longer than any emperor's since Augustus.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
1499
Peace with France settles Burgundy against PhilipTreaty
After a Swiss-mercenary force sent to press Philip's claims collapsed through mutiny and bribery, Louis XII - his own attention already fixed on conquering Milan - offered terms Philip accepted at once: the three disputed towns restored, and the whole Burgundian question handed to the Parliament of Paris for a verdict everyone involved already knew how it would fall.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Chapters
23 in order · about 68 minutes
Counts who did not attain their height by fraud
formationDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
The family that would rule Austria for more than six centuries began
as minor counts in Alsace and Switzerland, holding a castle - built,
by the family's own foundation records, by a bishop of Strasbourg
named Werner in 1027 - on a hill above the village of Windisch that
gave the line its name: Habsburg. Werner's descendants added to their
modest inheritance through marriage, imperial grants, and appointment
as advocates over neighbouring abbeys and towns, an office that
carried real revenue and authority and, over generations, tended to
become both permanent and hereditary. Rudolf, born in 1218 and
presented at the baptismal font by the Emperor Frederick II himself,
grew up at Frederick's own court and camp, trained from boyhood in
wrestling, horsemanship and the javelin, and inherited on his father's
death in 1240 only a modest landgraviate, a burgraviate, and a share
of the family's original county - territories confined enough that, in
Coxe's own telling, Rudolf spent much of his youth doing what German
princes of his rank did: fighting his neighbours.
Habsburg Castle in the Aargau, the seat that gave the family its name.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Schuetze75 · CC BY-SA 4.0
A count who kept his word
His early wars were unglamorous and local - a fortress stormed from a
resentful young baron in 1242, a feud with his own guardian uncle over
an inheritance, an extortionate dispute with another uncle's family
over the county of Kyburg - the ordinary business of a minor lord
building his position through opportunism and force. What set him
apart, in the source's telling, was less restraint than reliability:
when a delegation of would-be assassins offered to kill his rival
Ottokar of Bohemia for him decades later, Rudolf refused and warned
Ottokar instead, a decision consistent with the values his own father
had left him at the family's ancestral convent of Muri before departing
on crusade - to act with intrepidity once committed to a cause, but
never to seek advantage through fraud or treachery. It was this
reputation, combined with the modesty of his actual territory, that
would make him acceptable to the very electors most anxious not to
crown a master.
An emperor, but not a master
formationDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
The imperial throne had sat vacant through decades of interregnum by
1273, and when the seven electors met at Frankfurt that September, the
two candidates most expected to succeed were King Ottokar of Bohemia
and King Alfonso of Castile. Instead the nomination fell, against
every expectation, on Rudolf, Count of Habsburg - a choice engineered
above all by Werner of Eppenstein, the Archbishop-Elector of Mainz,
who had once been personally escorted across the Alps by Rudolf on a
dangerous road and had long wished to repay the favour. Werner secured
two more clerical votes quietly and won over the secular electors
through a simpler mechanism: Rudolf had six unmarried daughters, and
the promise of a royal marriage alliance proved persuasive to more
than one prince weighing his own succession. Bohemia's ambassadors
protested, but the election was declared unanimous, and Rudolf was
crowned at Aachen with Charlemagne's own ancient crown.
Why the electors chose him
The reasoning behind the choice, as Coxe lays it out, was almost
entirely calculating rather than complimentary: Rudolf's civil and
military talents suited him to govern, but the modest scale of his own
territories meant he lacked the means to claim back the fiefs the
electors had quietly appropriated for themselves during the long
vacancy, or to rule with the heavy hand the great imperial houses of
Franconia and Swabia once had. The electors, in the source's own
phrase, "desired an emperor, but dreaded a master." Rudolf, fifty-five
years old and untested on this scale, proved them only half right: the
change of station neither altered his character nor corrupted it, but
it opened, at last, a field large enough for the abilities that thirty
years of provincial feuding had never fully tested. His first and most
urgent task was securing the new Pope's recognition against the rival
claims of both Ottokar and the deposed anti-king Alfonso - a
diplomatic contest that would, within two years, turn into an open
war with Bohemia itself.
Rudolf's tomb effigy in the crypt of Speyer Cathedral.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · José Luiz · CC BY-SA 4.0
The most powerful prince in Europe
expansionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Ottokar of Bohemia had spent decades assembling, through inheritance,
war, purchase and a canny sequence of dynastic marriages, the largest
territory of any prince in Europe - Bohemia and Moravia by hereditary
right, Austria and Styria seized from a tangle of rival claimants after
the old Babenberg ducal line died out, and Carinthia and Carniola
bought outright from a dying, childless duke over his own brother's
prior claim. His dominions by the 1270s ran from the borders of
Bavaria to Raab in Hungary, and from the Adriatic to the Baltic. Beside
this, Rudolf's own hereditary lands - scattered fragments of Alsace,
Swabia and the Alpine foothills - looked almost trivial, and Rudolf
sat on what Coxe calls "a tottering throne," raised to the imperial
dignity by princes who meant him to be their chief in name more than
in power. When Rudolf's diet declared Ottokar guilty of contumacy for
refusing to surrender the disputed duchies and do homage for the rest,
open war followed.
The battle on the Marchfeld in the *Ehrenspiegel* of the House of Austria, drawn by Jörg Breu the Younger in 1555.
Bavarian State Library, Munich · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Jörg Breu the Younger · Public domain
A kneeling king, and a legend refuted
Rudolf's campaign succeeded faster than anyone expected - the city of
Vienna itself opened its gates to him - and by November 1276 Ottokar
was forced to terms: he renounced every claim to Austria, Styria,
Carinthia and Carniola, and on 25 November crossed the Danube to
Rudolf's camp to kneel and do homage for what remained to him,
receiving in return the investiture of Bohemia and Moravia alone. A
popular story, repeated by many historians, held that Rudolf agreed to
let Ottokar perform this humiliating ceremony privately inside his own
tent, then had the tent's sides thrown open at the crucial moment to
expose the kneeling king to both watching armies - the calculated
public insult that supposedly drove Ottokar to break the peace soon
after. Coxe, citing a scholar who wrote a treatise specifically to
refute it, calls the story "idle and improbable" and rejects it
outright; whatever actually turned Ottokar back to war, it was not
stage-managed humiliation. Rudolf, having secured the disputed duchies
as fiefs reverted to the empire, moved his own family's household to
Vienna and set about winning the loyalty of the Austrian nobility by
confirming their privileges and letting them rebuild the fortresses
Ottokar had torn down.
The battle by the March
The peace held for less than two years. Ottokar broke camp and
advanced with a large army in August 1278, and at dawn on the 26th
Rudolf's own forces crossed the stream near Weidendorf and attacked in
a crescent formation against both of Ottokar's flanks at once. The
fighting was desperate on both sides - at one point Rudolf himself was
unhorsed and nearly killed, saved only by the timely charge of his own
reserve commander - but the imperial army eventually broke Ottokar's
lines and drove the fleeing Bohemians into the river, where more than
fourteen thousand were killed, drowned or captured. Ottokar refused to
leave the field even after his army's total collapse, fighting alone
until he was overpowered, unhorsed and killed on the spot by Austrian
and Styrian nobles avenging relatives he had put to death. Rudolf,
who had tried and failed to send help in time to spare his rival's
life, praised Ottokar's courage afterward in his own letter to the
Pope - "that magnanimous monarch lost his life at the same time with
the victory" - and took possession of Moravia without a fight,
though he left the Bohemian throne itself to Ottokar's eight-year-old
son under a regency, having gotten what he actually wanted: undisputed
mastery of Austria and Styria.
*Wenceslas Asks Rudolf for his Father's Body*, painted by Anton Petter in 1826.
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Anton Petter · Public domain
The century of contested elections
expansionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Rudolf died in 1291 still trying to get the electors to break their
own habit and confirm his son Albert while he lived; they refused, on
the reasoning that the empire could not maintain two kings at once,
and let the question lapse until he was gone. It was a lesson the
family would keep learning for the next hundred years: the same
calculation that had put a minor Swabian count on the throne kept
reproducing itself every time a Habsburg looked strong enough to make
the crown hereditary. Albert, confident enough of his own claim to
seize the imperial regalia before a single vote had been cast, watched
the Archbishop of Mainz maneuver the college toward a weaker cousin,
Adolf of Nassau, instead - the electors "desired an emperor, but
dreaded a master," and Albert's own arrogance had done nothing to
change their minds.
Yield your life and your crown
Adolf's reign gave Albert his opening. Arbitrary and grasping enough
to alienate the very archbishop who had made him king, Adolf was
deposed for contumacy by a diet Albert had spent a year quietly
assembling, and the two rival kings met in battle at Göllheim on 2
July 1298. Albert had armed picked infantry with poniards made
specifically to strike at horses, and when Adolf cut his way through
the melee toward him shouting "Yield your life and your crown! The
event is in the hand of Providence!" Albert drove a lance into his
face and had him cut down where he fell. Wary of holding a throne
people might call a battlefield prize, Albert had the electors
formally renounce his own earlier deposition of Adolf and re-elect him
clean - a legal fiction that gave him the crown his father had wanted
for him, at the cost of a rival's life rather than a peaceful
succession.
Albert's own ambitions reached further than his father's had: a brief,
disastrous bid to put his eldest son Rudolph on Bohemia's throne ended
in Rudolph's death within a year, and a second attempt to install
another son was shouted down in the Prague assembly itself - "We will
have no Austrian king!" - the crowd killing three Austrian partisans
rather than accept the nomination. Passed over for Bohemia twice,
Albert was still planning a larger campaign to force the issue when an
entirely different grievance ended his reign for good. His own
nephew John, denied the share of the family's Swiss and Alsatian
lands he believed was owed him, had been humiliated once too often -
offered a garland of flowers instead of his inheritance, with the
remark that it suited his years better than the cares of government.
Days later, crossing the river opposite the family's own ancestral
castle, John and four confederates ambushed Albert with a single
attendant at his side, cut him down within sight of the walls his
family took its name from, and left him to bleed out in a peasant
woman's arms before his own son could reach him.
The murder of Albert I, in an Austrian chronicle illustrated about 1480.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Unknown artist · Public domain
Two crowns in a fortnight
Passed over yet again for the German throne after Albert's murder -
the electors, still wary of the family, chose Henry of Luxembourg
instead, who moved fast enough to install his own son John on
Bohemia's throne within four years - the Habsburgs spent the next
decade watching a Luxembourg foothold harden next door into exactly
the rival dynasty their own repeated exclusions from Bohemia had been
meant to prevent. When Henry died in 1313, the empire's tangled
electoral system produced the deadlock it seemed built to invite: on 9
October 1314 the Austrian electors chose Frederick the Handsome at
Sachsenhausen, and within days the Luxembourg party crowned Louis of
Bavaria at Frankfurt instead. Two kings, each with a legitimate-
looking coronation, prepared for war.
