The horde of the Manghit, ruled from Saraychiq on the Yaik by the descendants of Edigu — the one great power of the post-Mongol steppe whose chiefs could make khans of their neighbours and never take the title themselves.
The steppe between the Volga, the Yaik and the Emba
Capitals
Saraychiqfrom 1481 to 1580
Founder
Musa
Peak-era ruler
Ismailr. 1555–1563
Last ruler
Ishterekr. 1604–1613
Administration
Nogai
Writing system
Arabic
How it ended
conquest1643Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)
How it was governed
4 of 4 coded
Army raised byHow the fighting force was recruited, not how it fought.
tribal levy
Contingents raised through kin or tribal structures the ruler did not create
Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)
Revenue fromWhat the state lived on. The values are unranked: the field cannot express which mattered most.
tribute andplunder andtrade toll
tribute — Revenue received from another polity
plunder — Campaign proceeds treated as structural income
trade toll — Customs, straits dues and caravan levies
others, Early Voyages and Travels to Russia and Persia (1886)
Succession byThe rule in force, not the outcome. A rule repeatedly violated is still the rule.
factional
No rule: whichever faction could impose its man
Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)
Right to rule fromThe ground publicly asserted — on coins, in the khutba, in titles.
descent
Descent from a house or lineage, publicly invoked
Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)
Each line is drawn from a source that addresses the question directly. A line reads No cited figure where no source consulted does — never because the answer seemed obvious.
Turning points
4 hinges
1523The killing of Mehmed Giraybattle
It established the horde's permanent method and its permanent limit. The Manghit could destroy any neighbour that grew too strong and could not annex anything, because their own princes would not accept one of their number becoming what they had just killed a man for being.
Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)
1555Ismail kills Yusufsuccession crisis
The horde had split between a brother who wanted the Ottoman and Crimean connection and a brother who wanted the Russian one, and the Russian brother won by murder. Ismail wrote to Ivan IV from Saraychiq that his enemy no longer lived and that the clans had put the reins of power in his hands. He then asked Moscow to build forts on the Volga delta and the Irgiz against his own nephews.
Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)
1580Saraychiq burnedcatastrophe
Cossacks driven off the Volga by the tsar's troops came round the Caspian to the mouth of the Yaik, heard from prisoners what lay upriver, and took and burned the Nogai capital, dragging the corpses out of the tombs. They then built themselves a town of their own, Uralsk, in the middle of the horde's pastures. The Nogai never had a fixed centre again.
Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)
1604The oath at Astrakhantreaty
The horde stopped being a power with a foreign policy and became a body of subjects whose internal disputes an outside commissary came to settle. Everything the murzas had done for a century - making khans, choosing between sultans and tsars, selling their cavalry to the highest bidder - was signed away in a single oath at somebody else's town.
Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)
Chapters
6 in order
The kingmakers
Drafted from Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)formation
The most consequential rule in the post-Mongol steppe was that only a descendant
of Chinggis Khan could be a khan. It decided who could found a state, who could
only serve one — and it produced, in the Manghit, a power that was stronger than
most khanates and could never become one.
Edigü
Idiku, or Edigü, was a beg of the Manghit clan who entered the service of Timur
while Urus Khan and Toqtamish were fighting over the throne of the Kipchak. He
went with Timur on the great campaign that broke Toqtamish, was rewarded with a
jewelled girdle and a caparisoned horse, and asked leave to go home and gather up
his own scattered clans. Timur gave it, along with a diploma exempting his people
from capitation tax.
He spent the next twenty years making and unmaking khans of the Golden Horde. He
put Timur Kutlugh on the throne, then Shadibek, then Puladbeg when Shadibek was
deposed in 1407, then Chekre — and treated the khan at Sarai, Von Hammer says,
rather as an equal than as a master. He invaded Russia. He fought Vytautas of
Lithuania for a generation. He was finally killed in a battle with a son of
Toqtamish; one account has him wounded and hiding in the reeds, where he was found.
He could not be khan, and did not try. What he left instead was a name: the
hordes his descendants ruled came to be called after an earlier Jochid prince,
Nogai, and the murzas of all of them traced themselves to Edigü.
