The Dalai Lama's own government, installed by a Mongol khan who crushed a rival king, run for decades by a regent who built the Potala in the Fifth Dalai Lama's name, drawn under Chinese oversight after a disputed reincarnation, and twice exiled before expelling the last foreign army in 1912.
Army raised byHow the fighting force was recruited, not how it fought.
No cited figure
Revenue fromWhat the state lived on. The values are unranked: the field cannot express which mattered most.
No cited figure
Succession byThe rule in force, not the outcome. A rule repeatedly violated is still the rule.
No cited figure
Right to rule fromThe ground publicly asserted — on coins, in the khutba, in titles.
conquestThe right of the sword, asserted as such
divine sanctionA mandate from above — heaven, or a claim to be mahdi or imam
investiture
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
Each line is drawn from a source that addresses the question directly. A line reads No cited figure where no source consulted does — never because the answer seemed obvious.
Turning points
6 hinges
16351912
1635
The Tsang king's riseBattle
The king of Tsang defeated the last ruler of the Sitya dynasty, briefly bringing a rival, non-Gelug power to dominance in Central Tibet - the immediate instability that gave Gushi Khan his own opening a few years later.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
1642
Gushi Khan installs the Fifth Dalai LamaBattle
Gushi Khan, chief of the Oelöt Mongols, subdued the king of Tsang and installed the fifth Dalai Lama on the Tibetan throne - founding a government under which His Holiness soon retired "to the higher sphere of things religious," leaving secular affairs to his own Chief Minister, Sang-gye Gyatso.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
1706
The execution of the Sixth Dalai LamaSuccession crisis
Doubts over the unorthodox sixth Dalai Lama, Tsang-yang Gyatso, let the Chinese and their Mongol allies remove and kill him, installing their own nominee in his place - a choice most Mongols and Tibetans refused to accept, touching off years of conflict that ended only when a Chinese army marched to Lhasa in 1720 to enthrone the child the Tibetans themselves had chosen.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
1750
The Lhasa massacre of the AmbansRevolt
The Chinese Residents (Ambans) murdered the Tibetan Regent, and the people of Lhasa massacred the Chinese in turn; the Qianlong Emperor's army restored Chinese ascendancy and strengthened the Ambans' own standing afterward - deepening, rather than loosening, Qing oversight of the Ganden Phodrang's own government.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
1904
The Younghusband expedition takes LhasaSiege
A British mission sent to negotiate trade questions grew into a full military expedition that fought its way to Lhasa itself; the Thirteenth Dalai Lama fled north to Mongolia rather than receive the British in his own capital, leaving his ministers to sign the Lhasa Convention in his absence. Beijing's own attempt to use the crisis to depose him outright was rejected outright in turn - Tibetans smeared the deposition proclamation with dirt and kept referring affairs of state to their exiled ruler as though it had never been issued.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
1912
The last Chinese garrison expelled from LhasaRevolt
A second Chinese military occupation of Lhasa in 1910 drove the Dalai Lama and his government into a second exile, this time to India; the occupation collapsed the following year when the Qing dynasty's own authority disintegrated in the Chinese revolution, and by June 1912 the Chinese held no effective power left in central Tibet. The remaining garrison in Lhasa surrendered a few months later and was escorted peacefully across the Indian frontier - restoring the Ganden Phodrang's own government to power in its own capital without a foreign garrison inside it for the first time in generations.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
Chapters
5 in order · about 8 minutes
A groom who became a demon's son
formationDrafted from Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
Tibet's own government had passed through two prior eras of
priest-kings before the Dalai Lamas ever took secular power. The
Sakya hierarchs ruled with Mongol backing from about 1270 to 1345,
until King Chang-chub Gyal-tsen broke Sakya power and founded what
Bell calls the Second Monarchy - a dynasty that discarded many of the
Chinese and Mongol innovations the Sakya lamas had introduced, even
as Mongol and Chinese influence kept pressing on Tibet from outside.
The Sitya dynasty that followed ruled for three centuries in relative
peace and prosperity, until 1635, when it was overthrown by the king
of Tsang - a ruler popular tradition, Bell records, credited to
trickery and a demon mother, since he had reportedly risen from a
stable groom to supreme power through sheer cunning.