Looking for a quicker way to weaken the Bavarian coalition, Frederick's
brother Leopold marched against three Swiss cantons that had sided
with Louis, boasting he would trample the "audacious rustics"
underfoot. Fourteen hundred Swiss met his fifteen-thousand-strong
column in the narrow pass of Morgarten on 16 November 1315, rolling
logs and boulders down onto cavalry too cramped to maneuver before
charging into infantry too tightly packed to defend itself. More than
fifteen hundred Austrians died, most of them titled nobility, and
Leopold escaped only with a peasant's help - a defeat that cost the
family more than the war it was meant to help win, and the first of
several the Swiss mountains would deal the House of Austria over the
following seventy years.
Morgarten, in the chronicle of Diebold Schilling the Elder.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Diebold Schilling the Elder · Public domain
A brother's late arrival
The wider war ground on for seven more years before Frederick, waiting
at Mühldorf in 1322 for Leopold's own army to arrive, abandoned a
sound defensive position to give battle alone - and lost, when a
disguised flanking force broke his exhausted line in the day's final
hour and took him prisoner. Louis, unexpectedly gracious in victory,
confined rather than executed his rival, and when Leopold's continued
resistance and the Pope's own hostility wore Louis down, Frederick did
something almost without precedent in the family's history: bound by a
parole he alone had sworn, he returned to captivity of his own accord
once his brothers refused to honor the terms he had agreed to on their
behalf. Louis, moved by "this rare instance of probity," treated his
returned prisoner as a guest rather than an enemy - the two men, by
one contemporary account, ate at the same table and slept in the same
bed - and eventually offered him joint rule of the empire outright, an
arrangement without precedent that the electors and the Pope both
rejected the moment it became public.
The partnership never had the chance to prove itself. Leopold, who had
never forgiven himself for arriving too late at Mühldorf, died at
Strasbourg in 1326; their brother Henry, broken by six months as a
prisoner of his own, followed within the year; and Frederick, stripped
of the joint authority he had briefly held, died in 1330 - a king
twice crowned, one battle short of the throne he had spent his adult
life reaching for. It was, paradoxically, his death and Leopold's that
finally steadied the family: with no more Habsburg pretender left to
contest the crown, the surviving brothers Albert and Otho made peace
with Louis at Hagenau that same year, ending sixteen years of a war
that had cost the dynasty a king's freedom, three princes' lives, and
its last real claim on the German throne for more than a century.
A duchess who outlived two husbands' claims
expansionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Carinthia's own duke died in 1335 without a son, leaving his
territories to an only daughter, Margaret, nicknamed Maultasch for the
size of her mouth - and touching off a dispute over Carinthia and
Tyrol together that would run, on and off, for three decades and two
generations of Habsburg dukes. John of Bohemia had already secured
Margaret's hand for his own eight-year-old son, expecting both
duchies to pass to his family along with her; Emperor Louis of
Bavaria, newly reconciled with his old Austrian rivals, simply revoked
the decree allowing female inheritance and granted Carinthia to Albert
and Otho of Austria instead. Austria took it without much resistance.
Tyrol's own nobles refused the transfer outright, and John, furious at
losing what he had already paid for, ravaged Austrian territory until
a negotiated peace left Carinthia in Habsburg hands for good and Tyrol
with Margaret - the family's second permanent territorial gain, and
proof, a generation after Rudolf's own conquest of Austria and Styria,
that the dynasty could hold what it won.
Margaret of Tyrol in a later commemorative portrait.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Wilfredor · CC0
A marriage dissolved by decree
Margaret's own marriage curdled into open hatred within a few years;
she had her husband imprisoned, escaped her own confinement, and threw
herself on Louis's protection instead. Louis, eager for Tyrol on his
family's behalf now, accepted her, betrothed her to his own son, and -
over the Pope's furious objections - dissolved her first marriage by
imperial decree. King John, blind, aging, and never reconciled to the
insult, spent his last years building the coalition that would put his
own eldest son on the imperial throne, and died fighting for the
French crown at Crécy without ever recovering the province he
considered stolen from his family.
Two decades later, the province came to Austria not by war but by a
death that Rudolf IV moved fast to exploit. Margaret's second marriage
had never won papal approval, leaving her son Meinhard's own
legitimacy in doubt; Rudolf secured the pope's recognition for the boy,
married him to his own sister, and in return won Margaret's promise
that Austria would inherit Tyrol outright should her husband and son
both die without heirs. They did, within two years of each other, and
Rudolf crossed the Alps in the depths of winter to secure her
agreement in person before anyone could reconsider - pressing for
immediate possession, well aware how changeable her temper could be,
and dazzling her with enough of his own court's splendor at Vienna
that she agreed to leave her mountain duchy behind for good.
Confirmed twice over
Securing the emperor's own approval proved harder than securing
Margaret's, since Rudolf and his brothers were, at that very moment,
allied against Charles IV in his capacity as King of Bohemia - old
rivalry outliving the marriage tie meant to end it. It was Rudolf's
own wife, Charles's daughter, who arranged the peace: a meeting at
Brünn in 1364 where Charles confirmed Margaret's grant and formally
invested Rudolf with a province no Habsburg duke had ruled before. The
house of Lower Bavaria, cut out of an inheritance it had once
expected, contested the transfer by force until the Pope - more
interested in German troops for his own Italian war than in one
Alpine province - brokered a truce that left Tyrol in Habsburg hands.
Bavaria renewed the claim once more after Margaret's own death in
1366, seizing several towns before three years of negotiation produced
a final settlement at Scharding in 1369: Bavaria renounced Tyrol for
good in exchange for a cash payment, and Austria kept undisputed
mastery of a duchy rich in silver mines and command of the roads into
Italy - a childless heiress's inheritance, fought over by two rival
dynasties across two Habsburg generations, settled at last by a treaty
neither original claimant lived to see.
Hoc est verum
asideDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Rudolf IV, who won Tyrol for his family by moving faster than anyone
else expected, spent much of the rest of his short reign on an
ambition no treaty could satisfy: making his own family look, on
parchment and in seal-wax, as ancient and exalted as it had just
become in fact. He combed the "musty records" of Austria's earlier
dukes and revived every privilege and title any predecessor had ever
held or merely claimed, commissioning seals stamped with invented
hieroglyphs and occult characters - one showed a man's head with five
faces - and an alphabet mixing Greek, Runic, Roman and Arabic letters
for the mottoes cut into them. He rarely signed his own letters with
his name, closing them instead with his age, his regnal year, and the
phrase Hoc est verum - this is true.
Rudolf IV, painted about 1360–65, one of the earliest surviving portraits of a European ruler.
Dom Museum, Vienna · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Unknown artist · Public domain
A title too far
What actually provoked the emperor was wounded pride rather than any
of the antiquarian invention itself. Charles IV's own recent Golden
Bull had ranked the seven electors above every other prince in the
empire, and Rudolf, denied a vote he had no real claim to, answered by
assuming the title Archduke Palatine, citing an old grant supposedly
made by Frederick I to the earlier Babenberg dukes of Austria - a
document no source outside Rudolf's own chancery had ever seen.
Charles at first dismissed the whole affair as antiquarian
eccentricity, but Rudolf's growing ostentation eventually forced his
hand: he summoned his own son-in-law before the diet repeatedly and
ordered him to drop the invented arms and return to those his father
had actually borne. Rudolf gave up the fanciful seals and the
"Palatine" in public use, but never fully let go of "Archduke" itself.
The title outlived the rebuke that tried to kill it. Confirmed for the
House of Austria in earnest by a later emperor, Frederick III, decades
after Rudolf's own death, it became the family's own standing style -
a fabrication invented to answer one Golden Bull's insult that ended
up outlasting the document that provoked it.
What else the same reign left behind
Rudolf's shorter-lived successes were more conventional. A dispute
with the Patriarch of Aquileia over contested fiefs in Styria,
Carinthia and Carniola ended in an imperial ban against the patriarch,
several fortresses taken by force, and a peace that installed an
Austrian judge and garrison in Friuli. And in Vienna he founded a
university meant to rival Prague's own - which within a few years
became the second such institution in Germany, and outlasted every
invented seal and disputed title from the same reign as the one
genuine monument Rudolf left behind. He died of a fever in Italy in
1365, twenty-six years old and without an heir, having spent a brief
reign trying to manufacture on parchment the standing his own conquest
of Tyrol had already won him in fact.
The name of a Swiss
expansionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Every Habsburg loss to the Swiss cantons over the following seventy
years ran on the same mechanism Morgarten had already shown once:
overconfident nobles, certain that a peasant militia could not stand
against armored cavalry, marched into terrain that neutralized the
cavalry entirely and met a smaller force using the high ground against
them. The pattern repeated at Näfels, it repeated in the countryside
around Sempach, and by the time it had run its course the family's
own Swiss patrimony - towns, tolls, advocacies over abbeys, and a
military reputation two centuries in the making - was gone.
Lucerne went first, worn down by border warfare and factional strife
between Austrian loyalists and everyone else; its citizens secured
imperial protection and a truce with the Swiss cantons, beat back an
Austrian attempt to retake the town by surprise, and joined the
confederacy without repudiating any of Austria's existing rights -
carefully, but joined all the same. Zurich followed through its own
revolution: a popular government under the burgomaster Rudolf Brun
crushed an attempted noble counter-coup backed by a Habsburg kinsman,
and, fearing Duke Albert's revenge, brought the city into the
confederacy itself in 1351. Albert marched sixteen thousand men
against it and won an arbitration on paper, but when he tried to
enforce the harshest terms against the smaller cantons, Schwyz
answered under the same banner that had broken his brother Leopold at
Morgarten a generation before, and Glarus went the same way soon
after - a relief force expelling its Austrian governor in the dead of
winter, then joining the confederacy it had just helped defend.
An old man's despair, a young man's truce
Albert, aging and crippled by the paralysis that had afflicted him
since his thirties, finally gave up the contest in such disgust that
his own household learned never to mention the Swiss in his presence
again. He died in 1358 having earned, for everything except this one
failure, the name "the Wise." His son Rudolf, by his father's own
measure the most gifted of all the Austrian princes so far, inherited
a war he judged unwinnable the moment he actually looked at the
ground it was being fought on - the mountain terrain gave the
confederates an advantage no cavalry charge could answer - and did
what his father never could: he negotiated a truce instead of
reaching for one more defeat, and held to it faithfully for the rest
of his short reign. It bought the family twenty years of quiet on its
Swiss frontier, and it was the last time for a generation that a
Habsburg duke chose to cut Austria's losses there rather than reopen
a fight the family had already spent decades losing, piece by piece,
to a people its own dukes had once dismissed as rustics.