The horde on the Yaik
When he fell, the greater part of his people went east of the Volga and camped on
the Yaik and the Emba. Two of his sons went to Turan; one of them, Nur ad-Din,
became the founder of the power of the Great Nogai. His son was Waqqas; Waqqas's
sons were Musa, Yamgurchi, Hasan and a fourth killed in the Uzbek wars.
These men were subjects of Abu'l-Khayr while he lived. When he died they were
among the leaders of the revolt against his house, and in 1481, allied with Ibak
of Tyumen, they rode into the camp of Ahmad Khan of the Golden Horde — Yamgurchi's
own brother-in-law — and killed him.
That is the horde announcing itself: not by taking a throne but by removing the
man who sat on the senior one.
What they were for
Everything afterwards follows from the same position. The Nogai murzas had
cavalry, pasture between three river systems and no dynastic claim, and their
neighbours all had claims and needed cavalry.
So they married into Kazan and fought its wars; they dominated Astrakhan, and one
of them boasted to Moscow that the children of Timur Kutlugh had submitted to
him; they made and broke khans in the Crimea; they were the refuge and the
executioners of the khans of Siberia. Ivan III let Musa marry his daughter to the
khan of Kazan, and refused to let the khan's sister marry Yamgurchi's son, which
is a precise measure of how the arrangement was understood in Moscow.
The Manghit were not a state with a dynasty. They were the thing dynasties had to
come to terms with.
Three brothers
Drafted from Herberstein, Notes upon Russia: A Translation of the Earliest Account of that Country, entitled Rerum Moscoviticarum Commentarii (1851)expansion
Sigismund von Herberstein was at Moscow in 1517 and again in 1526, and the Nogai
were the largest thing on the map his hosts could not draw. What he set down about
them is short and almost entirely about how they were governed.
Dukes, not kings
They lived beyond the Volga, he writes, in the neighbourhood of the Caspian and
chiefly by the river Yaik. They had no kings. They were ruled by chiefs, whom he
renders as dukes and who are the murzas.
When he was in Russia three brothers held these duchies and had divided the
provinces equally between them. Shidiak held the city of Saraychiq and the
district along the Yaik. The second, whom Herberstein calls Cossum, had the
country between the Kama, the Yaik and the Volga. The third, Sheikh Mamai, held a
portion of Siberia and the land around it.
That is the whole constitution. A partible inheritance among brothers, no single
head that anyone outside could treat with, and a territory stretching from the
Kama to Siberia held by three men who were not required to agree.
Why it worked anyway
Because the horde's weight was applied through other people's thrones, and there
were enough of those to go round.
Sheikh Mamai's daughter married Safa Giray of Kazan, and in 1530 he sent thirty
thousand men to help his son-in-law resist a Russian attack. His brother Yusuf's
daughter Söyembikä was married first to Jan Ali of Kazan and then, when Jan Ali
was killed in a rising, to Safa Giray — and became the central figure of Kazan's
last twenty years. Their cousin Aguish was fighting the Crimea alongside the khan
of Astrakhan in 1509.
One family, in one generation, supplying queens to one khanate and armies against
another.
Saraychiq
The senior brother's town was the one fixed point. Saraychiq stood on the lower
Yaik on the caravan road from the Volga to Khwarazm, it held the graves of
princes, and it was where envoys went — Russian agents, Bukharan matchmakers,
Kazakh messengers — when they needed to speak to the Nogai rather than chase them.
It was not a capital in the sense Kazan had a capital. The horde lived in the
open; the town was where its business was done and its dead were kept. Both facts
mattered in 1580.
The Nogai century
Drafted from Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)peak
For roughly a hundred years, from the killing of Ahmad Khan to the burning of
Saraychiq, no ruler on the western steppe could act without reference to the
Manghit murzas. Two episodes show the range of what that meant.
1523: the conqueror at dinner
Mehmed Giray of the Crimea marched on Astrakhan in alliance with Sheikh Mamai and
took it, and then quartered his army inside the walls.
His cousin Aguish put the case to Mamai in one sentence that is the entire
political theory of the horde: What are we doing, idiots that we are, assisting a
neighbouring and ambitious power whose aim it is to subdue us one after another?
Mamai listened. He advised the khan, out of concern for his soldiers' discipline,
to camp outside the town in the Tatar manner; the khan agreed. Aguish came up
with his own army. The two of them surrounded the tent while Mehmed Giray was at
dinner, killed him and his son Bahadur and several of his grandees, fell on the
camp, and chased the survivors to the Don, where many drowned. They then entered
the Crimea, wasted it, and destroyed the twelve thousand men its chiefs raised to
stop them.