The fort at Shigatse, drawn by Sven Hedin and published in 1917.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924) · Sven Hedin · Public domain
Subdued a few years later
The Tsang king's own triumph proved short-lived. Gushi Khan, chief of
the Oelöt Mongols, subdued him only a few years after his victory and
installed the fifth Dalai Lama, Lobsang Gyatso, on the Tibetan throne
in his place - a conquest, not an election, that gave the Gelug
school of Tibetan Buddhism the secular authority it had never held
outright before. The fort the Tsang king had built at Shigatse
survived him: local tradition holds that the fifth Dalai Lama's own
Chief Minister later copied its design for the rebuilt Potala Palace
in Lhasa, so that the very architecture of the new Gelug government
carried a trace of the rival dynasty Gushi Khan's own conquest had
just destroyed.
The Fifth Dalai Lama between Gushri Khan and his minister Sonam Rapten, in a mural at Samye probably of the seventeenth century.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924) · Unknown artist · Public domain
The Great Fifth
peakDrafted from Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
Lobsang Gyatso is the only Dalai Lama besides the seventh whom
Tibetans remember by an honorific rather than simply a number - "The
Great Fifth," a title that has outlasted every criticism contemporary
foreign visitors leveled at him. The Jesuit Johann Grueber, who
reached Lhasa in 1661 with the Belgian Albert d'Orville - the first
Europeans to enter the city - described the ruling Dalai Lama in
openly hostile terms, but Bell's own judgment is blunt about how
little that mattered to the verdict of history: "nothing succeeds
like success." The Fifth Dalai Lama did not personally administer
the government he now headed for long; following established custom,
he withdrew to religious matters and left secular affairs to his
Chief Minister, Sang-gye Gyatso, a man Bell calls one of exceptional
talent.
The Dalai Lama as Grueber reported him, in Athanasius Kircher's *China Illustrata* of 1667.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924) · Johann Grueber · Public domain
A capital rebuilt and centralized
Under that arrangement the government of Tibet was centralized in
Lhasa and made genuinely more orderly - old regional forts, no longer
needed as centers of independent power, were gradually abandoned and
left to fall into ruin. The Great Prayer Festival, still the largest
and most striking event of the Lhasa calendar, was established on its
lasting basis during this reign, trebling or quadrupling the capital's
own population for three weeks each February and March. Sang-gye
Gyatso completed the Potala Palace in its present form a few years
after his own master's death, giving the new Gelug government a
physical monument to match its consolidated authority. Bell's own
assessment of the era is double-edged: the Fifth Dalai Lama and his
minister were men of real exceptional ability, but the growing
influence of Buddhism itself had softened Tibetan martial vigor, so
that from this point onward Tibet's own weight in regional affairs
would be religious rather than military - a shift the early Manchu
emperors of China, already courting the Dalai Lama's support to help
manage their own Mongol subjects, were quick to exploit.
The Potala, in a book published in 1906 after the British expedition.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924) · Laurence Waddell · No restrictions
The Fifth Dalai Lama died in 1680. His own Chief Minister concealed
the death for a time, ruling in his name while the Chinese court,
Bell notes, quietly went along with the concealment because it let
them keep citing his authority in their own dealings with the
Mongols - a convenient fiction on both sides that could not, in the
end, be maintained indefinitely.
A choice the emperor abandoned
contractionDrafted from Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
In due course a successor, Tsang-yang Gyatso, was installed in the
Pontifical Chair - a young man of real intelligence who devoted
himself to composing verse and enjoying the pleasures of the capital
rather than to religious duty, in a way that left many Tibetans and
Mongols doubting whether he could genuinely be a true incarnation at
all. That doubt gave China its opening. In 1700 Chinese forces
occupied Tachienlu, a strategic post on the road from Lhasa to
Sichuan, and annexed part of eastern Tibet outright; in 1706 the
Chinese and their Mongol allies removed the sixth Dalai Lama and put
him to death, declaring him no true incarnation and installing their
own twenty-five-year-old nominee in the Potala instead. Tibetans
refused to accept the substitute. Reports that Tsang-yang Gyatso had
already reincarnated at Litang spread through Lhasa, and with the
help of a fresh body of Oelöt Mongols who pushed through to the
capital, the Tibetans held their ground against the Chinese-appointed
rival even as the crisis let China tighten its own grip on the
country regardless of who actually sat in the Potala.