Albert II in a stained-glass window at St Florian, from a nineteenth-century colour plate by Karl Lind.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Karl Lind · Public domain
This very noon
expansionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Leopold III, who took Styria, Carinthia, Tyrol and the family's
Swabian and Alsatian holdings in a division that broke the
indivisibility every earlier Habsburg generation had preserved, spent
the 1370s and early 1380s absorbing territory faster than any duke
before him - and spent it just as fast on two humiliations that left
him desperate enough, by 1386, to gamble everything on a single
battle. An invading army of unemployed mercenaries under his own
cousin, the famous soldier Enguerrand de Coucy, was broken not by
Leopold's own diplomacy but by Swiss peasants fighting on their own
account - the very cantons he considered his family's oldest enemies
rescuing him almost by accident. And a marriage arranged to bring his
son William the Polish crown collapsed when the Polish nobles,
dazzled by a rival suitor's promise to convert an entire pagan
duchy to Christianity, overruled their own queen's declared wish to
marry no one but the Austrian match and shut William out of Kraków
for good. The loss struck Leopold harder than any battlefield reverse
he sank into a depression that let his own bailiffs' extortions run
unchecked, and the resulting unrest drew his oldest enemies, the
Swabian towns and the Swiss cantons together, into exactly the
alliance his own governance should have prevented.
A mock breakfast invitation
War broke out in earnest once Austrian troops retook and burned the
town of Richensee, killing every inhabitant regardless of age or sex.
Leopold massed his army at Baden and sent a diversionary force toward
Zurich to mask his real target, Lucerne, but the Forest Cantons saw
through the feint and marched to Sempach instead. Leopold reached the
town at dawn on 9 July 1386 with four thousand horse and fourteen
hundred foot, confident enough of an easy victory that his own troops
rode up to the walls to taunt the defenders with a mock breakfast
invitation for the "reapers" in the fields outside. The burgomaster
answered simply: "My masters of Lucern, and their allies, will bring
it."
Surprised to find the confederates already drawn up in the woods
above the lake, Leopold called a council to weigh waiting for
reinforcements - and was shouted down by his own nobles, who declared
it shameful to delay against what they dismissed as an "ill-armed and
almost naked rabble." One veteran urging caution was mocked as a
coward by a younger knight who bragged the peasants would be
delivered up "this very noon." The knights dismounted in ground too
rough for cavalry, formed a dense phalanx bristling with spears, and
advanced; the Swiss knelt first in prayer, prompting some Austrians to
mistake the gesture for a plea for mercy, before the confederates
surged down out of the trees in a wedge that broke against the
Austrian line without effect - sixty of the attackers' best fighters
dead before a single Austrian fell.
Winkelried
At that moment a knight of Unterwalden named Arnold von Winkelried
broke from the Swiss ranks. "I will open a passage into the line," he
is said to have called out. "Protect, dear countrymen and
confederates, my wife and children!" He threw himself onto the
Austrian spears, gathered as many as he could reach in his own arms,
and bore them down with his weight as he died - and his companions
poured through the gap his body opened. Weighed down by their own
armor and unable to recover formation in the crush, the Austrian
knights broke; their own servants, seeing the battle turning, mounted
their masters' horses and fled, cutting off any hope of escape for
the men they had served. Roughly two thousand Austrians died, nearly a
third of them titled nobility, against perhaps two hundred confederate
dead.
The battle of Sempach in an anonymous watercolour of 1513.
Swiss National Museum, Zurich · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Unknown artist · Public domain
Leopold fought to the end rather than flee, seizing the family
standard himself after two bearers fell in succession and rallying
his remaining knights for one final charge before he was cut down by
an unknown hand. He was thirty-six. His body and those of
twenty-seven of his noblest followers were carried to the family's own
abbey at Königsfelden; the Swiss buried their two hundred dead with
full honors at Lucerne and established an annual memorial for the
victory to stand alongside the one already kept for Morgarten, seventy
years before.
The war that finally closed
Sempach settled nothing on its own. Fresh declarations of war arrived
within a week, and the fighting that followed went no better: Bern
joined the confederacy, and Austrian subjects around Gaster and
Sargans switched their allegiance outright. When the truce that
followed expired in 1388, Austrian troops massacred the garrison at
Weesen and pushed on to Näfels, where the same mechanism that had
broken Leopold at Morgarten broke his army a second time - boulders
rolled down onto an advancing column, followed by a charge from the
heights that drowned hundreds of fleeing soldiers when the bridge at
Weesen collapsed under their own weight. A hundred and eighty knights
and roughly two thousand common soldiers died, and eleven captured
banners went home as trophies. With the Aargau itself now threatened,
the Austrian princes gave up the war for good that year, and when the
resulting truce came up for renewal, Leopold's own son chose not to
test the confederates again: he renounced any remaining claim to
their conquests and extended the peace for twenty years. A war that
had cost the House of Austria a duke, two army-shattering defeats, and
most of its remaining Swiss possessions closed at last not with
victory for either side, but with Austria formally accepting a border
it could no longer move.
Näfels, in the Spiezer Chronik of Diebold Schilling, 1484.
Burgerbibliothek, Bern · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Diebold Schilling · Public domain
Our true father
expansionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
While his brother Leopold fought and died against the Swiss, Albert
III governed the Austrian heartland in a wholly different register:
suppressing banditti, restraining nobles who mistook his mildness for
weakness, and pouring his real energy into the university his own
brother Rudolf had founded, endowing new chairs and deepening its
rivalry with Prague. He showed almost none of his predecessors'
appetite for war - a single expedition to Prussia alongside the
Teutonic Knights stands out precisely because it was so unlike him -
and kept his main residence at Laxenburg specifically to escape the
pomp of court life, gardening with his own hands and studying
classical treatises on rural economy for pleasure.
Albert III's campaign in Prussia in 1377, in an engraving of about 1862.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Unknown artist · Public domain
Age did not change that pattern until, in 1395, Bohemia's collapsing
politics pulled him in regardless: King Wenceslas IV's erratic rule
had driven a faction of nobles to seize and imprison him, and Albert
led an army into the kingdom on their behalf, his first real campaign
in nearly two decades of peaceful rule. He fell mortally ill in camp
before the fighting resolved anything, and died at Laxenburg on 29
August 1395, forty-six years old.
"Our true father"
Vienna mourned him as it had mourned no Habsburg duke before: crowds
gathered around his body crying "We have lost our friend, our true
father!" A contemporary chronicler remembered him as "a lover of
peace, a pious and meek prince," and he earned two lasting nicknames
from his own subjects - "the Astrologer," for a genuine fascination
with judicial astrology, and "Albert with the Tress," for a lock of
hair he wore braided into his own and used to found a chivalric
society modeled on the gesture. An oddly gentle set of epitaphs for a
family whose dukes were more often remembered for the battles that
killed them.
Albert III in the sixteenth-century cycle of Tyrolean rulers at Ambras Castle.
Ambras Castle, Innsbruck · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Ermione 13 · CC BY-SA 4.0
A family that kept dividing itself
expansionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Albert IV, sixteen when his father died, spent his short reign
yielding ground rather than fighting for it - content to let his
cousin Leopold's branch of the family absorb every Habsburg territory
but Austria itself in the interest of peace, and settling a disputed
succession with his own cousin William on joint rule for life rather
than contest it. What his own reign is chiefly remembered for is a
pilgrimage: he traveled to Jerusalem and came home with the epithet
"the Wonder of the World," even though Coxe notes dryly that the
actual business of his rule offered "few remarkable events in the
sober pages of history." One campaign did reach him regardless - an
alliance with King Sigismund of Hungary against a Moravian warlord
ended in a surrender feast that turned out to be a poisoning; Albert
died of it at Klosterneuburg in 1404, twenty-seven years old, leaving
the Austrian succession, once again, to a child too young to rule.
Albert IV in an imagined portrait by Anton Boys, painted in the late sixteenth century.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Anton Boys · Public domain
Four Habsburg administrations at once
That child, Albert V, was seven, and the cousin who took over his
guardianship, William, governed competently until his own sudden,
childless death in 1406 - the moment that actually broke the family
apart. An old prediction of Emperor Charles IV's, that the Habsburgs
would one day humble themselves by dividing their own inheritance,
played out in full: the house split permanently into an Albertine
line holding Austria for the child Albert V, and a Leopoldine line
descended from Leopold III, itself split three ways among his
surviving sons - Leopold the elder keeping Switzerland, Alsace and
Swabia, Ernest taking Styria, Carinthia and Carniola, and Frederick
receiving Tyrol. Four separate Habsburg administrations now governed
what had once been, however imperfectly, a single family patrimony.
Leopold the elder had already had his own costly adventure abroad,
losing an entire army at Lake Garda in 1401 and buying his own freedom
from Milanese captivity only by promising to abandon the campaign; he
returned to ordinary administration until William's death called him
back to Vienna to share young Albert V's guardianship with his brother
Ernest - a co-regency neither man wanted and neither could make work.
A country left to banditry
The result was exactly what a shared, contested guardianship over a
distant child-heir usually produces: two rival factions, power
swinging back and forth between them as each gained temporary
advantage, and both using every swing to enrich themselves and punish
the other's supporters through what Coxe calls "a species of legal
tyranny." With no strong hand actually running the country, the
nobility reverted to the lawlessness earlier dukes had spent
generations suppressing - robbers again infested the roads, towns
were plundered with impunity, and Austria fell, in Coxe's judgment,
into a state of disorder worse than at any point since the House of
Habsburg had first taken possession of it more than a century earlier.
Leopold died in 1411, forty years old and childless, leaving Austria's
disorder to whichever of his brothers, or his own young ward, could
finally impose the order four generations of dividing and subdividing
the family's own inheritance had made impossible to keep.
Three kingdoms and a crown
peakDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Albert V's own guardians, uncles Leopold and Ernest, had actively
encouraged him toward hunting and idle amusement rather than
government - a young ward kept distracted was a young ward who did
not ask why his own inheritance was being plundered. His tutors
thought otherwise, giving him a genuine education in the sciences,
statecraft and religion despite his guardians' preferences, and when
Leopold died in 1411, Emperor Sigismund declared the fourteen-year-old
of age early rather than let Ernest's own misrule continue unchecked.
Vienna greeted him as a deliverer. Albert, who had watched his uncles'
feuding wreck the country for a decade, answered that welcome by
abandoning the hunting and amusements that had defined his childhood
and applying himself seriously to government - sound laws, close
attention to justice, a sustained campaign against the banditry that
had run unchecked through his uncles' chaotic regency. Austria, by its
own chroniclers' proud account, became an island of order while its
neighbors tore themselves apart, a striking reversal for a duchy that
only a few years earlier had been in what Coxe calls a "deplorable
state."