The strongest ruler in the west, removed in a fortnight by allies, at no
territorial gain to themselves. The Nogai wanted no delta and no peninsula. They
wanted no neighbour strong enough to want theirs.
1555: Ismail kills Yusuf
The other episode is the same logic turned inward, and it destroyed the horde.
By the 1550s the murzas had divided over the largest question on the steppe.
Yusuf, the senior prince, listened to Süleyman and to the khan of the Crimea, who
urged him to rally to the threatened cause of Islam; he allied with Astrakhan,
married his nephew into its royal house, and imprisoned a Russian envoy. His
brother Ismail took the other side, offered Ivan IV his alliance, and became the
patron of Dervish Ali, a claimant to the Astrakhan throne.
In December 1553 Ismail's envoys arranged at Moscow that a Russian army would
come down the Volga with him to punish Astrakhan and Yusuf both. It did, in 1554,
and put Dervish Ali on the throne.
In 1555 Ismail murdered his brother and wrote to the tsar from Saraychiq:
Your enemy no longer lives; my nephews and sons have unanimously put the reins
of power in my hands. I rule over all the clans.
He did not. Yusuf's five sons crossed the Volga and beat him and killed his
cousin; the sons of Sheikh Mamai turned on him too; at one point he was so hard
pressed that he asked permission to take refuge in Kazan or Astrakhan — in Russian
towns, from his own people. He killed another cousin, patched up a peace with
Yusuf's family, and survived.
What it cost
Ismail asked Moscow to build a fort on the Volga delta and another on the Irgiz,
to hold down murzas who would not submit to him. He asked the tsar to call him
brother, and the tsar declined as beneath his dignity. He invited the Russians
into the steppe as his guarantors and made his own succession a Russian interest.
He is in every sense the peak of the horde's power — no Nogai chief before him
ruled all the clans, even briefly — and he reached it by handing the decision to
somebody else.
Above one hundred thousand
Drafted from others, Early Voyages and Travels to Russia and Persia (1886)contraction
In 1558 an English merchant on his way to Bukhara spent part of the summer at
Astrakhan and watched the Nogai die. He is the only eyewitness of it, and he is
not a sympathetic one.
What he saw
Anthony Jenkinson was the Muscovy Company's agent. He recorded that the Nogai
were all destroyed in the yeere 1558, at my being at Astracan, through ciuill
warres among them, accompanyed with famine, pestilence, and such plagues, in such
sort, that in the sayd yeere there was consumed of the people, in one sort and
another, aboue one hundred thousand. The like plague, he says, was never seen in
those parts. A country of great pasture remained unpeopled — to the great
contentation of the Russes, who haue had cruell warres a long time together.
The survivors came into Astrakhan in great numbers to surrender to their enemies
and beg relief, and were ill entertained. They died of hunger all over the island,
lying in heaps, unburied and like beasts, very pittifull to beholde. Many were
sold by the Russians and the rest were driven off. Jenkinson notes, with the
detachment of a man pricing a commodity, that he could have bought as many Tatar
children as he wanted from their own parents — a boy or a girl for a loaf of bread
worth sixpence in England — but that his party had more need of victuals.
What was destroyed
He also wrote down how they had lived, in the past tense, because by the time he
wrote it was past.
They were divided into companies called hordes, each under a ruler called a murza
whom they obeyed as a king. They had no town and no house, but lived in the open
field, each murza with his people, wives, children and cattle about him, moving
when the pasture was consumed. When they moved they carried houses like tents set
on wagons drawn by camels, and in them their wives, children and all their riches,
which is very little. Every man had at least four or five wives besides
concubines. They had no use of money at all, but bartered cattle for clothing and
necessaries. They delighted in no art or science except war, at which they were
expert, but were for the most part herdsmen, with great store of cattle, which was
all their riches. They ate much flesh, especially horse, and drank mare's milk,
and were often drunk on it.
That is a complete description of a mobile pastoral economy with no reserve. It
explains the death toll. A horde that is fighting itself cannot move its herds to
the right pasture at the right time, and a people whose entire capital is livestock
has nothing to fall back on when the herds go.