An emperor who changed his mind
The Kangxi Emperor found nearly every Mongol tribe backing the
Tibetans' own choice and regarded his own nominee as widely seen as
an impostor - a dangerous split that raised the specter, in Bell's
own reading, of a combined Mongol-Tibetan force uniting against
China outright. Kangxi's first army, sent in 1718, was defeated by
the Oelöts and Tibetans together. Rather than press a losing hand, he
abandoned his own candidate, adopted the boy the Tibetans themselves
had chosen, and sent a second, larger army to Lhasa in 1720 -
announcing, this time, that it came to enthrone the Tibetans' own
pick rather than to impose a rival. Tibetan resistance evaporated
once the goal aligned with their own choice, and the Chinese army
entered Lhasa unopposed, leaving a garrison of two thousand men
behind and keeping the road to Sichuan open with permanent
detachments - a Chinese military presence in the capital that had not
existed before the crisis over Tsang-yang Gyatso's own death began.
Massacre and restoration
Chinese oversight deepened further three decades later. In 1750 the
Chinese Residents at Lhasa, known as Ambans, murdered the sitting
Tibetan Regent; the people of Lhasa rose and massacred the Chinese in
response. The Qianlong Emperor dispatched an army that restored
Chinese ascendancy and left the Amban system stronger than before -
a cycle in which every Tibetan attempt to assert independent
authority against Chinese oversight ended, in Bell's own telling,
with that oversight more deeply entrenched than it had been before
the crisis began. The government Gushi Khan's conquest had installed
in 1642 endured through all of it, but by the middle of the
eighteenth century it endured as something the Qing court now
expected to supervise rather than merely to court.
The Amban's residence at Lhasa, photographed by Ovshe Norzunov about 1900.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924) · Ovshe Norzunov · Public domain
A proclamation thrown in the dirt
contractionDrafted from Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
British anxiety over Russian influence in Tibet, more than any
Tibetan provocation, produced the next real crisis for the Ganden
Phodrang's own government. A mission under Colonel Younghusband,
sent in 1903 to negotiate trade and frontier questions, found Tibetan
officials unwilling to talk and grew, over the following months, into
a full military expedition - fighting its way from the Chumbi Valley
to Gyantse and on to Lhasa itself against Tibetan soldiers armed with
antiquated matchlocks and swords against modern rifles. The Dalai
Lama and his entourage fled north to Urga in Mongolia rather than
receive the British in his own capital, leaving his ministers to sign
the Lhasa Convention of 7 September 1904 in his absence.
Kampa Dzong, where the British mission first halted, photographed by John Claude White in 1904.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924) · John Claude White · Public domain
A deposition nobody in Lhasa accepted
Beijing tried to use the crisis to reassert its own authority
directly, issuing a proclamation deposing the Thirteenth Dalai Lama
outright. The Tibetans' answer was immediate and unambiguous: they
smeared the proclamation with dirt and, throughout the years of His
Holiness's exile - first in Mongolia, then in China itself, where he
was received by the Qing court - continued referring every important
question of state to him in absentia, exactly as though the
deposition had never been proclaimed at all. He did not see his own
capital again until the very end of 1909, more than five years after
he had fled it.
A homecoming that lasted weeks
The Dalai Lama's return to Lhasa proved brief. Chinese troops under
the aggressive general Chao Erh-feng had already been subjugating
eastern Tibet by force in his absence, and in February 1910 some two
thousand Chinese soldiers advanced on Lhasa itself; an advance party
entered the city, fired on the population, and moved to seize the
Tibetan ministers outright. Fearing execution or permanent
imprisonment for the man they had just welcomed home, the Dalai Lama
and his government fled the capital again in the middle of the night
this time south toward India rather than north toward Mongolia,
with the Ganden Phodrang's own seals of office carried out alongside
them.