Alone successful
Much of that transformation rested on one relationship: Albert's bond
with his father-in-law, Sigismund, King of Hungary and Bohemia and
Holy Roman Emperor, whose own turbulent path to three crowns had
taught him exactly how much a stable, capable ally was worth.
Bohemia's religious wars became Albert's proving ground. During
Sigismund's third campaign against the Hussites in 1431, the main
German army broke and fled the moment the Hussites appeared, while
Albert turned his own Austrian troops into Moravia instead, drove out
the raiding Taborites, and held the province securely for the rest of
the war - Coxe's own verdict blunt: while every other German
contingent panicked at the mere name of the Hussites, Albert "at the
head of his brave Austrians, was alone successful."
Sigismund's gratitude went further than praise. Over the opposition of
his own wife - who wanted her daughter's inheritance to go instead to
the King of Poland, whom she hoped to marry herself despite a
forty-year age gap - Sigismund worked to secure Albert the succession
to Hungary and Bohemia outright, arresting the empress when her
scheming grew too dangerous to ignore. Dying and thwarted at every
turn but this one, Sigismund summoned the nobles of both kingdoms to
his deathbed in 1437 and delivered what Coxe records as a direct plea
rather than a formal decree: "I give him my kingdom, or rather I give
him to my kingdoms, to whom I can give or wish nothing better." Those
present seized Albert's hand in tears and swore allegiance on the
spot. Sigismund died the next day.
The crown his family had wanted for a century and a half
Hungary accepted him without real difficulty. Bohemia proved harder -
the Hussites rejected the succession outright, preferring a Polish
candidate they could "converse with... without an interpreter" to
another German ruler, and brought in Polish cavalry to back the claim
but Albert moved faster than his rivals, was crowned at Prague amid
genuine celebration, and forced a truce that closed the contest for
good. In the midst of this fighting, the German electors turned to
him as well, judging his extensive territories and proven talents the
best available answer to the empire's own disorder and the rising
Ottoman threat together. He was never formally crowned emperor, but
Coxe judges he "obtained and deserved a place among the emperors" all
the same: for the first time since Rudolf I founded the House of
Austria on the imperial throne a century and a half earlier, and the
first time ever, a Habsburg duke held Austria, Hungary, Bohemia and
the German crown all at once.
Albert and Elizabeth at prayer, with the crowns of Bohemia, Hungary and the Empire, imagined by Karl Russ in 1820.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Karl Russ · Public domain
He governed the empire itself with the same competence he had already
shown in Austria - reforming corrupt courts, curbing the secret
tribunals of Westphalia, sketching an early version of the public
peace and administrative "circles" system a later Habsburg emperor
would finish building. But the crisis that ended his reign came from
the east, where Sultan Murad II's armies, already masters of Smyrna,
Thessalonica and much of Greece, saw Sigismund's death as their
opening to strike before Albert could consolidate what he had just
inherited. He hurried to defend the Serbian fortress of Smederevo and
was still in the field when it fell and its garrison was massacred;
dysentery tore through both camps before the armies could properly
engage, forcing the Ottomans to retreat - and striking Albert just as
hard. Advised to rest, he pressed on toward Vienna anyway, repeating
"I shall recover if I can only once more behold the walls of Vienna,"
and worsened his own condition further by eating melons on the
journey. He died short of the city, in a village near Esztergom, on 17
October 1439 - forty-three years old, and not even two full years
into the reign that had, for one brief moment, reunited under a single
Habsburg ruler more territory than his family had ever held before or
would hold again for generations.
Crowned on his mother's bosom
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Albert V died leaving a pregnant widow and three thrones with three
different rules for succession: Austria passed only through male
heirs, while Hungary and Bohemia were both elective kingdoms whose
estates could, in principle, choose anyone. Hungary's nobles, dreading
a long regency with the Ottomans pressing their southern frontier,
pushed Elizabeth toward marrying the King of Poland and handing him
the crown outright - and the ambassadors carrying that offer had
barely left when Elizabeth gave birth to a son, baptized Ladislaus and
known ever after as Ladislaus Posthumus. Too late to recall the
embassy, she answered with audacity instead: in May 1440 she carried
the infant to Székesfehérvár, where the Archbishop of Esztergom
crowned him king of Hungary on his own mother's chest. Hungary split
into two camps, one behind the adult Polish claimant and his ablest
general John Hunyadi, the other loyal to the infant and his widowed
mother - strong enough to hold Upper Hungary but too weak to dislodge
Hunyadi's party from the rest of the kingdom. Elizabeth retreated to
Vienna, placed her son under Frederick of Styria's guardianship, and
mortgaged both a border city and the sacred Crown of St. Stephen
itself to secure his support; she died at Győr in December 1442, "not
without suspicions of poison," and the Polish claimant simply assumed
full royal title in the vacuum her death left behind.
Ladislaus Posthumus, painted about 1457.
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Unknown artist · Public domain
Bohemia handled the same problem with a Habsburg twist of its own.
Elizabeth had claimed the crown for her infant son immediately, but
the Calixtin party balked - "a child cannot govern a kingdom" - and
offered it first to a Bavarian duke, who declined it as belonging to
Ladislaus by right, then to Frederick himself, who answered with the
same principle in almost the same words: "I will not rob my relation
of his right." The Bohemians named Ladislaus king in absentia and
governed through two rival co-regents until factional infighting
delivered sole power, in practice if not in name, to a rising figure
named George of Poděbrady. Hungary, meanwhile, was handed back to
Ladislaus by circumstance rather than negotiation once his Polish
rival died fighting the Ottomans at Varna in 1444 - though Frederick
still refused to surrender either the boy or the Hungarian crown he
held, leaving the kingdom to Hunyadi's regency instead.
A ransom by siege
Frederick's reluctance hardened once his own fortunes rose: he took
Ladislaus to Rome for his own imperial coronation rather than release
him to any of the three kingdoms clamoring for his return, and left
him in papal custody afterward when he continued on to Naples. An
attempt by deputies from all three nations to help the boy escape was
discovered and blocked. Frustrated nobles finally gave up on
negotiation entirely: an Austrian noble named Ulrich Eyczing raised an
army of sixteen thousand men and laid siege to Frederick's own
residence at Wiener Neustadt, and in 1452, with no real choice left,
Frederick gave up his ward. Ladislaus entered Vienna to genuine public
celebration under a new three-way regency - Hunyadi governing Hungary,
Poděbrady governing Bohemia, and the boy's own maternal uncle, the
Count of Cilli, taking Austria - that finally gave each kingdom the
local authority it had been demanding for over a decade, even without
their sovereign's full attention. Cilli used his privileged access to
purge Austrian nobles from office and seed the young king's mind with
suspicion of both Hunyadi and Poděbrady, until Eyczing - the very man
who had freed Ladislaus from Frederick in the first place - turned on
Cilli in turn and drove him from court under threat from an angry
crowd. Ladislaus was crowned king of Bohemia that October, guided
entirely by Poděbrady's counsel, though his religious sympathies,
shaped by years among Catholic tutors, already ran against the
Calixtin majority he was now expected to rule.
I pardon the eldest
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Ladislaus's own dependence on his regents met its sternest test at
Belgrade, the fortress guarding Hungary's southern approach, where
Sultan Mehmed II laid siege with an army and a river flotilla in 1456.
John Hunyadi, still regent in all but title, broke the Ottoman ships
blocking the Danube and Sava and reached the garrison in time to
resupply it before the sultan's main assault came - an assault that
nearly succeeded anyway, Ottoman troops planting their own banners on
the ramparts before Hunyadi's presence turned a collapsing defense
into a counterattack that drove the Turks out with heavy losses and
wounded Mehmed himself. The siege broke after a day and a night of
fighting, and the Ottoman army withdrew having lost some thirty
thousand men. Hunyadi did not long survive his own greatest victory -
a fever brought on by the exertions of the siege killed him at Zemun
that August, leaving two sons, Ladislaus and Matthias, whom Coxe
credits with promise to match their father's fame.
The siege of Belgrade in 1456, in an Ottoman miniature.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Unknown artist · Public domain
A murder, a pardon, a betrayal
Ladislaus Posthumus felt the loss chiefly as relief: freed from a
regent more powerful than the king himself, he transferred his
patronage to Count Cilli, his own maternal uncle, and nominated him
governor of Hungary - inflaming the nobles who had idolized Hunyadi's
memory. The mutual suspicion broke into open violence in March 1457,
when Cilli and the elder Hunyadi brother met by chance, traded bitter
accusations, and Cilli seized a sword from a bystander and wounded
Ladislaus Hunyadi in the head; Ladislaus's own followers rushed to his
defense, and Cilli was mortally wounded in the brawl that followed.
Hunyadi's widow met the king soon after, dressed in mourning with her
younger son Matthias at her side, and threw herself at his feet
begging forgiveness for her elder son's act. Ladislaus raised her up
himself, promised to treat her as a mother and her sons as brothers,
pardoned the elder Hunyadi outright, and sent the family away laden
with gifts after a day of shared festivity. Reassured, both brothers
followed the king back to Buda - where, once they had let their guard
down completely, German troops sealed the palace gates, arrested both
young men, and beheaded Ladislaus Hunyadi on the spot. The betrayal of
a solemn pardon turned Hungary against its own king outright: Hunyadi's
widow rallied her husband's old supporters and threatened to hand
Hungary's border fortresses to the Ottomans unless Matthias was freed,
forcing Ladislaus to flee the kingdom under public curses, taking the
surviving brother with him to Vienna as a hostage.
*The Farewell of László Hunyadi*, painted by Gyula Benczúr in 1866.
Hungarian National Gallery, Budapest · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Gyula Benczúr · Public domain
Deliver us from evil
Ladislaus's own reign ended before the consequences could fully play
out. He traveled to Prague to marry a French princess, fell suddenly
and mortally ill in the midst of the wedding preparations, and died
within thirty-six hours, seventeen years old, reciting the Lord's
Prayer and asking, as a final renunciation of worldly vanity, that his
own prized golden hair be cut off. Coxe's own verdict on his short
life is far less generous than the mourning that followed it: a
"feeble and irresolute character" who never once showed the courage
his father had displayed at the same age, and whose betrayal of the
Hunyadi family would, had he lived, likely have kept Hungary in open
revolt. German rumor blamed his sudden death on poison and pointed
directly at Poděbrady, who went on to claim the Bohemian throne once
it fell vacant; Coxe sides with the Bohemian historians who
investigated the charge and concluded the actual cause was plague -
though the accusation outlived any proof for it, and the fight over
what Ladislaus left behind was only just beginning.