The civil war
The war was Ismail's. He had killed his brother Yusuf in 1555 and spent the years
after it fighting Yusuf's sons, the sons of Sheikh Mamai, and anyone who would not
accept him; Moscow's armies were on the Volga throughout, taking Astrakhan in 1554
and annexing it in 1556, and the murzas were choosing sides in that quarrel as
well as their own.
A hundred thousand dead is Jenkinson's figure and he was counting nothing. What
is certain is that the power which had killed a Crimean khan in his own camp
thirty-five years earlier was, after 1558, never able to threaten anybody again.
The Cossacks and the Kalmyks
Drafted from Howorth, History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century, Part II: The So-Called Tartars of Russia and Central Asia, Division II (1880)end
The horde was finished off from two directions by peoples who had not existed as
powers when it was founded.
The Yaik
In 1580 Ivan IV sent an army under Ivan Murashkin against the Cossack bands who
had been plundering the Volga since the taking of Astrakhan — robbing merchants
and even the tsar's own envoys. Murashkin dispersed them, and they scattered in
three directions. One body went north under Yermak and destroyed the khanate of
Siberia. One went to the Terek. The third marched east along the Caspian shore to
the mouth of the Yaik, where they heard from prisoners about a famous Nogai
capital upriver.
They took Saraychiq, burned it, laid violent hands on the inhabitants and dragged
the corpses out of their tombs. The details survive in the correspondence between
the tsars and the murza Urus the following year.
Then they built a town of their own in the middle of the horde's country and
called it Uralsk, and became, Karamzin says, the terror of the Nogai — of Urus
above all, who never stopped complaining to Moscow about their brigandage. The
tsar replied that they were vagabonds and fugitives beyond his control. Urus's
answer deserves to be remembered:
A town of such importance, could it exist without your countenance? Some
prisoners whom we have taken say they are subjects of the Tzar.
The oath
What the horde had left was arbitration. In November 1604 the boyar Simeon
Godunov came to Astrakhan with full powers to settle the quarrels of the Nogai
chiefs. They assembled, declared Ishterek the senior prince, and the Russian
commissary put him on oath.
He and all the descendants of Ismail were to fight Russia's enemies to the death;
to grant nobody the title of prince or regent without the tsar's confirmation; to
stop the internal broils of the tribe; and to have no intercourse with the shah,
the sultan, the khan of the Crimea, the rulers of Bukhara and Khiva, the Kazakhs,
the shamkhal of the Kumyks or the Circassians. He was to camp where he was told —
near the Caspian, on the Terek, the Kuma, and the Volga by Tsaritsyn — and to
subdue the people of Kasai in Little Nogai, so that from the Black Sea to beyond
the Caspian there should be one horde under one man answerable to Moscow.
He kept it long enough to harry the Azov Nogai into selling their children at
Astrakhan, and broke it in 1613 by ravaging the Ukraine and riding to the
neighbourhood of Moscow, because he disapproved of the election of Michael
Romanov.
The Kalmyks
Then the Torghuts came. They crossed into the Tara district in 1606, were beaten
back by degrees, and after a catastrophe at the hands of the Mongols around 1620
and pressure from the Kazakhs behind them they poured westward in numbers and
settled on the Chumysh, the Ob and the Tobol.
They kept coming. Kalmyk chiefs began demanding the tribute the Bashkirs had paid
the Nogai. In 1633 Kho-Urluk and his son marched against the Nogai chief Kanai
with the help of a rebel murza and pressed him so hard that he appealed to Moscow;
orders went to the commanders of Tobolsk, Tyumen and Tura to punish the Kalmyks,
and those towns were much too far away to do anything at all.
In 1643 Kho-Urluk moved down to the neighbourhood of Astrakhan and tried to detach
the Nogai princes from their Russian allegiance; the Russians marched out and
killed him with some of his sons and grandsons. It made no difference. Not long
after, his sons Yeldeng and Loosang crossed the Yaik into the Volga steppe and
subdued the Nogai tribes of Kitai-Kipchak, Mailebash and Yedisan, and the Turkmen
of the Red Camel Horde south of the Emba.
The greater part of the Volga Nogai became the Kalmyks' subjects and followed
their fortunes. Howorth's summary of the whole process is four words long: the
Kalmyks swept over the steppes of the Yaik, broke it to pieces, and scattered it
hither and thither.