Nine days to the frontier
endDrafted from Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924)
The flight from Lhasa in February 1910 was, by any measure, a
remarkable feat for a court accustomed to leisurely travel: the Dalai
Lama, his ministers and roughly two hundred soldiers covered two
hundred and seventy miles in nine days, crossing three high passes
and the Tsangpo river with Chinese troops in close pursuit, before
riding into safety across the Sikkim frontier and on to Darjeeling.
The soldiers left behind at the river crossing to hold off the
pursuit did so at real cost, killing a number of the pursuing
Chinese before scattering across the country themselves. For a
second time in six years, Chinese assertion of authority over Tibet
had driven its own government into exile rather than secured it.
The Thirteenth Dalai Lama in India in 1910, with ministers who had fled with him.
Bell, Tibet: Past and Present (1924) · J. Burlington Smith · Public domain
A revolution nobody in Lhasa had to fight
What finally reversed the occupation was not Tibetan arms but a
collapse in China itself. As the Qing dynasty's own authority
disintegrated in the revolution of 1911, the Chinese garrison
occupying Tibet lost the political backing that had sent it there in
the first place; large numbers of its soldiers were captured and
deported to Sikkim, where Tibetan captors - by British report -
treated their former occupiers with a humanity that startled British
observers. By June 1912 the Chinese held no effective power left in
central Tibet at all, and the Dalai Lama returned from his second
exile to a country his own officials were already reclaiming without
him.
A garrison sent home rather than destroyed
The remaining Chinese troops garrisoned in Lhasa itself surrendered a
few months after the Dalai Lama's return and were escorted out across
the Indian frontier, given the same considerate treatment as the
soldiers deported earlier - a telling contrast with the violence the
Chinese occupation had itself employed. Ten-gye-ling monastery, which
had collaborated with the Chinese administration and long held the
privileged right to supply a regent during a Dalai Lama's minority,
was subdued, its monks expelled and its estates confiscated by the
Ganden Phodrang's own government. What had begun in 1750 as a
tightening of Qing oversight after the murder of the Ambans ended,
within the same institution's own lifetime, in the complete expulsion
of Chinese officials and troops from central Tibet - not a change of
government, but the same government the Great Fifth's regent had
built two and a half centuries earlier, ruling its own country again
without a foreign garrison inside it for the first time in generations.
Succession
What led here
Ganden Phodrang (Dalai Lama's Government)conquered bythe Tsangpa kings of Tsang
The king of Tsang overthrew the Sakya-descended "Second Monarchy" in 1635 and ruled Tibet in turn until Gushi Khan, chief of the Oelöt Mongols, subdued him a few years later and installed the fifth Dalai Lama on the Tibetan throne in his place - a conquest, not an election, that gave the Gelug school the secular authority it had never held outright before. Neither the Tsangpa kings nor the Sakya-descended dynasty before them has a record here.
Ganden Phodrang (Dalai Lama's Government)
1635–1912
What led away
No later polity is recorded as continuing from here.
The shaded band is this polity’s span; the dark part of each bar is the stretch the two shared.
Derived from cited spans, not from a separate source. Where both spans are ranges and they meet only on the widest reading of each, the pair is listed as possible rather than resolved to one answer. Unlinked entries are here for scale and are not written up.
Extent
The historical-basemaps snapshots are world maps at fixed years, and none of the ones falling inside this polity's lifetime names it among the polities it draws.
Rating
Four axes, all computed from cited numbers and never from editorial judgement. Percentiles are against every polity written up here — 419 of them — plus 49 more included for scale. Absolute figures. A missing axis is excluded from the total rather than counted as zero.
Reach
No cited figure
Longevity
277 years
62nd percentile
Demographic weight
No cited figure
Influence
Three separate counts. This site never publishes a single influence number of its own; the sliders on the rankings view fuse them only in your view.
Descendant scripts
No cited figure
Religions carried
No cited figure
Successor claims
No cited figure
Weighted total
62nd percentile
computed from 1 of 4 axes, renormalised across the axes that have figures. A polity with two documented axes is not penalised against one with four.