An unnatural contest
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
The 1458 partition of Austria - Lower Austria to Frederick, Upper
Austria to his brother Albert VI, a slice of Carinthia to their cousin
Sigismund, with all three sharing Vienna as a joint residence - solved
nothing. Frederick's own indolence made him unpopular with the
capital's citizens, and Albert, never satisfied with his own share of
the inheritance, fanned that discontent into open war. Vienna split
into factions, the senate backing the emperor and the populace
rallying behind a demagogue named Wolfgang Holzer in Albert's cause.
Frederick sheltered in the citadel with barely two hundred men,
resolved, in his own words, to be buried under its ruins before he
would surrender to his own rebellious subjects - and when a messenger
reached the empire's assembled princes warning that the garrison had
only three weeks of food left, they voted to send help too slowly, as
always, to matter. What actually saved him was faster and closer to
home: George of Poděbrady, King of Bohemia, marched thirteen thousand
troops to break the siege in person and then personally arbitrated a
settlement between the warring brothers.
Frederick III, attributed to Hans Burgkmair after a lost portrait of 1468.
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Hans Burgkmair the Elder · Public domain
The end of the feud
The arbitration lasted no longer than any earlier settlement between
them. Albert soon tried to claim Lower Austria outright and took
Vienna's own oath of allegiance; Frederick answered by securing both
the imperial ban and a papal excommunication against his own brother.
Mediators from every direction tried to stop what Coxe calls an
"unnatural contest" between siblings, and Albert's own governance in
the interval did more to undo him than Frederick's diplomacy ever
managed - arbitrary rule and constant exactions alienated the very
Viennese who had once backed him, and even Holzer, the demagogue who
had led the earlier revolt against Frederick, switched sides and began
working for the emperor's restoration. Albert discovered the plot,
had Holzer executed, and confiscated the property of everyone
connected to it - a final, vindictive act before he died suddenly on 4
December 1463, in the middle of preparing to renew the war one more
time. With his death Frederick lost an "active and turbulent rival,"
in Coxe's own phrase, without having to defeat him outright - a war
that had cost Vienna two sieges and dragged in a Bohemian king as
arbitrator, closed not by a settlement either brother had wanted, but
simply because one of them stopped living long enough to keep
fighting it.
Enemies nearer home than the Turks
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
While Frederick fought his own brother for Austria, a separate crisis
in Germany threatened his hold on the imperial crown itself. Frederick
the Victorious, regent of the Palatinate, had assumed full electoral
authority with the estates' approval and the pope's confirmation -
approval the emperor alone withheld, earning himself a formidable
enemy. The elector spent years building a coalition against him,
drawing in two archbishop-electors, a landgrave, and - most damaging
of all - Frederick's own brother Albert and cousin Sigismund, and won
George of Poděbrady's support outright with the offer of the imperial
crown itself. In 1461 the confederates convened rival diets without
the emperor's consent and moved toward formal deposition, sending
Frederick a scathing letter blaming Germany's disorder squarely on his
own weakness and fifteen years of absence from the diets he was
supposed to preside over.
Threatened with the loss of everything his family had spent nearly two
centuries reclaiming, Frederick abandoned his usual indolence and
fought back with intrigue rather than arms - splitting his enemies
apart one ambassador and circular letter at a time, holding
Brandenburg through its own distrust of the Palatinate, securing
Saxony despite its ties to Bavaria, and even peeling away Poděbrady
himself by offering to mediate the Bohemian king's worsening quarrel
with Rome. His strongest ally proved to be Pope Pius II, who had every
personal reason to keep his own benefactor on the throne. A related
war over the archbishopric of Mainz spilled into open battle - the
Elector Palatine crushed a rival coalition at Seckingen, taking a
bishop and a margrave prisoner - but battlefield losses proved almost
irrelevant next to the diplomatic collapse of the league itself. One
by one the confederates made separate peace, and the Elector Palatine
abandoned the deposition scheme entirely in exchange for narrower
territorial gains of his own.
The future Pius II presents Frederick III to his bride Eleonora at Siena in 1452, painted by Pinturicchio in the early 1500s.
Piccolomini Library, Siena · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Pinturicchio · Public domain
An empire too divided to fight the Turks
Frederick kept his crown, but Coxe's own verdict on the whole affair is
withering: the constant infighting among German princes left the
empire unable to answer a genuine external threat, as Ottoman armies -
already masters of Constantinople - made their first incursions into
German territory during Frederick's own reign. The Elector Palatine
spoke for most of his peers when he said he had "enemies nearer home
than the Turks," and Frederick himself, Coxe notes with open
disapproval, often treated Ottoman pressure on Hungary as a convenient
check on his own rival there rather than a danger worth uniting
against. Even Pius II's own zeal for a crusade collapsed into
factionalism: when Poděbrady offered to lead an army against the Turks
himself, the papal legate argued it would serve Christendom better to
turn German arms against the "heretic" Bohemian king instead - the
same preference Pius's successor pursued even harder against the very
ally who had just helped save Frederick's own throne.
No compact with heretics
The gratitude Frederick owed Poděbrady lasted only a few years before
papal politics pulled him into an alliance against his own rescuer.
Pope Pius II, who as a cardinal had helped negotiate the compacts
protecting Bohemia's Calixtin majority, reversed course completely
once he held the tiara himself, reviving the church's old claim to
total authority over Bohemian religious practice. When Bohemia's
Catholics demanded Poděbrady go further than concession and annul the
compacts entirely, and Pius refused even to reconfirm an agreement his
own predecessors had already approved, Poděbrady summoned a diet and
spoke plainly: the compacts were the only thing that had ended
Bohemia's religious civil war, and "I and my wife have followed them
from our childhood, and I am determined to maintain them till my
death." When the papal legate answered with a tirade, Poděbrady had
him thrown out and imprisoned on bread and water. Pius annulled the
compacts outright in 1463 and threatened excommunication - a crisis
defused only when Poděbrady apologized and Frederick, still mindful of
his own debt, personally interceded to suspend the sentence.
Frederick's gratitude did not survive Pius's own death the following
year. His successor pursued Poděbrady with even greater hostility,
and by 1467 imperial ambassadors were openly backing a papal call for
a crusade against Bohemia; though the diet itself refused the
proposal, the pope formally deposed Poděbrady anyway and let crusade
preachers operate freely across German and Austrian territory.
Poděbrady, furious at being betrayed by the very ally his own troops
had once saved from starvation, declared war outright and invaded
Austria as far as the Danube.
A mock diet at Olomouc
Unable to muster real support from the empire's own princes, Frederick
turned to a more dangerous solution: he offered the Bohemian crown
itself to Matthias Corvinus, King of Hungary, in exchange for turning
against the man who had once ransomed him from Bohemian captivity and
made him king in the first place. Matthias, dazzled despite everything
he owed Poděbrady, invaded Bohemia while papal intrigue simultaneously
stirred the kingdom's Catholic minority into open revolt - but
Poděbrady, still capable at defending his own throne even as an old
man, crushed the uprising and threw back the invasion, forcing a peace
in 1469. It lasted barely any time: persuaded that no agreement with a
"heretic" king carried any real obligation, Matthias resumed the war,
overran Moravia and Silesia, and staged what Coxe pointedly calls a
"mock diet" at Olomouc, where a hand-picked assembly of Catholic
loyalists elected him King of Bohemia on the spot - acting for all
purposes as its rightful sovereign even while Poděbrady still held
Prague and the loyalty of most of the kingdom. Frederick, who had
handed Matthias the pretext for the whole campaign, now got cold feet
at the thought of a single ambitious rival ruling both Hungary and
Bohemia together, and quietly withheld the support he had promised,
disguising his retreat as a pilgrimage to Rome.
A sovereign conversant with their language
Poděbrady answered both rivals with a single stroke, proposing as his
own successor Vladislaus of Poland, a candidate who satisfied nearly
everyone: Bohemia's Catholics welcomed a prince of their own faith,
the Calixtins saw the surest way to keep both Frederick and Matthias
off the throne, and the wider nation liked the idea of a king who
actually spoke their language. The estates approved the nomination
without real opposition. Matthias, furious at being passed over so
completely, kept fighting until the two armies - each led personally
by a capable and experienced king - fought each other to exhaustion
and agreed to a truce in July 1470. Poděbrady did not live to see it
hold for long, dying the following year; Frederick, sensing one more
opportunity, put himself forward as a candidate a second time and
found even less support than before. Vladislaus was duly elected, and
Frederick, unable to win the crown himself, settled for backing him
over Matthias instead - a policy that would keep stoking Hungarian
unrest for years, even as it settled nothing of Frederick's own much
larger ambitions.
The frogs and the stork
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Matthias Corvinus had every reason to hate Frederick by the mid-1470s:
after being egged into war against Poděbrady and then abandoned
mid-campaign, refused the Bohemian crown he had been promised, watched
Frederick formally invest a rival with it instead, had his own
marriage proposal for the emperor's daughter dismissed outright, and
saw Frederick shelter a rebellious Hungarian archbishop - any one of
which, Coxe notes, would have justified a hostile prince's outrage.
Matthias first survived a war on two fronts of his own, defeating a
Polish-Bohemian coalition and then smashing an Ottoman army supporting
Wallachia's breakaway prince, before declaring formal war on Frederick
and invading Austria outright.
An emperor humiliated, then humiliated again
The first invasion was swift and total: within a month Matthias had
overrun most of Lower Austria, besieged Vienna itself, and taken every
fortress along the Danube as far as Krems. Frederick fled to Linz and
bought back his own capital for a hundred thousand ducats he then
simply refused to pay once Matthias got tied up in fresh wars
elsewhere. Furious, Matthias made peace with Bohemia instead and
invaded a second time; this campaign took four hard years of siege
warfare rather than one swift month, but ended even more completely,
with Vienna's own capture and the fall of Wiener Neustadt, Frederick's
favorite residence.
Matthias Corvinus at Vienna, in an engraving of 1880.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Unknown artist · Public domain
Driven from his own hereditary lands, Frederick wandered from city to
city and convent to convent for years, met everywhere with sympathy
and nowhere with real help. He bore the humiliation with a strange,
almost theatrical calm, repeating the maxim that "to forget what
cannot be recovered is supreme felicity," and took his revenge on
Vienna's citizens in words rather than arms - comparing them, for
their long history of turning against him, to the frogs in the fable
who rejected a harmless log as king and got a stork that devoured them
instead. Years of personal appeals finally produced only a token force
under Duke Albert of Saxony, who managed to slow Matthias's advance
through skillful maneuvering but was forced to an armistice without
real reinforcement from either the empire or Frederick himself.
