conquest1293Hall, A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100-1500 (2011)
How it was governed
1 of 4 coded
Army raised byHow the fighting force was recruited, not how it fought.
No cited figure
Revenue fromWhat the state lived on. The values are unranked: the field cannot express which mattered most.
No cited figure
Succession byThe rule in force, not the outcome. A rule repeatedly violated is still the rule.
No cited figure
Right to rule fromThe ground publicly asserted — on coins, in the khutba, in titles.
descent
Descent from a house or lineage, publicly invoked
Hall, A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100-1500 (2011)
Each line is drawn from a source that addresses the question directly. A line reads No cited figure where no source consulted does — never because the answer seemed obvious.
Turning points
2 hinges
1292The vassalrevolt
Jayakatwang, lord of Kediri and a subordinate of Singhasari, revolted while Kertanegara's forces were overseas on the Sumatran expedition, and killed him. Seventy years after Ganter, the kingdom that had lost eastern Java in one battle took it back in another.
Hall, A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100-1500 (2011)
1293The fleet he did not send forbattle
A fleet dispatched to punish a king already a year dead found a different king on his throne, and was manipulated into destroying him by the one claimant with the least right to call himself Kertanegara's heir - before that same claimant turned on the fleet that had just done his fighting for him.
Hall, A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100-1500 (2011)
Chapters
2 in order
Twelve months
Drafted from Hall, A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100-1500 (2011)formation
Jayakatwang was lord of Kediri and a vassal of Singhasari — the kingdom that
had destroyed Kediri at Ganter seventy years earlier and taken its place.
In 1292, with Kertanegara's army across the Java Sea on the Sumatran expedition
and the capital thinly held, he revolted, marched on it, and killed the king.
The sources describe what followed as a restoration: the second kingdom of
Kediri, using the same name the historiography gives the first.
Seventy years of waiting
It is worth stopping on what that means. Kediri had been the dominant power in
eastern Java for a hundred and eighty years before Ganter. After 1222 its lords
were subordinates in somebody else's kingdom, and stayed subordinates for three
generations.
Then the overlord's army left the island, and the lord of Kediri took the
throne back.
Whether Jayakatwang thought of himself as restoring his ancestors' kingdom or
simply as seizing an opportunity is not recoverable. What is recoverable is
that the sources — and the people naming the kingdom afterwards — treated it as
the same Kediri coming back, which tells you the first one had not been
forgotten in the seventy years it was gone.
And then a fleet arrived
He held it for about a year.
What ended it had nothing to do with Java's own politics. Kublai Khan had sent
envoys to Kertanegara demanding submission, and Kertanegara had sent the last
one back disfigured. The expedition dispatched to punish him was already at sea
when Jayakatwang killed him, and it arrived in 1293 to find a different man on
a throne it had no quarrel with.
The next chapter is what that fleet did.
The fleet he did not send for
Drafted from Hall, A History of Early Southeast Asia: Maritime Trade and Societal Development, 100-1500 (2011)end
Kublai Khan had sent envoys to Java demanding submission, and Kertanegara — in
the account that survives — had the last of them branded on the face and sent
back. The Yuan expedition dispatched to punish him arrived in 1293.
Kertanegara had been dead for a year. The man on the throne was Jayakatwang,
who had killed him, and who had no quarrel with anybody in China.
Raden Wijaya, Kertanegara's son-in-law, met the Mongols, presented himself as
Singhasari's rightful heir, and offered to guide them to the usurper. They took
the offer. Kediri was destroyed. Raden Wijaya then turned on the expedition,
drove it back to its ships, and founded Majapahit out of the same campaign in
the same year.
It is a rare way for a kingdom to die: destroyed by an expedition sent against
somebody else, in a war it had no part in starting.
Nothing else survives
A kingdom that lasted twelve months leaves almost no record of its own.
Jayakatwang raised revenue and troops the way Singhasari had raised them the
year before, because there was no time to do anything else and no source
describes him doing otherwise. There is no reform, no monument, no law, no
inscription programme. What there is, is one revolt, one year, and one
catastrophe arriving from a direction nobody in Java had chosen.
It is a complete history and it is almost empty, and those are not in tension.
Some polities simply do not last long enough to be anything.
Succession
The same polity, earlier: The Kingdom of Kediri(1042–1222) — the same ground and the same royal title, interrupted and then taken up again. Nothing was inherited and nothing was claimed, which is why no year is given: the country stopped being governed as itself, and later it was again, and there is no day on which that turned over.
Jayakatwang, lord of Kediri and Singhasari's own vassal, revolted while Kertanegara's army was in Sumatra and killed him, restoring the kingdom his predecessors had lost at Ganter.
Raden Wijaya guided the Yuan expedition — sent to punish a king who was already dead — against Jayakatwang, and founded Majapahit out of the same campaign in the same year.
Derived from cited spans, not from a separate source. Where both spans are ranges and they meet only on the widest reading of each, the pair is listed as possible rather than resolved to one answer. Unlinked entries are here for scale and are not written up.
Extent
The historical-basemaps snapshots are world maps at fixed years, and none of the ones falling inside this polity's lifetime names it among the polities it draws.
Rating
Four axes, all computed from cited numbers and never from editorial judgement. Percentiles are against every polity written up here — 280 of them — plus 50 more included for scale. Absolute figures. A missing axis is excluded from the total rather than counted as zero.
Reach
No cited figure
Longevity
1 year
0th percentile
Demographic weight
No cited figure
Influence
Three separate counts. This site never publishes a single influence number of its own; the sliders on the rankings view fuse them only in your view.
Descendant scripts
0
Religions carried
0
Successor claims
0
Weighted total
18th percentile
computed from 2 of 4 axes, renormalised across the axes that have figures. A polity with two documented axes is not penalised against one with four.