Between the Dniester and the Dnieper
Drafted from Tott, Memoirs of the Baron de Tott on the Turks and the Tartars (1786)afterlife
The hordes that would not live under the Kalmyks went west, and two centuries
after Saraychiq burned a French officer found their descendants pasturing horses
on the Black Sea steppe under a governor appointed from the Crimea.
The migration
Under Ayuka, who took the Kalmyk throne in 1672, the Great Horde Nogai were his
subjects except a small group camped near Astrakhan, and most of them left the
Yaik and the Volga altogether for the Kuban and the Kuma. When Ayuka died in 1724
and his people fell into confusion, the Yedisan and Yembulad tribes took the
chance, crossed the Crimean steppes and joined the Tatars of Akkerman; the
Kitai-Kipchaks followed them. Fear of the Kalmyks was one reason; being on bad
terms with the Circassians and with the Little Nogai of Kasai was another.
By the middle of the eighteenth century the Yedisan were camped between the
Dniester and the Dnieper and the Yembulad between the Dnieper and Azov, the first
under a seraskier and the second under a kaymakam, both appointed by the khan of
the Crimea.
What de Tott found
The Baron de Tott, sent to reside with Maqsud Giray in the 1760s, travelled among
them. They were governed by the khan's own son with the title of seraskier. They
were extremely discontented, because the khan had recently transferred to the
sultan the grain tax they paid. The pastures of the Yedisan were separated from
Bessarabia by the Dniester.
They lived, he says, in tribes settled in valleys fifty or sixty feet deep that
cut the plain from north to south.
That is the last position of the horde of Edigü: three or four clans in the
ravines of the Pontic steppe, taxed by a Crimean prince on behalf of an Ottoman
sultan, and cross about it.
The reversal
It is worth setting the two ends of the story beside each other.
The Manghit began as the power that made khans — that put four successive
Chinggisids on the throne of Sarai, married its daughters into Kazan, decided who
ruled at Astrakhan, and in 1523 killed the khan of the Crimea in his tent because
he was becoming a nuisance.
They finished as the Crimean khan's tax base.
Nothing about that was a peculiar Nogai failure. It is what happened to mobile
pastoral power everywhere in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, when
gunpowder states with rivers and forts began to be able to reach places cavalry
had made unreachable. What is peculiar to the Nogai is how visible it is, because
they never had walls to lose — only a name, a genealogy, and the ability to be
somewhere a khan did not expect them.
The Manghit begs who had made and unmade khans at Sarai for eighty years finished the job: Musa and Yamgurchi rode into the camp of the Horde's last khan with Ibak of Tyumen and killed him, and thereafter ruled their own people as murzas because, not being Chinggisids, they could never rule them as khans.
What led away
Nogai Hordeconquered bythe Kalmyk Khanate
The Torghut Kalmyks came west over the Yaik in the 1620s and 1630s and broke the horde to pieces. Kho-Urluk was killed near Astrakhan in 1643 trying to detach the Nogai princes from Russian allegiance; his sons Yeldeng and Loosang then crossed the river and subdued the Nogai tribes of Kitai-Kipchak, Mailebash and Yedisan outright. The greater part of the Volga Nogai became the Kalmyks' subjects and followed their fortunes.
Derived from cited spans, not from a separate source. Where both spans are ranges and they meet only on the widest reading of each, the pair is listed as possible rather than resolved to one answer. Unlinked entries are here for scale and are not written up.
Extent
The historical-basemaps snapshots are world maps at fixed years, and none of the ones falling inside this polity's lifetime names it among the polities it draws.
Rating
Four axes, all computed from cited numbers and never from editorial judgement. Percentiles are against every polity written up here — 280 of them — plus 50 more included for scale. Absolute figures. A missing axis is excluded from the total rather than counted as zero.
Reach
No cited figure
Longevity
162–191 years
43rd to 48th percentile — the sources disagree on the span, so the rank is a range too
Demographic weight
No cited figure
Influence
Three separate counts. This site never publishes a single influence number of its own; the sliders on the rankings view fuse them only in your view.
Descendant scripts
0
Religions carried
No cited figure
Successor claims
No cited figure
Weighted total
44th percentile
computed from 2 of 4 axes, renormalised across the axes that have figures. A polity with two documented axes is not penalised against one with four.