Austria was formally ceded to Matthias's occupation in November 1487,
to be returned only once Frederick paid off his old debts in full - or
reverted outright, the treaty specified, should Matthias die first.
A stork of Frederick's own
Astrologers had promised Frederick his rival would die within the
year, and for once they were right: Matthias Corvinus died in April
1490 after a prolonged illness, opening the way for Habsburg Austria's
recovery after more than a decade under Hungarian occupation and
reopening, at the same time, an immediate contest for Hungary's own
vacant throne. Frederick and Maximilian put themselves forward as
candidates, citing an old succession compact already agreed with
Matthias, but the Hungarian diet chose a rival claimant instead on 15
July - and Maximilian refused to accept the rejection quietly. Rallying
his father's own Austrian subjects, he drove the occupying Hungarian
garrisons out of Austria in six weeks and pushed on into Hungary
itself, exploiting the usual factional chaos that followed any new
king's accession. He captured Székesfehérvár, the traditional
coronation city of Hungary's own kings, and was preparing to march on
Buda when a mutiny among his own troops forced him to fall back into
Austria.
Neither side could press its advantage further, and the two met at
Bratislava and settled generous terms: the rival king kept the
Hungarian crown and formally renounced any claim to the Austrian
territory Matthias had once conquered, while Maximilian received the
honorary title of King of Hungary, a payment of a hundred thousand
ducats toward his own war costs, and a renewed family compact
entailing the Hungarian succession on Frederick's own line should the
new king die without a son. Between Matthias's death and Maximilian's
own energy and skill, Frederick recovered the Austrian homeland he had
lost for more than a decade, gained financial compensation on top of
it, and was finally relieved of a crisis his own obstinacy and
indolence had done so much to create in the first place.
The letter and the ring
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
While Frederick wandered Germany as a landless exile, he pursued a
diplomatic project that would ultimately matter more to his family's
future than anything he lost to Matthias: a marriage between his son
Maximilian and Mary, heiress of Burgundy - by then the richest
territorial bloc in Western Europe, stretching from Provence to the
North Sea through generations of dukes who had accumulated Flanders,
Artois, Holland, Brabant and more through purchase, inheritance and
outright extortion. Duke Charles the Bold offered a bargain: his only
daughter and heiress for Maximilian, if Frederick would elevate
Burgundy into a kingdom in its own right. Frederick traveled to Trier
with the fourteen-year-old Maximilian, formally invested Charles with
several imperial territories, and watched Charles prepare every
regalia for a royal coronation - a throne built in the cathedral, the
princess already affianced - before abruptly leaving under a flimsy
excuse. The real cause, Coxe explains, was French interference: Louis
XI had worked on Frederick's own naturally suspicious temperament,
warning that a crowned Charles would never be satisfied and would soon
revive his old ambitions for the imperial crown itself. Neither side
fully trusted the other to begin with, and the standoff collapsed the
arrangement without a wedding or a coronation.
Charles the Bold, painted by Rogier van der Weyden about 1460.
Gemäldegalerie, Berlin · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Rogier van der Weyden · Public domain
Charles the Bold died in battle at Nancy on 5 January 1477, and his
death threatened to unravel everything at once. Louis XI moved
immediately, claiming Mary's hand for his own son while seizing
Burgundy and parts of Artois and Flanders outright; Mary's own
counselors, bought or terrified, urged her to accept the French match,
while the people of Ghent rose in revolt and effectively held their
own sovereign hostage to extract political concessions. By every
practical measure, Maximilian's cause had no real support anywhere in
Mary's own court or country.
A letter and a ring, kept
What saved the match was the impression Maximilian had made at Trier:
Charles had returned from that failed ceremony full of praise for his
prospective son-in-law, calling him the most promising prince in
Europe - words that had lodged deeply enough in Mary's own memory
that when she became free to choose for herself, they mattered more
than any councilor's advice. When the Elector of Mainz presented the
letter and ring she had once sent Maximilian at her own father's
direction, she recognized them as tokens of a promise she intended to
keep, and no amount of protest from her own advisors could move her.
The marriage was solemnized by proxy in April 1477.
Mary of Burgundy, attributed to Niklas Reiser, about 1500.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Niklas Reiser · Public domain
Maximilian arrived in person that August, and it was what he did next
that secured his position for good. Only eighteen, with no army of his
own, he rallied the Burgundian Netherlands' defense, held off the
French advance, and won his new subjects' loyalty by confirming their
traditional privileges rather than ruling by force; pressure from the
German diet forced Louis to restore several imperial territories he
had seized, freeing Maximilian to besiege Thérouanne and win a bloody,
decisive victory at Guinegate on 7 August 1479 that stabilized
Burgundian rule over the Low Countries for good - proof, delivered on
a battlefield rather than in a marriage contract, that the Habsburg
claim to Burgundy could actually be defended.
Guinegate in 1479, a woodcut by Wolf Traut for Maximilian's *Triumphal Arch*.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Wolf Traut · Public domain
Reducing Ghent
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Mary of Burgundy's death on 26 March 1482, still young and leaving two
infant children, undid much of what her marriage had secured.
Flanders's own turbulent population had never fully accepted
Maximilian as anything but a foreign consort, and once Mary was gone
they treated his continued war against France as personal ambition
rather than a defense of their own interests. The Flemish estates
seized custody of the young Philip, appointed his guardians
themselves, and shut Maximilian out of his own son's upbringing
entirely - a dispute Louis XI exploited immediately, negotiating
directly with the Flemish states over Maximilian's head. The
resulting Treaty of Arras, concluded that December, forced terms
Maximilian had no real power to refuse: his infant daughter Margaret
was betrothed to the French dauphin and sent to France as his intended
bride, carrying Franche-Comté and Artois as her dowry, while Philip's
guardianship remained with the Flemish estates alone.
The estates' own suspicion of Maximilian only deepened from there -
his continued presence nearby, his preference for foreign advisors,
his resentment at losing any share in governing Flanders. War followed,
with Flemish rebels backed openly by France, but Maximilian pressed
his own military advantage hard enough that by July 1485 Ghent itself
submitted, its burghers forced to recognize him as guardian of his son
and governor of Flanders in exchange for his promise not to remove
Philip from the Netherlands. With Flanders reasserted, Maximilian
turned toward France itself, allying with the Duke of Orléans and the
Duke of Brittany against the French regency - a coalition that
collapsed entirely once the young King Charles VIII took the field in
person, recovered Thérouanne, overran Brittany, and crushed the rebels
outright at Saint-Aubin. Orléans was captured, and on 28 August 1488
the Duke of Brittany signed a peace reducing his own duchy to French
vassalage.
A city rises against its own king
Ghent's own submission proved no more permanent than any earlier peace.
Foreign garrisons, the misconduct of German troops Maximilian had
brought in, and fresh demands for money on top of what he already
refused to account for turned discontent into open insurrection once
again. When the people of Bruges summoned him, he went in person,
trusting a governor's promise that thousands of loyal burghers stood
ready to back him. Instead, the morning after his ceremonial entry on
9 February 1488, word arrived that Ghent's own rebels had taken Ypres
and Courtrai; as Maximilian tried to leave the city, the population
rose as one, seized the gates and market square, and demanded he
dismiss his foreign troops and hand over the counselors they accused
of corruption.
A false rumor that an avenging army was already marching on Bruges
tipped the crowd into open fury: they rang the alarm bell, raised the
banner of Brabant, and very nearly stormed the palace to kill
Maximilian outright before their own leaders talked them down. When
Maximilian addressed the crowd directly the next day - "Here I am,
behold me ready to live and die with you" - the majority dragged him
instead to an apothecary's shop and held him there for days while
torturing, beheading or exiling his own ministers in the market square
outside. Ghent executed thirteen more of his supporters and, together
with Bruges, formally stripped him of his son's guardianship, setting
up a new government in Philip's name with the King of France
recognized as its overlord. Moved afterward to a nobleman's house and
confined like a common criminal, Maximilian was at least spared
delivery into French hands by the people of Bruges themselves, who
resisted Ghent's own demands to hand him over - and throughout the
ordeal, Coxe records, he bore himself with a courage and dignity that
did more than any army to cool his captors' rage.
The Cranenburg house on the market square at Bruges, where Maximilian was held in 1488, on a postcard of about 1905.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Pratyeka · CC BY-SA 3.0
No trace of resentment
Neighboring provinces petitioned for his release, but it was Frederick
who finally forced the issue - abandoning, for once, the indolence
that had defined most of his own reign to fight for his son with real
urgency. He assembled fifteen thousand men at Cologne within weeks and
pushed into Brabant, terrifying the Flemings into releasing Maximilian
on 16 May 1488, though only after extracting a renewed promise to
honor the Treaty of Arras in full and withdraw every foreign soldier
from the country.
Maximilian showed no anger at any of it. He went straight to church to
give thanks, telling the crowd outside, "We are now at peace," then
visited the very shop where his captivity had begun and read an
insulting inscription scrawled on its walls without any visible
reaction, forgiving the people who now knelt before him begging
pardon. Back with his father, he quietly talked Frederick out of
further war against the rebels; when Frederick pressed on regardless,
besieging Ghent for three months before handing the campaign off and
returning home, it was diplomacy rather than the siege that finally
closed the conflict. King Charles VIII, eager to pursue his own
designs on a newly vulnerable Brittany, concluded the Peace of
Frankfurt in July 1489 - restoring Breton conquests, confirming the
Arras settlement, and pressing the Flemish rebels into finally
accepting Maximilian's guardianship of his own son.
Stolen from the altar
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
While Maximilian fought for Austria and Hungary, a second inheritance
dispute in Brittany would test his family's fortunes just as severely.
Duke Francis II died in September 1488 leaving only two daughters,
with thirteen-year-old Anne inheriting a duchy immediately torn
between pro-French and pro-English factions. Like Mary of Burgundy
before her, Anne became the object of intense competition, and
Maximilian - whose interest in the match was as much about checking
French power as securing the duchy outright - opened negotiations even
before her father's death, pursuing the courtship in careful secrecy
to avoid provoking French intervention. Anne, won over as much by
Maximilian's own reputation as by any rival's qualities, agreed to a
prince whose rank and alliances seemed capable of actually protecting
her duchy; the marriage was solemnized by proxy, without Maximilian
himself present, sometime around the start of 1490. The secrecy that
protected the negotiation could not protect what came next.
Anne of Brittany between three saints, painted by Jean Bourdichon in her *Grandes Heures*, 1503–08.
Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Jean Bourdichon · Public domain
A mock treaty
Charles VIII, having just turned nineteen and taken the reins of
government himself, moved against Brittany with a duplicity Coxe
traces straight back to his own tutelage under the regent Anne of
Beaujeu. Recognizing that conquering the duchy outright would be
brutally difficult against a duchess backed by the empire and England
both, he pivoted to a subtler plan: marrying Anne himself, despite his
own existing marriage contract with Maximilian's own daughter
Margaret, who had lived at the French court as queen-in-waiting for
seven years already. He kept faith scrupulously with the Peace of
Frankfurt's terms regarding Flanders to lull Maximilian's suspicions,
stalled on the Brittany provisions with excuses about English troops
still in Breton service, and when the marriage between Maximilian and
Anne was formally announced, used the shock of it to peel away her
remaining allies - buying off one rival suitor with the surrender of
Nantes and pressing French troops forward against Rennes, the last
stronghold left to the duchy.
Maximilian scrambled for help but moved far too slowly against a
French court working with speed and total secrecy. Anne, who still
detested the French for the suffering they had brought her country
and found Charles himself personally repellent, held out until her own
generals and counselors, bought or intimidated, left her without hope
of relief and her capital under blockade. She finally agreed to terms
that looked generous - French withdrawal, arbitration, safe passage
into Germany - terms the French honored to the letter, right up until
Maximilian's own ambassadors, sent to escort their new queen home,
learned instead that she had gone to Langeais and married Charles VIII
there. Brittany was absorbed into the French crown in the same stroke.
An indemnity, not a victory
Maximilian's fury was total - his own daughter publicly humiliated
after seven years as France's presumptive queen, and his own wife
taken from him after their marriage had already been solemnized. He
built a coalition with England and Aragon, but found exactly the kind
of half-hearted support that had failed him at Bruges: the Swiss
offered only mediation, German troops arrived too slowly, and
England's Henry VII sold his own neutrality to France for cash and a
pension rather than fight, while Aragon's Ferdinand accepted a
territorial bribe to abandon the coalition as well. The resulting
Treaty of Senlis returned Margaret and compensated Maximilian with
Franche-Comté, Artois and several lesser territories in place of
Brittany - honorable terms, in Coxe's own judgment, but a settlement
that could not undo the personal insult of losing a wife to the very
kingdom he had spent a decade fighting. It was, Coxe notes, the moment
a rivalry with no natural cause - France and Austria had shared no
real border and no real quarrel before Maximilian's marriage to Mary
of Burgundy planted the two powers against each other - hardened into
a hostility between the houses of Habsburg and Valois that would go on
soaking Europe in blood for more than three centuries.
The confederacy of St. George
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Frederick's record as emperor came, by the end of his reign, in for a
harder-edged assessment than his own passivity in most crises might
suggest. Coxe judges him unfairly blamed for every civil war that
afflicted Germany during his decades on the throne - languid and
inactive by temperament, certainly, but the same reign also produced
real, lasting reforms to how the empire actually governed itself.
Frederick's own government laid out, for the first time, a genuine
system for raising military contingents from the empire's princes and
states rather than leaving the matter to whatever power and
self-interest happened to apply in a given crisis, funded by fixed
assessments collected through imperial commissaries - about the most
workable system, Coxe judges, the empire's own patchwork of jealous,
semi-independent territories could realistically support.
The right of private warfare proved harder to solve: under it, any
noble, town or even guild could formally declare feud against any
other party over a grievance real or imagined, with no higher
authority required to approve it, and the abuse reached genuinely
absurd extremes - associations of tradesmen and household servants
exchanging formal declarations of war "on the most ridiculous
pretences." One surviving challenge came from a private individual
addressed directly to Frederick himself: "I will no longer obey your
grace, but will be the enemy of your country, and your subjects, and
will do them as much harm as possible." Frederick's own early instinct
had been to suppress the regional leagues that towns and nobles formed
for mutual defense, on the theory that any organized association not
answerable to the emperor was a threat to his own authority - he had
personally worked to dissolve the Swiss confederacy on exactly this
reasoning. Decades of failure eventually pushed him toward the
opposite strategy: build a confederacy loyal to the crown instead.
Built on an old shield
Swabia offered the ideal testing ground, dense with imperial towns and
countless small lordships answerable to nobody but the emperor
himself. Frederick proclaimed a ten-year public peace and convened the
Swabian states around an old noble league called the Shield of St.
George, widened far beyond nobility alone to include princes, towns
and vassals together. It began modestly and grew fast, reaching
twenty-two towns, thirteen prelates, twelve counts and three hundred
fifty knights within a year, helped along by the threat of fines and
the imperial ban for anyone who refused to join; powerful princes
followed, and the league's own combined weight finally gave Frederick
something his personal authority had never managed alone - the
strongholds of robber-nobles came down by the hundred, and even the
feuding House of Bavaria was forced into line.
That new authority let Frederick settle a personal grievance he could
never have pressed alone. In 1485 Albert of Munich seized Regensburg,
a city his own ancestors had once held, and - without so much as
informing Frederick - married the emperor's own daughter Cunegunda,
securing through her a claim on the reversion of Tyrol. Maximilian
brokered a first reconciliation, but Albert simply refused to honor
his own promise to restore the city, and Frederick, now backed by the
full strength of the empire and the Swabian League, published the ban
against both Albert and Regensburg outright. An army of more than
twenty thousand assembled with unusual speed, more than a third of it
supplied by the league itself, and once again it was Maximilian's
mediation rather than the army's presence that actually settled the
matter: Albert restored Regensburg, reaffirmed his renunciation of
Tyrol, and brought his wife and daughters to visit Frederick at Linz,
where the aging emperor, his own health failing, found real comfort in
a reconciliation that finally brought both family peace and public
order to his final years.
A sound peasant
The reconciliation with Albert of Munich was very nearly Frederick's
last act as a ruling sovereign. Soon after returning to Austria he
handed over administration of both his hereditary lands and the empire
entirely to Maximilian, retiring to Linz to pursue his own favorite
studies and enjoy, for the first time in a long and turbulent reign,
real tranquility. He was seventy-eight, and had for some time suffered
from a cancerous ulcer in his leg; amputation was the only remedy his
surgeons could offer, and when the operation had to be repeated a
second time due to their own inexperience, Frederick bore both
procedures with the same characteristic calm that had carried him
through decades of political humiliation. Holding up his own severed
limb afterward, he told those present, "What difference is there
between an emperor and a peasant? or rather, is not a sound peasant
better than a sick emperor? yet I hope to enjoy the greatest good which
can happen to man; a happy exit from this transitory life."
He seemed at first to be recovering, but a rigidly kept religious fast
combined with an excessive appetite for melons - the same indulgence
that had already killed his own son Albert V decades earlier - brought
on a dysentery his weakened body could not survive. He died at Linz on
19 August 1493, seventy-eight years old, having reigned fifty-three
years - longer, Coxe notes, than any emperor since Augustus himself.
Frederick III's tomb in St Stephen's Cathedral, Vienna, by Niclas Gerhaert van Leyden.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Uoaei1 · CC BY-SA 3.0
Frederick was tall and handsome, plain in his everyday dress but
genuinely fond of jewels and splendor on ceremonial occasions;
religious, chaste, faithful to his word, and warmly affectionate
toward his own family and household. His defining trait, though, was
the same one that had shaped his entire reign for better and worse: an
almost stoic imperturbability in the face of injury and insult, which
Coxe judges too often invited exactly the contempt and fresh
aggression it was meant to absorb. It was this same unshakeable calm
that let him survive exile, siege, imprisonment of his own son, and
the loss of an entire kingdom without ever losing his throne outright
the very passivity his critics condemned was also, in the end, the
quality that outlasted every crisis it failed to prevent.
The deliverer of his country
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
Maximilian was at Innsbruck when news of his father's death reached
him, and he opened his reign in a manner that immediately set him
apart from Frederick's own decades of caution: rather than leave
frontier defense to his generals, as his father almost always had, he
personally raised fifteen thousand men on short notice and marched
against an Ottoman raiding party that had pushed into Styria and
Carniola. The Turks retreated before he even reached them, and
Maximilian arrived in Vienna to genuine acclaim as the deliverer of
his own country - a striking contrast to the humiliations Vienna had
inflicted on his father within living memory. His own name was itself
a novelty: no earlier Habsburg had ever been called Maximilian, and
Coxe credits the choice to Frederick's own fondness for astrology,
supposedly built by combining the names of the Roman generals Fabius
Maximus and Paulus Aemilius rather than any inherited family
tradition.
Maximilian, painted by Albrecht Dürer in 1519.
Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Albrecht Dürer · Public domain
After formally taking charge of the family's hereditary lands,
Maximilian married Bianca Maria Sforza, sister of Milan's own reigning
duke, on 16 March 1494 - a match driven by a substantial dowry and the
promise of leverage in Italian affairs, though Germany's nobility took
it as an insult to the family's dignity, denouncing the Sforzas as a
low-born house unworthy of an emperor's alliance. With his marriage
settled, Maximilian handed government of the Low Countries to his own
sixteen-year-old son Philip and turned to suppressing a revolt in
Guelderland led by a young pretender who had escaped his own court
after years spent as a virtual hostage there - a campaign soon left to
Duke Albert of Saxony once events in Italy pulled Maximilian away
entirely.
Bianca Maria Sforza, painted by Ambrogio de Predis about 1493.
National Gallery of Art, Washington · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Ambrogio de Predis · CC0
A new rival in the south
At the same moment, a new power was consolidating itself on Europe's
southwestern edge. Castile and Aragon, united since 1469 by the
marriage of Ferdinand and Isabella, had spent their reign curbing an
overmighty nobility and building the disciplined army and navy that
decades of war against Granada's Moors had hardened into genuine
professional forces; their conquest of Granada finally freed them from
that centuries-old threat, and in 1492 Ferdinand added Sicily to his
own crown as well, transforming Spain, within the span of Maximilian's
own accession, into a power capable of shaping the rest of Europe
rather than merely defending its own peninsula - one the House of
Austria would, in time, find far more useful as a marriage partner
than as a rival.
A conqueror by torchlight
The event that pulled Maximilian away from Guelderland was a conquest
so fast it left the whole of Europe stunned: Charles VIII of France,
pursuing his own house's old dormant claim to Naples, secured his
passage through the Alps with the help of Savoy and Ludovico Sforza,
crossed in July 1494 with twenty-two thousand men, and swept through
Milanese territory into Tuscany, driving the Medici into exile and
freeing Florence from their rule. He entered Rome itself on the night
of 31 December, marching in by torchlight in full armor like a
conqueror, and forced the Pope, who had taken refuge in the Castel
Sant'Angelo, to surrender his own fortresses and hand over his own son
as a hostage. By May, Charles was riding into Naples in triumph as its
king, mounted on a white horse and dressed in the trappings of
imperial authority, while the reigning Neapolitan king fled to the
island of Ischia rather than fight.
The speed of the conquest terrified every power with a stake in Italy,
Maximilian not least - he took Charles's adoption of imperial-style
regalia as a direct affront to his own office. Even Ludovico Sforza,
who had helped clear Charles's own path into Italy in the first place,
was the first Italian ruler to move against him, helping assemble a
secret league joining the emperor, the Pope, Milan, Florence and
Aragon in a twenty-two-year alliance meant to restore the deposed
Neapolitan king and drive the French out of Italy entirely.
The diet of Worms
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
To rally German support for the league against France, Maximilian
broke with tradition by summoning the empire's diet not to Nuremberg,
the customary site for the first assembly of a new reign, but to
Worms, closer to both the Netherlands and the Italian theater of war.
The gathering that opened on 26 May 1496 drew more princes and nobles
than any diet in memory, and Maximilian pressed two demands with
everything his own eloquence could muster: a nominal request for help
against renewed Ottoman raids into Croatia, and his real object, an
appeal for troops to drive the French out of Italy altogether. He
warned the assembled princes that French control of both Brittany and
Naples would let Charles VIII crush the church's and the empire's own
liberties outright, paraded ambassadors from Naples's exiled king as
living proof, and let a papal legate describe the Pope's own flight
from Rome in vivid detail. Coxe judges this the one moment when direct
imperial intervention might genuinely have driven France from Italy
for good - a rare alignment of motive, moral case and opportunity all
at once. None of it worked. The German states had grown numb to
complaints about Turkish incursions after decades of hearing them, and
proved no more moved by arguments about the European balance of power
than they had been by any of Frederick's own earlier appeals - an
empire that had learned, across generations of unanswered requests, to
treat its own emperor's foreign wars as somebody else's problem.
A court that could not be dismissed
What the German states actually wanted, after generations of failed
attempts by earlier emperors, was a permanent end to private warfare
and a real tribunal to enforce it - and they used the leverage of
Maximilian's own urgent need for troops to finally extract concessions
no predecessor had managed to win from them. Maximilian, eager enough
for their support to accept the trade, agreed with unusual speed: by 7
August the ordinances establishing a perpetual public peace and a new
supreme tribunal, the Imperial Chamber Court, had his signature and
the diet's own approval. Private warfare was formally abolished, with
a heavy fine and the imperial ban threatened against any noble or town
that dared declare it again. The new court broke real ground in its
own design - a president and sixteen assessors split evenly between
knights and trained jurists, chosen by the emperor from candidates the
states themselves nominated, and, for the first time in any German
institution of this kind, members who could not be removed from office
once appointed. Its authority was limited at first, and it struggled
in its early years for members, funding and any real means of
enforcing its own rulings, but the foundation held: moved successively
through half a dozen German cities before finally settling at Wetzlar
in 1698, it grew into one of the empire's most durable institutions -
a genuine, lasting achievement born from a diet Maximilian had
convened for an entirely different purpose.
Money that never came
The gratitude Maximilian expected in return for these concessions
never translated into the war funding he actually needed. The diet,
after long hesitation, voted a standing army grandly described as
"sufficient to check the progress of the French" and funded it with
just a hundred fifty thousand florins, a third from the Habsburgs'
own hereditary lands and the rest raised through a new levy called the
common penny - wrapped in conditions that bound Maximilian's own hands
as tightly as the tax bound the states'. The law was precise; the
collection was not. Suabia and Franconia's own states simply withheld
or delayed payment, and after repeated new ordinances trying to force
compliance, barely half the promised sum was ever actually collected -
and even that arrived so slowly that Charles VIII could have conquered
the whole of Italy before German gold reached anyone capable of
raising troops with it. Rather than leading nine thousand men into
Italy as he had promised, Maximilian could scrape together only three
thousand - a fraction of what the diet had voted, and nowhere near
enough to let him take personal command of the war he had spent so
much political capital convening the diet to fight.
A romantic expedition
Germany's own paralysis at Worms turned out not to matter as much as
Maximilian feared: Charles VIII abandoned Naples almost as fast as he
had taken it, the moment he learned of the league forming against him
and, worse, Ludovico Sforza's own defection to it. Leaving a viceroy
to hold what he could, Charles marched north with eight thousand
troops, passed again through a Rome now abandoned by the Pope, and
crossed the Apennines toward Parma - only to find the league's own
combined army waiting for him at Fornovo, on the Taro river. Despite
commanding the smaller force, Charles attacked on 6 July 1495 and,
after a hard-fought engagement, forced his own way through the
confederate line and reached the safety of Asti, making peace with
Sforza on the spot. Naples turned against its French occupiers almost
as soon as Charles was gone, and the exiled Neapolitan king, returning
with Spanish reinforcements under Gonzalo de Córdoba, reclaimed his
kingdom - though he did not live to enjoy it long. Charles, undeterred,
was already planning a second Italian expedition before the year was
out, this time aimed at Milan itself.
*The Battle of Fornovo*, painted by an unknown master between 1495 and 1506.
National Gallery of Art, Washington · Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Master of the Battle of Fornovo · CC0
Ludovico Sforza's own alarm at the threatened invasion was enough to
draw Maximilian back into Italy himself, though with a force of only
five hundred horse and eight companies of foot - a fraction of what
his own hopes for German reinforcement had led him to expect. He
crossed the Alps only to discover Charles had already postponed the
expedition that supposedly justified the trip; no German troops joined
him, and his own allies, no longer needing his presence, began hinting
broadly that he should go home. Unwilling to leave without some
visible achievement, Maximilian was eventually permitted only a lesser
consolation: a siege of Livorno, meant to pry Florence loose from its
French alliance. He blockaded the port by sea, but could not actually
stop supplies reaching the defenders, and when a storm scattered his
own ships he was forced into a land siege his allies undermined at
every turn - the Venetian generals in particular slowing the effort
until Maximilian, recognizing his coalition partners had no real
interest in his success, vented his fury on their ambassadors and
abandoned the whole enterprise in December 1496. Coxe judges the
episode harshly: a "precipitate and romantic" venture that cost
Maximilian real standing as both head of the empire and a prince of
genuine ability - the second time in two years his own Italian
ambitions had collapsed for want of the resources needed to match
them.
Curbing the Swiss
contractionDrafted from Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847)
The Treaty of Senlis had left one piece of business deliberately
unresolved: France was to hold Burgundy itself until its rival claims
were settled, returning three named towns once Philip, Maximilian's
own son, turned twenty. Philip, reaching that age, demanded not just
the towns but every territory France had carved from the old
Burgundian inheritance, and Charles VIII simply stalled until his own
death in 1498 left the question to his successor, Louis XII - who
divorced his own wife to marry Anne of Brittany, the same woman
Maximilian had once wed before she was taken from him. Philip's
renewed appeals went no better than before, and a mixed force of
Austrian soldiers and Swiss mercenaries sent into Burgundy collapsed
once the Swiss contingent mutinied over unpaid wages; Louis XII, whose
own ambitions had already turned toward conquering Milan, offered
peace on terms Philip accepted readily - the three towns restored, and
any further claim to Burgundy itself abandoned to the judgment of a
French court that was never going to rule against its own king.
Guelderland and Friesland, meanwhile, reopened almost as soon as they
seemed settled. The young pretender Charles of Egmont, driven out once
already, took up arms again when the new tax established at Worms
provoked real discontent among his own former subjects, and recovered
most of the duchy with quiet French backing; Friesland's own people,
encouraged by their neighbors' success, mounted a parallel resistance
and placed themselves under Guelderland's protection instead. Duke
Albert of Saxony struggled to suppress both uprisings at once, and once
Maximilian's own dispute with France was finally resolved, he marched
into Guelderland himself only to find Egmont's French backing too
strong to overcome - another regional conflict that ended not in
victory, but in a settlement France had quietly shaped from the start.
Excommunication and the ban
Facing constant French pressure over Burgundy, Naples and Milan alike,
Maximilian recognized how much the Swiss cantons' own military
reputation could matter as allies, and worked to pry them away from
their existing alignment with France - demanding, as head of the
empire rather than as a neighboring rival, contingents for the
Burgundian war, formal submission to the new Imperial Chamber Court,
and contributions to the taxes that funded it. The Swiss refused every
demand and declined to acknowledge themselves subjects of the empire
at all. Maximilian escalated in response: he had the Pope excommunicate
them as French collaborators and let the Imperial Chamber turn its
full coercive weight against them, placing two Rhaetian nobles under
the imperial ban. Rather than intimidating the cantons into submission,
the pressure drove the whole confederacy together - seven of the old
cantons allying with two Rhaetian leagues, themselves already
alienated by separate disputes with Tyrol's own government, leaving
only Bern still working to avoid an open break with Austria. Into this
already volatile standoff, Louis XII assumed the title Duke of Milan
and began preparing to conquer the duchy outright; Maximilian warned
the Swiss against aiding the move and demanded six thousand men to
back his own son's claims in Burgundy, a request they refused outright
until the Chamber's pressure on them was lifted, promising strict
neutrality in the meantime. Both sides stood in a state of mutual
irritation that needed only a spark.
Dornach in 1499, the war that followed, in a woodcut of about 1500.
Coxe, History of the House of Austria, from the Foundation of the Monarchy by Rhodolph of Hapsburgh to the Death of Leopold the Second, 1218-1792 (1847) · Unknown artist · Public domain
Succession
No source consulted for this polity carries a line of descent into it or out of it. Inheriting a predecessor’s claim, and leaving one behind, is something some polities did and many did not.
The shaded band is this polity’s span; the dark part of each bar is the stretch the two shared.
Derived from cited spans, not from a separate source. Where both spans are ranges and they meet only on the widest reading of each, the pair is listed as possible rather than resolved to one answer. Unlinked entries are here for scale and are not written up.
Extent
The historical-basemaps snapshots are world maps at fixed years, and none of the ones falling inside this polity's lifetime names it among the polities it draws.
Rating
Four axes, all computed from cited numbers and never from editorial judgement. Percentiles are against every polity written up here — 419 of them — plus 49 more included for scale. Absolute figures. A missing axis is excluded from the total rather than counted as zero.
Reach
No cited figure
Longevity
226 years
52nd percentile
Demographic weight
No cited figure
Influence
Three separate counts. This site never publishes a single influence number of its own; the sliders on the rankings view fuse them only in your view.
Descendant scripts
No cited figure
Religions carried
No cited figure
Successor claims
No cited figure
Weighted total
52nd percentile
computed from 1 of 4 axes, renormalised across the axes that have figures. A polity with two documented axes is not penalised against one with four.